Datasets:

datasaur-dev

/

PubMedQA-fine-tuned-llama-3-1-8B-labels

like 0

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nMammographic screening in Sami speaking municipalities and a control group. Are early outcome measures influenced by ethnicity?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVES: Female citizens of Sami (the indigenous people of Norway) municipalities in northern Norway have a low risk of breast cancer. The objective of this study was to describe the attendance rate and outcome of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) in the Sami-speaking municipalities and a control group.\n-STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective registry-based study.\n-METHODS: The 8 municipalities included in the administration area of the Sami language law (Sami) were matched with a control group of 11 municipalities (non-Sami). Population data were accessed from Statistics Norway. Data regarding invitations and outcome in the NBCSP during the period 2001-2010 was derived from the Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN). The NBCSP targets women aged 50-69 years. Rates and percentages were compared using chi-square test with a p-value<0.05 as statistical significant.\n-RESULTS: The attendance rate in the NBCSP was 78% in the Sami and 75% in the non-Sami population (p<0.01). The recall rates were 2.4 and 3.3% in the Sami and non-Sami population, respectively (p<0.01). The rate of invasive screen detected cancer was not significantly lower in the Sami group (p=0.14). The percentage of all breast cancers detected in the NBCSP among the Sami (67%) was lower compared with the non-Sami population (86%, p=0.06).'}]

yes

The attendance rate and recall rates in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program were compared between Sami and non-Sami populations, and the results showed that the attendance rate was 78% in the Sami population and 75% in the non-Sami population, with a significant difference (p<0.01). The recall rates were 2.4% and 3.3% in the Sami and non-Sami population, respectively, with a significant difference (p<0.01). However, the rate of invasive screen detected cancer was not significantly lower in the Sami group (p=0.14), but the percentage of all breast cancers detected in the NBCSP among the Sami (67%) was lower compared with the non-Sami population (86%, p=0.06).

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDo Electrochemiluminescence Assays Improve Prediction of Time to Type 1 Diabetes in Autoantibody-Positive TrialNet Subjects?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To explore whether electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assays can help improve prediction of time to type 1 diabetes in the TrialNet autoantibody-positive population.\n-RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: TrialNet subjects who were positive for one or more autoantibodies (microinsulin autoantibody, GAD65 autoantibody [GADA], IA-2A, and ZnT8A) with available ECL-insulin autoantibody (IAA) and ECL-GADA data at their initial visit were analyzed; after a median follow-up of 24 months, 177 of these 1,287 subjects developed diabetes.\n-RESULTS: Univariate analyses showed that autoantibodies by radioimmunoassays (RIAs), ECL-IAA, ECL-GADA, age, sex, number of positive autoantibodies, presence of HLA DR3/4-DQ8 genotype, HbA1c, and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) measurements were all significantly associated with progression to diabetes. Subjects who were ECL positive had a risk of progression to diabetes within 6 years of 58% compared with 5% for the ECL-negative subjects (P<0.0001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were compared, with the base model including age, sex, OGTT measurements, and number of positive autoantibodies by RIAs. The model with positivity for ECL-GADA and/or ECL-IAA was the best, and factors that remained significantly associated with time to diabetes were area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide, fasting C-peptide, AUC glucose, number of positive autoantibodies by RIAs, and ECL positivity. Adding ECL to the Diabetes Prevention Trial risk score (DPTRS) improved the receiver operating characteristic curves with AUC of 0.83 (P<0.0001).'}]

yes

Electrochemiluminescence assays can help improve prediction of time to type 1 diabetes in the TrialNet autoantibody-positive population, with subjects who were ECL positive having a risk of progression to diabetes within 6 years of 58% compared with 5% for the ECL-negative subjects.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAssessment of appropriate antimicrobial prescribing: do experts agree?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the validity and reliability of expert assessments of the quality of antimicrobial prescribing, despite their importance in antimicrobial stewardship. We investigated how infectious disease doctors\' assessments compared with a reference standard (modal expert opinion) and with the assessments of their colleagues.\n-METHODS: Twenty-four doctors specialized in infectious diseases or clinical microbiology (16 specialists and 8 residents) from five hospitals were asked to assess the appropriateness of antimicrobial agents prescribed for a broad spectrum of indications in 56 paper cases. They were instructed how to handle guideline applicability and deviations. We created a reference standard of antimicrobial appropriateness using the modal assessment of 16 specialists. We calculated criterion validity and interrater and intrarater overall and specific agreement with an index expert (senior infectious disease physician) and analysed the influence of doctor characteristics on validity.\n-RESULTS: Specialists agreed with the reference standard in 80% of cases (range 75%-86%), with a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 84%, respectively. This did not differ by clinical specialty, hospital or years of experience, and residents had similar results. Specialists agreed with the index expert in 76% of cases and the index expert agreed with his previous assessments in 71% of cases.'}]

yes

Experts, specifically specialists in infectious diseases or clinical microbiology, agreed with the reference standard in 80% of cases, indicating a reasonable level of agreement on assessing the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs there a favorable subset of patients with prostate cancer who develop oligometastases?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To analyze, retrospectively, the patterns and behavior of metastatic lesions in prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy and to investigate whether patients with<or =5 lesions had an improved outcome relative to patients with>5 lesions.\n-METHODS AND MATERIALS: The treatment and outcome of 369 eligible patients with Stage T1-T3aN0-NXM0 prostate cancer were analyzed during a minimal 10-year follow-up period. All patients were treated with curative intent to a mean dose of 65 Gy. The full history of any metastatic disease was documented for each subject, including the initial site of involvement, any progression over time, and patient survival.\n-RESULTS: The overall survival rate for the 369 patients was 75% at 5 years and 45% at 10 years. The overall survival rate of patients who never developed metastases was 90% and 81% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. However, among the 74 patients (20%) who developed metastases, the survival rate at both 5 and 10 years was significantly reduced (p<0.0001). The overall survival rate for patients who developed bone metastases was 58% and 27% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and patients with bone metastases to the pelvis fared worse compared with those with vertebral metastases. With regard to the metastatic number, patients with<or =5 metastatic lesions had superior survival rates relative to those with>5 lesions (73% and 36% at 5 and 10 years vs. 45% and 18% at 5 and 10 years, respectively; p = 0.02). In addition, both the metastasis-free survival rate and the interval measured from the date of the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer to the development of bone metastasis were statistically superior for patients with<or =5 lesions compared with patients with>5 lesions (p = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively). However, the survival rate and the interval from the date of diagnosis of bone metastasis to the time of death for patients in both groups were not significantly different, statistically (p = 0.17 and 0.27, respectively).'}]

yes

Yes, there is a favorable subset of patients with prostate cancer who develop oligometastases, defined as patients with 5 or fewer metastatic lesions, who have superior survival rates compared to those with more than 5 lesions.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nCycloplegic autorefraction in young adults: is it mandatory?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: The precise correction of refractive error is especially important in young adults. It is unclear whether cycloplegic refraction is necessary in this age group. The purpose of this study was to compare the non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error measured in young adults.\n-METHODS: This was a prospective study of 1400 eyes (n\u2009=\u2009700) of enlisted soldiers aged 18 to 21\xa0years who were consecutively evaluated in an outpatient army ophthalmology clinic. One drop of cyclopentolate 1\xa0% was installed twice 10\xa0min apart, and cycloplegic refraction was performed in both eyes 40\xa0min later using an auto-refractor. The difference between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refractive measurements was analyzed.\n-RESULTS: The mean difference in SE between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic measurements was 0.68\u2009±\u20090.83\xa0D (95\xa0% CI, 0.64-0.72). Significantly greater differences were observed in hypermetropes than myopes (1.30\u2009±\u20090.90\xa0D versus 0.46\u2009±\u20090.68\xa0D, p\u2009<\u20090.001). Moderate hypermetropes (2 to 5\xa0D) demonstrated significantly greater refractive error than mild (0.5 to 2\xa0D) or severe (>5\xa0D) hypermetropes (1.71\u2009±\u20091.18\xa0D versus 1.19\u2009±\u20090.74\xa0D and 1.16\u2009±\u20091.08\xa0D respectively, p\u2009<\u20090.001).'}]

yes

The study found that the mean difference in spherical equivalent refractive error between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic measurements was 0.68 ± 0.83 D, indicating that cycloplegic autorefraction can provide more accurate refractive error measurements in young adults.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes screening or surveillance for primary hepatocellular carcinoma with ultrasonography improve the prognosis of patients?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonographic screening for primary hepatocellular carcinoma.\n-PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 680 eligible cases were classified into three groups (surveillance, opportunistic, and symptomatic groups) according to their initial exposure. We used survival time, tumor morphology, and T staging as prognostic outcomes. The outcomes of screened/unscreened and sur veillance/nonsur veillance were compared with the use of the logistic regression model.\n-RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratios for the screened group versus the unscreened group, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival time being used as outcomes, were 0.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.52), 0.33 (95% CI, 0.21-0.53), and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.23-0.61), respectively. The adjusted odds ratios for surveillance versus nonsurveillance were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.35-0.97), 0.45 (95% CI, 0.27-0.74), and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.26-0.73). The odds ratios were even smaller when tumor morphology or T stage was taken as the main outcome. All these results were statistically significant. There were significant gradient relationships between prognostic outcomes and extent of screening history.'}]

yes

The study found that ultrasonographic screening for primary hepatocellular carcinoma improves the prognosis of patients, with adjusted odds ratios showing a significant reduction in mortality rates for screened versus unscreened patients and surveilled versus nonsurveilled patients.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\n"Would a man smell a rose then throw it away?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy afflicting women, and the most common cancer overall in Jordan. A woman\'s decision to go for screening is influenced by her social support network. This study aims to explore Jordanian men\'s individual and contextual perspectives on women\'s breast cancer and their own role in the breast health of the females within their families.\n-METHODS: An explorative qualitative design was used to purposively recruit 24 married men aged 27 to 65\xa0years (median 43\xa0years) from four governorates in Jordan. Data in the form of interviews transcriptions was subjected to qualitative content analysis.\n-RESULTS: Three themes were identified: a) Supporting one\'s wife; b) Marital needs and obligations; c) Constrained by a culture of destiny and shame. The first theme was built on men\'s feelings of responsibility for the family\'s health and well-being, their experiences of encouraging their wives to seek health care and their providing counselling and instrumental support. The second theme emerged from men\'s views about other men\'s rejection of a wife inflicted by breast cancer, their own perceptions of diminished femininity due to mastectomy and their own concerns about protecting the family from the hereditary risk of breast cancer. The third theme was seen in men\'s perception of breast cancer as an inevitable act of God that is far away from one\'s own family, in associating breast cancer with improper behaviour and in their readiness to face the culture of Eib (shame).'}]

no

The study does not explicitly state that a man would smell a rose then throw it away, but it does discuss the cultural and social perspectives of Jordanian men on women's breast cancer and their role in the breast health of females within their families.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDepartment of Transportation vs self-reported data on motor vehicle collisions and driving convictions for stroke survivors: do they agree?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: Research on stroke survivors\' driving safety has typically used either self-reports or government records, but the extent to which the 2 may differ is not known. We compared government records and self-reports of motor vehicle collisions and driving convictions in a sample of stroke survivors.\n-METHODS: The 56 participants were originally recruited for a prospective study on driving and community re-integration post-stroke; the study population consisted of moderately impaired stroke survivors without severe communication disorders who had been referred for a driving assessment. The driving records of the 56 participants for the 5 years before study entry and the 1-year study period were acquired with written consent from the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO), Canada. Self-reports of collisions and convictions were acquired via a semistructured interview and then compared with the MTO records.\n-RESULTS: Forty-three participants completed the study. For 7 (13.5%) the MTO records did not match the self-reports regarding collision involvement, and for 9 (17.3%) the MTO records did not match self-reports regarding driving convictions. The kappa coefficient for the correlation between MTO records and self-reports was 0.52 for collisions and 0.47 for convictions (both in the moderate range of agreement). When both sources of data were consulted, up to 56 percent more accidents and up to 46 percent more convictions were identified in the study population in the 5 years before study entry compared to when either source was used alone.'}]

maybe

The Department of Transportation records and self-reported data on motor vehicle collisions and driving convictions for stroke survivors show a moderate level of agreement, with a kappa coefficient of 0.52 for collisions and 0.47 for convictions, but when both sources of data were consulted, up to 56 percent more accidents and up to 46 percent more convictions were identified.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nNeoadjuvant Imatinib in Locally Advanced Gastrointestinal stromal Tumours, Will Kit Mutation Analysis Be a Pathfinder?\n\nContext:\n-INTRODUCTION: Longer duration of neoadjuvant (NA) imatinib\xa0(IM) used for locally advanced (LA) gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) is not based on biology of the tumour reflected by kit mutation analysis.\n-MATERIAL AND METHODS: LA or locally recurrent (LR) GIST treated with NA IM from May 2008 to March 2015 from a prospective database were included in\xa0the analysis. Archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) were used for testing KIT exons 9, 11, 13 and 17 by PCR.\n-RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients with LA or LR GIST were treated with NA IM. Forty-five patients (36\xa0%) had undergone c-kit mutation testing. Exon 11 was seen in 25 patients (55.5\xa0%), 3 with exon 9 (6.7\xa0%) and 2 with exon 13 (4.4\xa0%). Twelve were wild type (26.6\xa0%) and \xa03 (6.7 %) were declared uninterpretable. Response rate (RR) for the exon 11 mutants was higher than the non-exon 11 mutant group (84 vs. 40\xa0%, p\u2009=\u20090.01). Disease stabilization rate (DSR) rates were also higher in the exon 11 subgroup than non-exon 11 group (92 vs. 75\xa0%). Eighty-four per cent exon 11 and 75\xa0% non-exon 11 mutants were surgical candidates. Patients undergoing surgery had significantly improved event free survival (EFS) (p\u2009<\u20090.001) compared to patients not undergoing surgery, with the same trend seen in OS (p\u2009=\u20090.021). Patients with a SD on response to NA IM had a lower EFS (p\u2009=\u20090.076) and OS compared to patients achieving CR/PR. There were no differences between the various exon variants in terms of outcomes and responses'}]

yes

Kit mutation analysis can be a pathfinder in neoadjuvant imatinib treatment for locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours, as the response rate and disease stabilization rate were higher in the exon 11 mutant group compared to the non-exon 11 mutant group.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes the lipid-lowering peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors ligand bezafibrate prevent colon cancer in patients with coronary artery disease?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have suggested that hypertriglyceridemia and insulin resistance are related to the development of colon cancer. Nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR), which play a central role in lipid and glucose metabolism, had been hypothesized as being involved in colon cancerogenesis. In animal studies the lipid-lowering PPAR ligand bezafibrate suppressed colonic tumors. However, the effect of bezafibrate on colon cancer development in humans is unknown. Therefore, we proposed to investigate a possible preventive effect of bezafibrate on the development of colon cancer in patients with coronary artery disease during a 6-year follow-up.\n-METHODS: Our population included 3011 patients without any cancer diagnosis who were enrolled in the randomized, double blind Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study. The patients received either 400 mg of bezafibrate retard (1506 patients) or placebo (1505 patients) once a day. Cancer incidence data were obtained by matching a subject\'s identification numbers with the National Cancer Registry. Each matched record was checked for correct identification.\n-RESULTS: Development of new cancer (all types) was recorded in 177 patients: in 79 (5.25%) patients from the bezafibrate group vs. 98 (6.51%) from the placebo group. Development of colon cancer was recorded in 25 patients: in 8 (0.53%) patients from the bezafibrate group vs. 17 (1.13%) from the placebo group, (Fisher\'s exact test: one side p = 0.05; two side p = 0.07). A difference in the incidence of cancer was only detectable after a 4 year lag and progressively increased with continued follow-up. On multivariable analysis the colon cancer risk in patients who received bezafibrate tended to be lower with a hazard ratio of 0.47 and 95% confidence interval 0.2-1.1.'}]

yes

The lipid-lowering peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors ligand bezafibrate tends to lower the colon cancer risk in patients with coronary artery disease, with a hazard ratio of 0.47 and 95% confidence interval 0.2-1.1.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes self-efficacy mediate the relationship between transformational leadership behaviours and healthcare workers\' sleep quality?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence for the influential role of transformational leadership on health outcomes, researchers have used either attitude outcomes (e.g. job satisfaction) or softer health measures, such as general well-being. Specific measures of well-being such as sleep quality have not been used, despite its association with working conditions.\n-METHODS: A longitudinal design was used to collect data from Danish healthcare workers at time 1 in 2005 (n = 447) and 18 months later at time 2 in 2007 (n = 274). Structural equation modelling was used to investigate the relationships between transformational leadership, self-efficacy and sleep quality at both time points independently (cross-sectionally) and longitudinally.\n-RESULTS: For all constructs, time 2 measures were influenced by the baseline level. Direct relationships between transformational leadership and sleep quality were found. This relationship was negative cross-sectionally at both time points, but positive between baseline and follow-up. The relationship between leadership and employees\' sleep quality was not mediated by employees\' self-efficacy.'}]

no

The relationship between transformational leadership and employees' sleep quality was not mediated by employees' self-efficacy.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes microbial contamination influence the success of the hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes?\n\nContext:\n-INTRODUCTION: Microbial contamination can be a marker for faulty process and is assumed to play an important role in the collection of hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) and infusion procedure. We aimed to determine the microbial contamination rates and evaluate the success of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients who received contaminated products.PATIENTS-\n-METHODS: We analyzed microbial contamination records of HPC grafts between 2012 and 2015, retrospectively. Contamination rates of autologous donors were evaluated for at three steps: at the end of mobilization, following processing with dimethyl sulfoxide, and just before stem cell infusion. Grafts of allogeneic donors were assessed only before HCT.\n-RESULT: A total of 445 mobilization procedures were carried out on 333 (167 autologous and 166 allogeneic) donors. The microbiological contamination of peripheral blood (323/333 donations) and bone marrow (10/333 donations) products were analyzed. Bacterial contamination was detected in 18 of 1552 (1.15 %) culture bottles of 333 donors. During the study period 248 patients underwent HCT and among these patients microbial contamination rate on sample basis was 1.3 % (16/1212). Microbial contamination detected in nine patients (7 autologous; 2 allogeneic). In 8 of 9 patients, a febrile neutropenic attack was observed. The median day for the neutropenic fever was 4 days (0-9). None of the patients died within the post-transplant 30 days who received contaminated products.'}]

yes

Microbial contamination was detected in 1.3% of the samples, and in 8 out of 9 patients who received contaminated products, a febrile neutropenic attack was observed, but none of the patients died within the post-transplant 30 days.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nVery high serum CA 19-9 levels: a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy?\n\nContext:\n-METHODS: From 2000 to 2007, 344 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for PA. Fifty-three patients (elevated group) had preoperatively elevated serum CA 19-9 levels (>400 IU/ml) after resolution of obstructive jaundice. Of these, 27 patients had high levels (400-899 IU/ml (HL)) and 26 patients had very high levels>or=900 IU/ml (VHL). Fifty patients with normal preoperative serum CA 19-9 levels (<37 IU/ml) comprised the control group.\n-RESULTS: Median survival of the control group (n = 50) versus elevated group (n = 53) was 22 versus 15 months (p = 0.02) and overall 3-year survival was 32% versus 14% (p = 0.03). There was no statistical difference in the median and 3-year overall survival between patients with HL and VHL. Patients in the elevated group who normalized their CA 19-9 levels after surgery (n = 11) had a survival equivalent to patients in the control group.'}]

no

Very high serum CA 19-9 levels (>or=900 IU/ml) is not a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy as there was no statistical difference in the median and 3-year overall survival between patients with very high levels and the control group.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nPerioperative care in an animal model for training in abdominal surgery: is it necessary a preoperative fasting?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: Demonstrate that the rabbit may be used in the training of surgery, in addition to present its perioperative care.\n-METHODS: Thirty two animals, with age and weight, respectively, from 3 to 5.5 months old and 3000 to 4200 grams, were undergone different periods of pre-operative fasting, exclusive intramuscular anesthesia (ketamine+xylazine), laparotomy with total gastrectomy and total splenectomy. It was dosed the pre-operative (initial) and post-surgical (end) serum blood glucose, in addition to quantify the gastric content after the resection of the part.\n-RESULTS: The anesthetical-surgical procedure presented a mortality rate of 3.125% (1:32) and a morbidity rate of 6.25% (2:32). It was evidenced an initial mean blood glucose = 199.4 mg/dl and the end = 326.1 mg/dl. In spite of extended fasting (minimum of 2 hours for the absolute fasting and maximum of 8.5 hours for liquids, and 20.5 hours for solids) all animals presented at the end of the surgical procedure any gastric content and a blood glucose increase. Those with fasting for liquids and solids when compared to the quantity of solid gastric content, presented a moderate negative degree of correlation.'}]

no

The study found that despite extended fasting periods, all animals presented no gastric content at the end of the surgical procedure and a blood glucose increase, indicating that preoperative fasting is not necessary in this animal model for training in abdominal surgery.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre physicians aware of the side effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors?\n\nContext:\n-STUDY OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) are considered safe, but they are associated with characteristic side effects, namely cough and angioedema, usually requiring discontinuation. We perceived that referrals for these side effects have become more and more frequent; therefore, we evaluated the degree of knowledge on the safety of ACE-I in different medical categories.\n-DESIGN: A questionnaire (13 questions) on side effects of ACE-I was posted to physicians.\n-SETTING: Everyday clinical practice.\n-PARTICIPANTS: Cardiologists, allergists, and general practitioners (GPs) from the National Healthcare System.\n-MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Three hundred twelve physicians were contacted, and 154 returned questionnaires that could be analyzed. Of the 154 physicians (mean age, 45 years) 48 were cardiologists, 52 were GPs, and 54 were allergists. The percentage of correct answers was low: 31.9% for cardiologists, 40% for GPs, and 33% for allergists. Thus, GPs provided a significantly higher percentage of correct answers with respect to the remaining categories (p = 0.05). The lower rate of correct answers (0 to 15.9%) concerned the time of onset of cough and the action to take. Cardiologists seemed to be less aware of the fact that angiotensin receptor blockers (sartans) can cross-react with ACE-I.'}]

no

The percentage of correct answers was low, with 31.9% for cardiologists, 40% for GPs, and 33% for allergists, indicating that physicians are not fully aware of the side effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nResidual fundus or neofundus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is fundectomy safe and effective as revision surgery?\n\nContext:\n-INTRODUCTION: Up to 30 % of patients who have undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy require revision surgery for inadequate weight loss, weight regain, and/or the development of severe upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic fundectomy (LF) in cases of a residual fundus/neofundus development regarding GERD symptoms.\n-METHODS: The study group comprised 19 patients (17 female; mean BMI 35.4 kg/m(2)) divided into 2 groups. Group A (n = 10) patients with severe GERD and evidence of residual fundus/neofundus, Hiatal hernia with good results in terms of weight loss. Group B (n = 9) patients with severe GERD, a residual fundus/neofundus, inadequate weight loss or weight regain. Fundectomy was indicated when a residual fundus/neofundus was associated with severe GERD symptoms. The presence of a residual fundus/neofundus was assessed by a barium swallow and/or multislice computed tomography.\n-RESULTS: No mortality or intra-operative complications occurred. Five postoperative complications occurred: 2 cases of bleeding, 1 mid-gastric stenosis and 2 leaks (10.5 %). All patients experienced improvements in their GERD symptoms and stopped PPI treatment. Group B exhibited an additional %EWL of 53.4 % at 24 months.'}]

yes

Fundectomy is safe and effective as revision surgery for residual fundus or neofundus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, with no mortality and only 10.5% postoperative complications, and all patients experienced improvements in their GERD symptoms.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre physician estimates of asthma severity less accurate in black than in white patients?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Racial differences in asthma care are not fully explained by socioeconomic status, care access, and insurance status. Appropriate care requires accurate physician estimates of severity. It is unknown if accuracy of physician estimates differs between black and white patients, and how this relates to asthma care disparities.\n-OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that: 1) physician underestimation of asthma severity is more frequent among black patients; 2) among black patients, physician underestimation of severity is associated with poorer quality asthma care.\n-DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among adult patients with asthma cared for in 15 managed care organizations in the United States. We collected physicians\' estimates of their patients\' asthma severity. Physicians\' estimates of patients\' asthma as being less severe than patient-reported symptoms were classified as underestimates of severity.\n-MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of underestimation, asthma care, and communication.\n-RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred and ninety-four patients participated (13% were black). Blacks were significantly more likely than white patients to have their asthma severity underestimated (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.08-1.79). Among black patients, underestimation was associated with less use of daily inhaled corticosteroids (13% vs 20%, p<.05), less physician instruction on management of asthma flare-ups (33% vs 41%, p<.0001), and lower ratings of asthma care (p = .01) and physician communication (p = .04).'}]

yes

Blacks were significantly more likely than white patients to have their asthma severity underestimated, and underestimation was associated with poorer quality asthma care.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes laparoscopic surgery decrease the risk of atrial fibrillation after foregut surgery?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation, which occurs in 12% of all major foregut surgeries, can prolong hospital stay and increase morbidity. Minimally invasive techniques in foregut surgery have been suggested to cause less tissue trauma. We examined the factors associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation after foregut surgery at our institution.\n-METHODS: We retrospectively examined the records of 154 adult patients who underwent major foregut surgery which included esophagectomy, partial or total gastrectomy, redo Heller myotomy, redo or transthoracic fundoplications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis with standard modeling techniques were performed to determine risk factors for new-onset atrial fibrillation.\n-RESULTS: Of the 154 patients, 14 patients developed new-onset atrial fibrillation with a higher mean age of 67.1 years (+/-8.8 years) versus 56.4 years (+/-14.1 years) (p = 0.006). Laparoscopic (p = 0.004) and nonthoracic surgeries (p = 0.01) were associated with lower risk of atrial fibrillation. Patients with atrial fibrillation had received more fluid (6.5 +/- 2.8 liters versus 5.3 +/- 2.0 liters) and had longer operations (370 +/- 103 min versus 362 +/- 142 min), none of which were statistically significant. The average intensive care length of stay of patients was longer: 7.5 +/- 6.8 days versus 4.0 +/- 7.1 days (p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed an association of atrial fibrillation with age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14, p = 0.01), and laparoscopic surgery (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.95, p = 0.04) after adjusting for surgery type.'}]

yes

Laparoscopic surgery is associated with a lower risk of atrial fibrillation after foregut surgery, as revealed by multivariate analysis with an odds ratio of 0.09 and a p-value of 0.04.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nThe Main Gate Syndrome: a new format in mass-casualty victim "surge" management?\n\nContext:\n-INTRODUCTION: Recent suicide bombings pose the novel problem for Trauma Centers of the massive simultaneous arrival of many gravely wounded patients.\n-METHODS: We report the experience of the French-German Military Trauma Group, a Level 2 Trauma Center, in Afghanistan during the wave of suicide bombings in February 2007.\n-RESULTS: Fourteen casualties were received. A first triage was carried out by the U S Army Level I group prior to evacuation. A second surgical triage was carried out with systematic ultrasound exam. Four cases (ISS>25) were re-categorized and underwent emergency surgical procedures.'}]

yes

The Main Gate Syndrome refers to a new format in mass-casualty victim'surge' management, specifically in the context of managing multiple gravely wounded patients simultaneously, as encountered in the wave of suicide bombings in February 2007 in Afghanistan.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDo communication disorders extend to musical messages?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Effective musical communication requires conveyance of the intended message in a manner perceptible to the receiver. Communication disorders that impair transmitting or decoding of structural features of music (e.g., pitch, timbre) and/or symbolic representation may result in atypical musical communication, which can have a negative impact on music therapy interventions.\n-OBJECTIVE: This study compared recognition of symbolic representation of emotions or movements in music by two groups of children with different communicative characteristics: severe to profound hearing loss (using cochlear implants [CI]) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Their responses were compared to those of children with typical-development and normal hearing (TD-NH). Accuracy was examined as a function of communicative status, emotional or movement category, and individual characteristics.\n-METHODS: Participants listened to recorded musical excerpts conveying emotions or movements and matched them with labels. Measures relevant to auditory and/or language function were also gathered.\n-RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the ASD and TD-NH groups in identification of musical emotions or movements. However, the CI group was significantly less accurate than the other two groups in identification of both emotions and movements. Mixed effects logistic regression revealed different patterns of accuracy for specific emotions as a function of group.'}]

yes

Communication disorders can extend to musical messages, as children with severe to profound hearing loss using cochlear implants and those with autism spectrum disorder showed differences in identifying musical emotions and movements compared to children with typical-development and normal hearing.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDo patients with rheumatoid arthritis established on methotrexate and folic acid 5 mg daily need to continue folic acid supplements long term?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: It is postulated that some aspects of methotrexate toxicity may be related to its action as an anti-folate. Folic acid (FA) is often given as an adjunct to methotrexate therapy, but there is no conclusive proof that it decreases the toxicity of methotrexate and there is a theoretical risk that it may decrease the efficacy of methotrexate.\n-OBJECTIVES: To look at the effect of stopping FA supplementation in UK rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients established on methotrexate<20 mg weekly and FA 5 mg daily, to report all toxicity (including absolute changes in haematological and liver enzyme indices) and to report changes in the efficacy of methotrexate.\n-METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 75 patients who were established on methotrexate<20 mg weekly and FA 5 mg daily were asked to stop their FA and were randomized to one of two groups: placebo or FA 5 mg daily. Patients were evaluated for treatment toxicity and efficacy before entry and then at intervals of 3 months for 1 yr.\n-RESULTS: Overall, 25 (33%) patients concluded the study early, eight (21%) in the group remaining on FA and 17 (46%) in the placebo group (P = 0.02). Two patients in the placebo group discontinued because of neutropenia. At 9 months there was an increased incidence of nausea in the placebo group (45 vs. 7%, P = 0.001). The placebo group had significantly lower disease activity on a few of the variables measured, but these were probably not of clinical significance.'}]

yes

The study found that 33% of patients who stopped folic acid supplementation experienced an increased incidence of nausea, and 46% of patients in the placebo group discontinued the study early, compared to 21% in the group remaining on folic acid.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nCan infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) on lower calyceal calculi in relation to the renal anatomical factors and determine which of these factors can be used to select patients who will benefit from SWL.\n-MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 78 patients with single radiopaque lower calyceal stones treated with SWL. The patients were evaluated 3 months after lithotripsy with a simple abdominal X-ray and a kidney ultrasound scan. The success of the treatment, removal of all fragments, was correlated with renal anatomical factors measured in the pre-treatment intravenous urography: infundibulopelvic angle, lower infundibulum width, lower infundibulum length, ratio length/width, infundibulum height, and number of minor calyces in the lower calyceal group.\n-RESULTS: Three months after SWL treatment, 39 patients were stone-free (NR group) and 39 had residual fragments (R group). Both groups presented no differences in relation to infundibulopelvic angle, width and length of the lower calyceal infundibulum, length/width ratio of the lower infundibulum or number of lower calyces. Height of the infundibulum, described as the distance between the line passing through the lowest part of the calyx containing the calculus and the highest point of the lower lip of renal pelvis, was the only parameter in which significant differences (p = 0.002) were found between the NR and R groups.'}]

yes

The height of the infundibulum was the only parameter in which significant differences were found between the stone-free group and the group with residual fragments, suggesting that it can predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes lung ischemia and reperfusion have an impact on coronary flow?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury remains a major cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation with poorly documented extrapulmonary repercussions. To determine the hemodynamic effect due to lung IR injury, we performed a quantitative coronary blood-flow analysis in a swine model of in situ lung ischemia and reperfusion.\n-METHODS: In 14 healthy pigs, blood flow was measured in the ascending aorta, left anterior descending (LAD), circumflex (Cx), right coronary artery (RCA), right common carotid artery (RCCA), and left internal mammary artery (LIMA), along with left-and right-ventricular pressures (LVP and RVP), aortic pressure (AoP), and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP). Cardiac Troponin (cTn), interleukin 6 and 10 (IL-6 and IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor A (TNF-A) were measured in coronary sinus blood samples. The experimental (IR) group (n=10) underwent 60 min of lung ischemia followed by 60 min of reperfusion by clamping and releasing the left pulmonary hilum. Simultaneous measurements of all parameters were made at baseline and during IR. The control group (n=4) had similar measurements without lung IR.\n-RESULTS: In the IR group, total coronary flow (TCF=LAD+Cx+RCA blood-flow) decreased precipitously and significantly from baseline (113±41 ml min"1) during IR (p<0.05), with the lowest value observed at 60 min of reperfusion (-37.1%, p<0.003). Baseline cTn (0.08±0.02 ng ml(-1)) increased during IR and peaked at 45 min of reperfusion (+138%, p<0.001). Baseline IL-6 (9.2±2.17 pg ml(-1)) increased during IR and peaked at 60 min of reperfusion (+228%, p<0.0001). Significant LVP drop at 5 min of ischemia (p<0.05) was followed by a slow return to baseline at 45 min of ischemia. A second LVP drop occurred at reperfusion (p<0.05) and persisted. Conversely, RVP increased throughout ischemia (p<0.05) and returned toward baseline during reperfusion. Coronary blood flow and hemodynamic profile remained unchanged in the control group. IL-10 and TNF-A remained below the measurable range for both the groups.'}]

yes

Lung ischemia and reperfusion has an impact on coronary flow, as total coronary flow decreased precipitously and significantly from baseline during IR, with the lowest value observed at 60 min of reperfusion.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs a patient\'s self-reported health-related quality of life a prognostic factor for survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: The aim of this prognostic factor analysis was to investigate if a patient\'s self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) provided independent prognostic information for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.\n-PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pretreatment HRQOL was measured in 391 advanced NSCLC patients using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC Lung Cancer module (QLQ-LC13). The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses of survival. In addition, a bootstrap validation technique was used to assess the stability of the outcomes.\n-RESULTS: The final multivariate Cox regression model retained four parameters as independent prognostic factors for survival: male gender with a hazard ratio (HR) = 1.32 (95% CI 1.03-1.69; P = 0.03); performance status (0 to 1 versus 2) with HR = 1.63 (95% CI 1.04-2.54; P = 0.032); patient\'s self-reported score of pain with HR= 1.11 (95% CI 1.07-1.16; P<0.001) and dysphagia with HR = 1.12 (95% CI 1.04-1.21; P = 0.003). A 10-point shift worse in the scale measuring pain and dysphagia translated into an 11% and 12% increased in the likelihood of death respectively. A risk group categorization was also developed.'}]

yes

A patient's self-reported health-related quality of life is an independent prognostic factor for survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients, with a 10-point shift worse in the scale measuring pain and dysphagia translating into an 11% and 12% increased in the likelihood of death respectively.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nTransient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN): a role for polymorphisms in the beta-adrenergic receptor (ADRB) encoding genes?\n\nContext:\n-METHODS: DNA was collected for genotyping from 73 term newborns suffering from TTN and 55 healthy controls from a Caucasian cohort.\n-RESULTS: TTN infants were more likely to be male (70% vs. 49%; p<0.05), had a lower mean birthweight (3120 +/- 450 vs. 3396 +/- 504 g; p<0.001) and gestational age (GA) (38.4 +/- 1.2 vs. 39.4 +/- 1.3 weeks; p<0.001) and were more often delivered by caesarean section (CS) (71% vs. 26%; p<0.001). The beta1Ser49Gly polymorphism differed significantly between cases and controls. Multivariate analysis provided beta1Gly49 homozygotes with higher risk for TTN (OR 18.5; 95%CI 1.5-229; p = 0.023) than beta1Ser49 allele carrier. Further analysis showed significant association of T-47C, A46G, C79G and C491T (TACC) haplotype in ADRB2 gene with TTN (p = 0.048).'}]

yes

The study found a significant association between polymorphisms in the beta-adrenergic receptor (ADRB) encoding genes and transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), with beta1Gly49 homozygotes having a higher risk for TTN and the T-47C, A46G, C79G, and C491T haplotype in the ADRB2 gene also associated with TTN.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs duration of psychological treatment for depression related to return into treatment?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: There is increasing pressure on mental health providers to reduce the duration of treatments, while retaining level of quality and effectiveness. The risk is that the population is underserved and therefore needs new treatment episodes. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether duration of treatment and return into mental health care were related.\n-METHODS: This study examined Dutch patients with an initial treatment episode in 2009 or 2010 in specialized mental health settings for depressive disorder (N\xa0=\xa085,754). Follow-up data about treatment episodes were available up until 2013. The data set included demographic (age, gender), and clinical factors (comorbidity with other DSM-IV Axis; scores on the \'Global Assessment of Functioning\'). Cox regression analyses were used to assess whether duration of treatment and relapse into mental health care were related.\n-RESULTS: The majority of patients did not return into mental health care (86\xa0%). Patients with a shorter duration of treatment (5-250\xa0min; 251-500\xa0min and 751-1000\xa0min) were slightly more likely to return (reference group:>1000\xa0min) (HR 1.19 95\xa0% CI 1.13-1.26; HR 1.11 95\xa0% CI 1.06-1.17; HR 1.18 95\xa0% CI 1.11-1.25), adjusted for demographic and clinical variables.'}]

yes

Patients with a shorter duration of treatment were slightly more likely to return into mental health care, compared to those with a longer duration of treatment.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes shaving the incision site increase the infection rate after spinal surgery?\n\nContext:\n-STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized clinical study.\n-OBJECTIVE: To determine whether shaving the incision site before spinal surgery causes postsurgical infection.\n-SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgeons usually shave the skin of the incision site immediately before surgery is performed. However, evidence from some surgical series suggests that presurgical shaving may increase the postsurgical infection rate. To our knowledge, no previously published studies have addressed this issue.\n-METHODS: A total of 789 patients scheduled to undergo spinal surgery were randomly allocated into 2 groups: those in whom the site of operation was shaved immediately before surgery (shaved group; 371 patients) and the patients in whom presurgical shaving was not performed (unshaved group; 418 patients). The mean duration of anesthesia and the infection rates in both groups were recorded and compared.\n-RESULTS: The duration of anesthesia did not differ in the 2 groups (P>0.05). A postoperative infection developed in 4 patients in the shaved group and in 1 patient in the nonshaved group (P<0.01).'}]

yes

Shaving the incision site before spinal surgery increases the infection rate, with 4 patients developing a postoperative infection in the shaved group compared to 1 patient in the nonshaved group.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nThe influence of atmospheric pressure on aortic aneurysm rupture--is the diameter of the aneurysm important?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: The rate of aortic aneurysm rupture correlates with the aneurysm\'s diameter, and a higher rate of rupture is observed in patients with larger aneurysms. According to the literature, contradictory results concerning the relationship between atmospheric pressure and aneurysm size have been reported.AIM: In this paper, we assessed the influence of changes in atmospheric pressure on abdominal aneurysm ruptures in relationship to the aneurysm\'s size.\n-METHODS: The records of 223 patients with ruptured abdominal aneurysms were evaluated. All of the patients had been admitted to the department in the period 1997-2007 from the Silesia region. The atmospheric pressures on the day of the rupture and on the days both before the rupture and between the rupture events were compared. The size of the aneurysm was also considered in the analysis.\n-RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in pressure between the days of rupture and the remainder of the days within an analysed period. The highest frequency of the admission of patients with a ruptured aortic aneurysm was observed during periods of winter and spring, when the highest mean values of atmospheric pressure were observed; however, this observation was not statistically confirmed. A statistically non-significant trend towards the higher rupture of large aneurysms (>7 cm) was observed in the cases where the pressure increased between the day before the rupture and the day of the rupture. This trend was particularly pronounced in patients suffering from hypertension (p = 0.1).'}]

maybe

A statistically non-significant trend towards the higher rupture of large aneurysms (>7 cm) was observed in the cases where the pressure increased between the day before the rupture and the day of the rupture.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDo French lay people and health professionals find it acceptable to breach confidentiality to protect a patient\'s wife from a sexually transmitted disease?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To determine under what conditions lay people and health professionals find it acceptable for a physician to breach confidentiality to protect the wife of a patient with a sexually transmitted disease (STD).\n-METHODS: In a study in France, breaching confidentiality in 48 scenarios were accepted by 144 lay people, 10 psychologists and 7 physicians. The scenarios were all possible combinations of five factors: severity of the disease (severe, lethal); time taken to discuss this with (little time, much time); intent to inform the spouse about the disease (none, one of these days, immediately); intent to adopt protective behaviours (no intent, intent); and decision to consult an expert in STDs (yes, no), 2 x 2 x 3 x 2 x 2. The importance and interactions of each factor were determined, at the group level, by performing analyses of variance and constructing graphs.\n-RESULTS: The concept of breaching confidentiality to protect a wife from her husband\'s STD was favoured much more by lay people and psychologists than by physicians (mean ratings 11.76, 9.28 and 2.90, respectively, on a scale of 0-22). The patient\'s stated intentions to protect his wife and to inform her of the disease had the greatest impact on acceptability. A cluster analysis showed groups of lay participants who found breaching confidentiality "always acceptable" (n = 14), "depending on the many circumstances" (n = 87), requiring "consultation with an expert" (n = 30) and "never acceptable (n = 13)".'}]

yes

The study found that lay people and health professionals, including psychologists, generally find it acceptable to breach confidentiality to protect a patient's wife from a sexually transmitted disease, but physicians are less accepting.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDo somatic complaints predict subsequent symptoms of depression?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests substantial comorbidity between symptoms of somatization and depression in clinical as well as nonclinical populations. However, as most existing research has been retrospective or cross-sectional in design, very little is known about the specific nature of this relationship. In particular, it is unclear whether somatic complaints may heighten the risk for the subsequent development of depressive symptoms.\n-METHODS: We report findings on the link between symptoms of somatization (assessed using the SCL-90-R) and depression 5 years later (assessed using the CES-D) in an initially healthy cohort of community adults, based on prospective data from the RENO Diet-Heart Study.\n-RESULTS: Gender-stratified multiple regression analyses revealed that baseline CES-D scores were the best predictors of subsequent depressive symptoms for men and women. Baseline scores on the SCL-90-R somatization subscale significantly predicted subsequent self-reported symptoms of depressed mood 5 years later, but only in women. However, somatic complaints were a somewhat less powerful predictor than income and age.'}]

yes

Somatic complaints, as measured by the SCL-90-R somatization subscale, predict subsequent symptoms of depression, specifically self-reported symptoms of depressed mood, in women, but not in men, and are less powerful predictors than income and age.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre women with major depression in pregnancy identifiable in population health data?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Although record linkage of routinely collected health datasets is a valuable research resource, most datasets are established for administrative purposes and not for health outcomes research. In order for meaningful results to be extrapolated to specific populations, the limitations of the data and linkage methodology need to be investigated and clarified. It is the objective of this study to investigate the differences in ascertainment which may arise between a hospital admission dataset and a dispensing claims dataset, using major depression in pregnancy as an example. The safe use of antidepressants in pregnancy is an ongoing issue for clinicians with around 10% of pregnant women suffer from depression. As the birth admission will be the first admission to hospital during their pregnancy for most women, their use of antidepressants, or their depressive condition, may not be revealed to the attending hospital clinicians. This may result in adverse outcomes for the mother and infant.\n-METHODS: Population-based de-identified data were provided from the Western Australian Data Linkage System linking the administrative health records of women with a delivery to related records from the Midwives\' Notification System, the Hospital Morbidity Data System and the national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme dataset. The women with depression during their pregnancy were ascertained in two ways: women with dispensing records relating to dispensed antidepressant medicines with an WHO ATC code to the 3rd level, pharmacological subgroup, \'N06A Antidepressants\'; and, women with any hospital admission during pregnancy, including the birth admission, if a comorbidity was recorded relating to depression.\n-RESULTS: From 2002 to 2005, there were 96698 births in WA. At least one antidepressant was dispensed to 4485 (4.6%) pregnant women. There were 3010 (3.1%) women with a comorbidity related to depression recorded on their delivery admission, or other admission to hospital during pregnancy. There were a total of 7495 pregnancies identified by either set of records. Using data linkage, we determined that these records represented 6596 individual pregnancies. Only 899 pregnancies were found in both groups (13.6% of all cases). 80% of women dispensed an antidepressant did not have depression recorded as a comorbidity on their hospital records. A simple capture-recapture calculation suggests the prevalence of depression in this population of pregnant women to be around 16%.'}]

yes

Yes, women with major depression in pregnancy can be identifiable in population health data, as shown by the study's use of data linkage to identify 7495 pregnancies with depression, representing 6596 individual pregnancies.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nRemote ischemic postconditioning: does it protect against ischemic damage in percutaneous coronary revascularization?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: Myocardial damage that is associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) partially affects the results of the procedure, and is related to medium-term cardiovascular death. Remote postischemic conditioning might reduce the myocardial lesions that are associated with PCI, but perhaps less so in diabetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of remote postischemic conditioning in patients undergoing elective PCI for stable angina or non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome with troponin<1 ng/ml at the time of randomization.\n-METHODS: This randomized single-blinded single-center clinical trial involved 320 patients undergoing elective PCI who were randomized to either receive three 5-min cycles of ischemia by inflation of a cuff on the non-dominant arm to 200 mm Hg (remote postischemic conditioning) or to placebo (uninflated cuff). The primary outcome variable was the maximum increase in troponin in the first 24 h. The secondary outcome variable was readmission due to heart failure or cardiovascular mortality after 1 year of follow-up. In addition, a diabetic population was studied.'}]

maybe

The study aims to evaluate the protective effect of remote postischemic conditioning in patients undergoing elective PCI, but it does not explicitly state that it protects against ischemic damage.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes combining antiretroviral agents in a single dosage form enhance quality of life of HIV/AIDS patients?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Combining various antiretroviral agents into one single dosage form has been a strategy to reduce pill burden and enhance medication adherence among human immunodeficiency virus /AIDS (HIV/AIDS) patients.\n-OBJECTIVES: This is a cost-utility study from a health care system\'s perspective comparing coformulated fixed dose (FXD) strategy versus multiple free dose combination (FRC) in antiretroviral therapy.\n-METHOD: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) was used to identify HIV/AIDS patients with ≥2 active antiretroviral medications. Patients on FXD were matched in 1:1 ratio with the FRC group using propensity scores. All medical costs excluding those paid by patients and families were included. Utility was measured using SF-6D scores from the SF-12 questionnaire. Incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were calculated using the mean annual estimates. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve was determined using a Monte Carlo probabilistic simulation technique.\n-RESULTS: Nine FXD antiretroviral formulations approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration by 2005 was included in this study. One hundred seventy HIV/AIDS patients with ≥2 antiretroviral agents were identified from the MEPS database, of which 53% (n=92) were on FXD formulation. On matching, 70 patients from FXD had a match from the FRC group. No differences in sociodemographic and health status variables were observed between the matched groups. The mean annual cost was $15,766.15 for FXD patients and $11,875.21 for FRC patients. The mean utility gained by using FXD over FRC was 0.085; however, this difference was not statistically significant. The ICUR for the FXD treatment over FRC treatment was $45,540.49/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed FXD to dominate FRC (>50% probability of being cost-effective) above the $40,000 threshold.'}]

maybe

Combining antiretroviral agents in a single dosage form does not significantly enhance the quality of life of HIV/AIDS patients, as the difference in utility gained was not statistically significant, but it was found to be cost-effective above the $40,000 threshold.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nThe inverse equity hypothesis: does it apply to coverage of cancer screening in middle-income countries?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether the inverse equity hypothesis-the idea that new health interventions are initially primarily accessed by the rich, but that inequalities narrow with diffusion to the poor-holds true for cancer screening in low and middle income countries (LMICs).This study examines the relationship between overall coverage and economic inequalities in coverage of cancer screening in four middle-income countries.\n-METHODS: Secondary analyses of cross-sectional data from the WHO study on Global Ageing and Adult Health in China, Mexico, Russia and South Africa (2007-2010). Three regression-based methods were used to measure economic inequalities: (1) Adjusted OR; (2) Relative Index of Inequality (RII); and (3) Slope Index of Inequality.\n-RESULTS: Coverage for breast cancer screening was 10.5% in South Africa, 19.3% in China, 33.8% in Russia and 43% in Mexico, and coverage for cervical cancer screening was 24% in South Africa, 27.2% in China, 63.7% in Mexico and 81.5% in Russia. Economic inequalities in screening participation were substantially lower or non-existent in countries with higher aggregate coverage, for both breast cancer screening (RII: 14.57 in South Africa, 4.90 in China, 2.01 in Mexico, 1.04 in Russia) and cervical cancer screening (RII: 3.60 in China, 2.47 in South Africa, 1.39 in Mexico, 1.12 in Russia).'}]

yes

The inverse equity hypothesis appears to hold true for cancer screening in middle-income countries, as economic inequalities in screening participation were substantially lower or non-existent in countries with higher aggregate coverage.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIdentification of racial disparities in breast cancer mortality: does scale matter?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: This paper investigates the impact of geographic scale (census tract, zip code, and county) on the detection of disparities in breast cancer mortality among three ethnic groups in Texas (period 1995-2005). Racial disparities were quantified using both relative (RR) and absolute (RD) statistics that account for the population size and correct for unreliable rates typically observed for minority groups and smaller geographic units. Results were then correlated with socio-economic status measured by the percentage of habitants living below the poverty level.\n-RESULTS: African-American and Hispanic women generally experience higher mortality than White non-Hispanics, and these differences are especially significant in the southeast metropolitan areas and southwest border of Texas. The proportion and location of significant racial disparities however changed depending on the type of statistic (RR versus RD) and the geographic level. The largest proportion of significant results was observed for the RD statistic and census tract data. Geographic regions with significant racial disparities for African-Americans and Hispanics frequently had a poverty rate above 10.00%.'}]

yes

The study found that racial disparities in breast cancer mortality among African-American and Hispanic women compared to White non-Hispanic women in Texas varied depending on the geographic scale (census tract, zip code, and county) and the type of statistic used (relative risk or absolute difference).

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes the leukocyte count correlate with the severity of injury?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow coma score (GCS), and revised trauma score (RTS) are the most frequently used methods to evaluate the severity of injury in blunt trauma patients. ISS is too complicated to assess easily and GCS and RTS are easy to assess but somewhat subjective. White blood cell count (WBC) is an easy, quick and objective test. This study was performed to evaluate the significance of the WBC count at presentation in the blunt trauma patients.\n-METHODS: 713 blunt trauma patients, who were admitted to the Uludag University Medical Center Emergency Department between 01.04.2000-31.12.2000, were retrospectively evaluated in terms of ISS, GCS, RTS and white blood cell count at presentation.\n-RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed that WBC was correlated positively with ISS, but negatively with GCS and RTS.'}]

yes

The white blood cell count (WBC) is correlated positively with the injury severity score (ISS), but negatively with the Glasgow coma score (GCS) and revised trauma score (RTS), indicating that the WBC count is related to the severity of injury.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nCan transcranial direct current stimulation be useful in differentiating unresponsive wakefulness syndrome from minimally conscious state patients?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: Disorders of consciousness (DOC) diagnosis relies on the presence or absence of purposeful motor responsiveness, which characterizes the minimally conscious state (MCS) and the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), respectively. Functional neuroimaging studies have raised the question of possible residual conscious awareness also in clinically-defined UWS patients. The aim of our study was to identify electrophysiological parameters, by means of a transcranial magnetic stimulation approach, which might potentially express the presence of residual networks sustaining fragmentary behavioral patterns, even when no conscious behavior can be observed.\n-METHODS: We enrolled 25 severe DOC patients, following post-anoxic or traumatic brain injury and 20 healthy individuals (HC) as control group. Baseline electrophysiological evaluation evidenced, in comparison to HC, a partial preservation of cortical effective connectivity and excitability in clinically defined MCS, whereas these components were absent in clinically defined UWS. Then, we applied an anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) protocol over the orbitofrontal cortex.\n-RESULT: a-tDCS was able to boost cortical connectivity and excitability in all HC, MCS, and to unmask such excitability/connectivity in some UWS patients.'}]

yes

Transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) was able to boost cortical connectivity and excitability in all healthy controls and minimally conscious state patients, and to unmask such excitability/connectivity in some unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAromatase inhibitor-related musculoskeletal symptoms: is preventing osteoporosis the key to eliminating these symptoms?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are an effective treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, patients receiving AIs report a higher incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and bone fractures; the mechanism and risk factors for this correlation are not well studied. The aim of this study was to correlate these musculoskeletal symptoms and bone fractures in patients receiving AIs with bone mineral density (BMD), previous tamoxifen use, and administration of calcium/bisphosphonate (Ca/Bis).\n-PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed charts of 856 patients with hormone receptor-positive nonmetastatic breast cancer seen at our institution between January 1999 and October 2007. A total of 316 patients met the inclusion criteria of treatment with one of the AIs for>or = 3 months and availability of a dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) during this treatment. Arthralgia, generalized bone pain and/or myalgia, bone fracture after beginning AIs, any tamoxifen treatment, and Ca/Bis therapy were recorded.\n-RESULTS: Our study demonstrates a significant association between symptoms and DEXA-BMD results (P<.001). Similarly, the group receiving tamoxifen before AIs had fewer patients with arthralgia or generalized bone pain/myalgia or bone fracture (P<.001). Furthermore, the group receiving AIs plus Ca/Bis had more patients without musculoskeletal symptoms and had fewer fractures. Finally, the group receiving steroidal AIs compared with nonsteroidal AIs had more patients with arthralgia or generalized bone pain and/or myalgia, and bone fractures (P<.001).'}]

yes

Preventing osteoporosis by administering calcium/bisphosphonate (Ca/Bis) therapy is associated with a lower incidence of aromatase inhibitor-related musculoskeletal symptoms and bone fractures.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nCould different follow-up modalities play a role in the diagnosis of asymptomatic endometrial cancer relapses?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To determine current practice and to assess the value of routine follow-up procedures for endometrial cancer surveillance. To discuss whether such procedures are feasible and effective to identify asymptomatic recurrences and describe the pattern of relapse detected by procedures.\n-METHODS: The records of 282 consecutive women with recurrent endometrial cancer treated from 1986 to 2005 were retrospectively collected in 8 Italian institutions. Primary disease, clinical history, and recurrence features and data were analyzed.\n-RESULTS: Thirty-five (12.4%) of 282 patients had recurrence in vaginal vault, 51 patients (18.0%) had recurrence in central pelvis, 14 patients (4.9%) had recurrence in pelvic wall, and 39 patients (13.8%) had recurrence in lymph nodes. One-hundred twenty-eight patients (45.3%) showed a distant relapse, whereas 15 patients (5.3%) developed both distant relapse and local relapse. The site of relapse influenced survival because the patients with vaginal vault recurrences lived significantly longer than the patients with recurrences in other sites. Eighty (28.4%) of the 282 patients became symptomatic and anticipated the scheduled visit, 37 (13.1 %) of the patients reported their symptoms during the follow-up meeting, and 165 (58.5 %) of the patients were asymptomatic and the diagnostic path was introduced by a planned visit or examination. Among the asymptomatic patients, the first procedure that led to further examinations was clinical visit alone for 60 (36.4%) of 165 patients, imaging for 103 patients (62.4%), and cytologic examination for 2 patients (1.2%). Symptoms at recurrence can predict survival: patients with an asymptomatic recurrence had a median survival time from relapse of 35 months versus 13 months if they had a symptomatic repetition (P = 0.0001).'}]

yes

Different follow-up modalities, such as clinical visit alone, imaging, and cytologic examination, played a role in the diagnosis of asymptomatic endometrial cancer relapses.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nLocoregional opening of the rodent blood-brain barrier for paclitaxel using Nd:YAG laser-induced thermo therapy: a new concept of adjuvant glioma therapy?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nd:YAG laser-induced thermo therapy (LITT) of rat brains is associated with blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability changes. We address the question of whether LITT-induced locoregional disruption of the BBB could possibly allow a locoregional passage of chemotherapeutic agents into brain tissue to treat malignant glioma.STUDY DESIGN/\n-MATERIALS AND METHODS: CD Fischer rats were subject to LITT of the left forebrain. Disruption of the BBB was analyzed using Evans blue and immunohistochemistry (IH). Animals were perfused with paclitaxel, and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was employed to analyze the content of paclitaxel in brain and plasma samples.\n-RESULTS: LITT induces an opening of the BBB as demonstrated by locoregional extravasation of Evans blue, C3C, fibrinogen, and IgM. HPLC proved the passage of paclitaxel across the disrupted BBB.'}]

yes

Nd:YAG laser-induced thermo therapy (LITT) of rat brains induces an opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), allowing a locoregional passage of chemotherapeutic agents, such as paclitaxel, into brain tissue.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nPreoperative tracheobronchoscopy in newborns with esophageal atresia: does it matter?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: Despite surgical refinements, perioperative use of tracheobronchoscopy (TBS) as part of surgical approach to esophageal atresia (EA) is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of preoperative TBS in newborns with EA in preventing complications and improving diagnosis and surgical treatment.\n-METHODS: In the period ranging from 1997 to 2003, 62 patients with EA underwent preoperative TBS. The procedure was carried out with flexible bronchoscope maintaining spontaneous breathing. When a wide carinal fistula was found, this was mechanically occluded by Fogarty catheter and cannulated with rigid bronchoscopy. Type of EA, surgical procedure variations caused by TBS, and associated anomalies not easily detectable were recorded.\n-RESULTS: Before TBS, the Gross classification of the 62 patients was as follows: type A, 9 patients; type B, none; type C, 51 patients. At TBS, however, 3 of 9 type A patients had an unsuspected proximal fistula (type B). These 3 patients, plus the 2 with H-type fistula, were repaired through a cervical approach. In 4 patients, previously undetected malformations of the respiratory tree (2 aberrant right upper bronchus and 2 hypoplastic bronchi) were found at TBS. Carinal fistulas in 14 type C patients were occluded by Fogarty catheter to improve ventilation during repair. No complications were observed. Overall, TBS was clinically useful in 28 (45.2%) of 62 patients, including 15 (24.2%) of 62 infants in whom it was crucial in modifying the surgical approach.'}]

yes

Preoperative tracheobronchoscopy in newborns with esophageal atresia was clinically useful in 45.2% of patients, including 24.2% of infants in whom it was crucial in modifying the surgical approach.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs horizontal semicircular canal ocular reflex influenced by otolith organs input?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether horizontal canal ocular reflex is influenced by otolith organs input.\n-METHODS: The subjects were seven healthy humans. The right ear was stimulated using ice-water. Each subject was kept in a left-ear-down position for 20 s and then repositioned to a prone position, a right-ear-down position and a supine position with 20 s intervals. Nystagmus was analysed using three-dimensional video-oculography.\n-RESULTS: Eye movements in the supine position and the prone position were not in a symmetric fashion. Nystagmus in the left-ear-down position and the right-ear-down position were not symmetric either. These phenomena indicate that the axis of the eyeball rotation was affected by the shift of the direction of gravity exerted on the head.'}]

yes

The study found that nystagmus in the left-ear-down position and the right-ear-down position were not symmetric, indicating that the axis of the eyeball rotation was affected by the shift of the direction of gravity exerted on the head, which suggests that otolith organs input influences horizontal semicircular canal ocular reflex.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs perforation of the appendix a risk factor for tubal infertility and ectopic pregnancy?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To critically assess the evidence that appendiceal perforation is a risk factor for subsequent tubal infertility or ectopic pregnancy.\n-DATA SOURCES: Epidemiologic studies investigating the relationship between appendectomy and infertility or ectopic pregnancy were identified by searching the MEDLINE database from 1966 to 1997. Appropriate citations were also extracted from a manual search of the bibliographies of selected papers.\n-STUDY SELECTION: Twenty-three articles were retrieved. Only 4 presented original data including comparisons to a nonexposed control group and they form the basis for this study.\n-DATA EXTRACTION: Because the raw data or specific techniques of data analysis were not always explicitly described, indices of risk for exposure were extracted from the data as presented and were analysed without attempting to convert them to a common measure.\n-DATA SYNTHESIS: Articles were assessed according to the criteria of the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group for evaluating articles on harm. Review of the literature yielded estimates of the risk of adverse fertility outcomes ranging from 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 2.5) for ectopic pregnancy after an appendectomy to 4.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 14.9) for tubal infertility from perforation of the appendix. Recall bias, and poor adjustment for confounding variables in some reports, weakened the validity of the studies.'}]

yes

The studies reviewed in this paper estimate that the risk of adverse fertility outcomes, such as tubal infertility and ectopic pregnancy, after an appendectomy is increased, with estimates ranging from 1.6 to 4.8, but the validity of the studies is weakened by recall bias and poor adjustment for confounding variables.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nSerovar specific immunity to Neisseria gonorrhoeae: does it exist?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the host immune response to gonorrhoea provides limited serovar specific protection from reinfection.\n-SUBJECTS: 508 episodes of gonorrhoea diagnosed at a city centre genitourinary medicine clinic including 22 patients with multiple infections over a 4 year period.\n-METHODS: Patients with recurrent gonococcal infection were analysed with respect to the initial and subsequent serovars isolated.\n-RESULTS: No significant difference was seen in the prevalence of serovars isolated following a repeat infection compared with those without repeat infections. The site of the initial infection did not appear to influence the subsequent serovar isolated.'}]

no

No significant difference was seen in the prevalence of serovars isolated following a repeat infection compared with those without repeat infections.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nMay student examiners be reasonable substitute examiners for faculty in an undergraduate OSCE on medical emergencies?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of student examiners (SE) to that of faculty examiners (FE) on examinee performance in an OSCE as well as on post-assessment evaluation in the area of emergency medicine management.\n-METHODS: An OSCE test-format (seven stations: Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), Basic Life Support (BLS), Trauma-Management (TM), Pediatric-Emergencies (PE), Acute-Coronary-Syndrome (ACS), Airway-Management (AM), and Obstetrical-Emergencies (OE)) was administered to 207 medical students in their third year of training after they had received didactics in emergency medicine management. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two simultaneously run tracks: either with SE (n = 110) or with FE (n = 98). Students were asked to rate each OSCE station and to provide their overall OSCE perception by means of a standardized questionnaire. The independent samples t-test was used and effect sizes were calculated (Cohens d).\n-RESULTS: Students achieved significantly higher scores for the OSCE stations "TM", "AM", and "OE" as well as "overall OSCE score" in the SE track, whereas the station score for "PE" was significantly higher for students in the FE track. Mostly small effect sizes were reported. In the post-assessment evaluation portion of the study, students gave significant higher ratings for the ACS station and "overall OSCE evaluation" in the FE track; also with small effect sizes.'}]

yes

Student examiners were found to be a reasonable substitute for faculty examiners in an undergraduate OSCE on medical emergencies, as students achieved significantly higher scores in some stations and overall OSCE score in the SE track, with mostly small effect sizes.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre endothelial cell patterns of astrocytomas indicative of grade?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: The most common primary brain tumors in children and adults are of astrocytic origin. Classic histologic grading schemes for astrocytomas have included evaluating the presence or absence of nuclear abnormalities, mitoses, vascular endothelial proliferation, and tumor necrosis.\n-MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the vascular pattern of 17 astrocytoma surgical specimens (seven from children and 10 from adults), and four normal brains obtained at autopsy, utilizing antibody to glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) utilizing confocal microscopy. A modified WHO classification was used.\n-RESULTS: All tumor cases showed cells positive for GFAP. Control tissues showed a few, widely separated vessels. Pilocytic astrocytomas (four cases) showed lacy clusters of small-to-medium sized vessels, with intact vessel wall integrity. Diffuse, low grade astrocytoma (three cases) showed a staining pattern similar to control tissue; intermediate grade (one case), anaplastic astrocytoma (three cases) and gliobastoma multiforme (six cases) showed an increased vessel density with multiple small vessels (glomeruloid clusters), some with prominent intimal hyperplasia, loss of vessel wall integrity, and with numerous vWF-positive single cells/microvessels within the tumor substance.'}]

yes

The endothelial cell patterns of astrocytomas are indicative of grade, with different grades showing distinct vascular patterns, such as lacy clusters of small-to-medium sized vessels in pilocytic astrocytomas, and increased vessel density with multiple small vessels and loss of vessel wall integrity in higher-grade tumors.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDo healthier lifestyles lead to less utilization of healthcare resources?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Governments are urged to determine methods to control the use of medical resources and curb the rise of healthcare costs. The question is, do health behaviors have an impact on the use of medical resources? This study aims to identify and understand the difference in the number of outpatient visits and health examinations based on various health behaviors and to determine whether patients seek medical care for illness from the same physicians.\n-METHODS: This study used the dataset derived from the Department of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of Kaohsiung, Taiwan in 2005. Persons older than 15\xa0years were surveyed using an on-site questionnaire. A total of 2911 persons were enrolled in this study. Independent t-tests, chi-square tests, one-way ANOVA, multiple linear regression and binominal logistic regression were used in the data analysis.\n-RESULTS: The regression model for the frequency of doctor visits, health examinations, and whether the same physician is sought for medical care has demonstrated significant correlations with gender, age and education-level variables. Four health behaviors (i.e., exercise habits, dietary habits, regular blood pressure measurement, drinking habits) exhibited a significant correlation with healthcare utilization (P<0.05).'}]

yes

The study found that four health behaviors (exercise habits, dietary habits, regular blood pressure measurement, and drinking habits) exhibited a significant correlation with healthcare utilization, suggesting that healthier lifestyles can lead to less utilization of healthcare resources.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAntral follicle assessment as a tool for predicting outcome in IVF--is it a better predictor than age and FSH?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if baseline antral follicle assessment may serve as additional information in predicting in vitro fertilization outcome.\n-METHODS: Prospective, descriptive preliminary study of in vitro fertilization outcome. From July 1998 to July 1999, 224 patients underwent antral follicle assessment (follicle 2-6 mm in diameter) on baseline of the planned, stimulated in vitro fertilization cycle. The outcomes were analyzed with respect to antral follicle assessment (<or = 6 or>6), basal cycle day 3 follicle stimulated hormone (<or = 10 or>10 IU/L) and maternal age (<or = 35 or>35 years).\n-RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the group with baseline antral follicle>6 compared to that in the group with antral follicle<or = 6 (51% vs. 19%, respectively). Controlling for patient age, and basal follicle stimulated hormone, the pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the group with antral follicle>6 compared to that in the group with antral follicle<or = 6. The cancellation rate was significantly increased with advancing maternal age, elevated basal follicle stimulated hormone levels, and baseline antral follicle<or = 6. The cancellation rate was significantly higher in the group with antral follicle<or = 6 compared to that in the group with antral follicle>or = 6 (33% vs. 1%, respectively).'}]

yes

The study found that baseline antral follicle assessment was a better predictor of IVF outcome than age and FSH, as the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the group with antral follicle >6 compared to that in the group with antral follicle <or = 6.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDo all ethnic groups in New Zealand exhibit socio-economic mortality gradients?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVES: First, to establish whether a deprivation gradient in all-cause mortality exists for all ethnic groups within New Zealand; second, if such gradients do exist, whether their absolute slopes are the same; and third, if such gradients exist, what impact the unequal deprivation distributions of the different ethnic groups have on the observed ethnic inequalities in life expectancy at birth.\n-METHOD: Abridged lifetables for the period 1999-2003 were constructed using standard demographic methods for each of four ethnic groups (Asian, Pacific, Maori and European) by NZDep2001 quintile and sex. Gradients were estimated by fitting generalised linear models to the quintile-specific life expectancy estimates for each ethnic group (by sex). The contribution of variation in deprivation distributions to inter-ethnic inequalities in life expectancy was estimated by re-weighting the quintile-specific mortality rates for each ethnic group using weights derived from the European deprivation distribution and recalculating the lifetable.\n-RESULTS: All four ethnic groups exhibit deprivation gradients in all-cause mortality (life expectancy). Maori show the steepest gradients, with slopes approximately 25% steeper than those of Europeans for both males and females. By contrast, gradients among Asian and Pacific peoples are shallower than those of their European counterparts.'}]

yes

All four ethnic groups in New Zealand exhibit deprivation gradients in all-cause mortality (life expectancy).

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nCan normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental replacement can be an alternative to tibial osteotomy in younger, active patients with unicompartmental knee disease. In unicompartmental replacement, the other compartments and knee ligaments are largely untouched. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the knee kinematics after unicompartmental replacement may also be unchanged. To test this hypothesis, knee kinematics and quadriceps tension were recorded before and after replacement with a unicompartmental design and then with a tricompartmental design.\n-METHODS: Six human cadaver knees were tested before implantation, after implantation with a bicruciate-retaining unicompartmental knee prosthesis, and after implantation with a posterior cruciate-retaining tricompartmental knee prosthesis. The unicompartmental prosthesis was initially implanted, and it was then revised to a total condylar knee replacement. The knee kinematics were measured with use of an electromagnetic tracking device while the knee was put through dynamic simulated stair-climbing under peak flexion moments of approximately 40 N-m. Quadriceps tension was also measured for all three conditions.\n-RESULTS: No significant differences in tibial axial rotation were noted between the intact and unicompartmental conditions. However, tricompartmental replacement significantly affected tibial axial rotation (p = 0.001). Femoral rollback was not significantly affected by either unicompartmental or tricompartmental arthroplasty. Quadriceps tension was also similar among all three conditions.'}]

yes

No significant differences in tibial axial rotation were noted between the intact and unicompartmental conditions, and femoral rollback was not significantly affected by unicompartmental arthroplasty.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre serum leptin levels a prognostic factor in advanced lung cancer?\n\nContext:\n-MATERIAL AND METHODS: There are 71 previously untreated patients with cytological or histological evidence of primary lung cancer who were admitted to the oncology department between November 2013 and August 2014. Forty-five healthy individuals with age, sex and BMI matching the lung cancer patients, were recruited to take part in the study as a control group. Leptin levels were measured quantitatively by using a microELISA kit.\n-RESULTS: The serum leptin levels at diagnosis were significantly lower in lung cancer patients than those in control subjects (4.75±4.91 ng/ml, 9.67±8.02 ng/ml; p<0.001). We did not find any significant difference in leptin values related to clinicopathological parameters such as ECOG PS, weight loss, histological type, disease stage and TNM classification. Nevertheless, we demonstrated a significant correlation between serum leptin levels and BMI in lung cancer patients (correlation coefficient: 0.303; p>0.010). The analysis of serum leptin values did not show any association with the overall survival of the patients.'}]

no

The analysis of serum leptin values did not show any association with the overall survival of the patients.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs fetal gender associated with emergency department visits for asthma during pregnancy?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: To investigate if fetal gender (1) affects the risk of having an emergency department (ED) visit for asthma; and (2) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes among women who had at least one visit to the ED for asthma during pregnancy.\n-METHODS: We linked two provincial administrative databases containing records on in-patient deliveries and ED visits. The study sample included women who delivered a live singleton baby between April 2003 and March 2004. Pregnant women who made at least one ED visit for asthma were counted as cases and the rest of the women as control subjects. We performed a multivariable analysis using logistic regression to model the risk of having an ED visit for asthma, with fetal gender being one of the predictors. In addition, a series of multivariable logistic regressions were also constructed separately for cases and controls for the following adverse delivery outcomes: low birth weight baby, preterm delivery, and delivery via Caesarian section.\n-RESULTS: Among 109,173 live singleton deliveries, 530 women had visited ED due to asthma during pregnancy. While having an ED visit for asthma was positively associated with teenage pregnancy, low income, and presence of pregnancy-induced hypertension, it was not associated with fetal gender (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85-1.19). Fetal gender was not a significant predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women who had an asthma ED visit during pregnancy.'}]

no

Fetal gender is not associated with emergency department visits for asthma during pregnancy, as indicated by the non-significant predictor value of fetal gender in the multivariable analysis (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85-1.19).

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nStretch-sensitive KCNQ1 mutation A link between genetic and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate mutations in genes encoding the slow component of the cardiac delayed rectifier K+ current (I(Ks)) channel in familial atrial fibrillation (AF).\n-BACKGROUND: Although AF can have a genetic etiology, links between inherited gene defects and acquired factors such as atrial stretch have not been explored.\n-METHODS: Mutation screening of the KCNQ1, KCNE1, KCNE2, and KCNE3 genes was performed in 50 families with AF. The effects of mutant protein on cardiac I(Ks) activation were evaluated using electrophysiological studies and human atrial action potential modeling.\n-RESULTS: One missense KCNQ1 mutation, R14C, was identified in 1 family with a high prevalence of hypertension. Atrial fibrillation was present only in older individuals who had developed atrial dilation and who were genotype positive. Patch-clamp studies of wild-type or R14C KCNQ1 expressed with KCNE1 in CHO cells showed no statistically significant differences between wild-type and mutant channel kinetics at baseline, or after activation of adenylate cyclase with forskolin. After exposure to hypotonic solution to elicit cell swelling/stretch, mutant channels showed a marked increase in current, a leftward shift in the voltage dependence of activation, altered channel kinetics, and shortening of the modeled atrial action potential duration.'}]

yes

A stretch-sensitive KCNQ1 mutation, R14C, was identified in a family with a high prevalence of hypertension, and atrial fibrillation was present only in older individuals who had developed atrial dilation and were genotype positive.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre adult body circumferences associated with height?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Weight scales as height squared, which is an observation that forms the basis of body mass index (weight/height(2)). If, and how, circumferences, including waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC), scale to height remains unclear, but this is an important consideration when developing normative ranges or applying WC/height and HC/height as risk indexes.\n-OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to examine the scaling of weight, WC, and HC to height in NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) III participants.\n-DESIGN: Subjects were adult non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Mexican American men (n = 7422) and nonpregnant women (n = 7999) who had complete demographic and anthropometric data. In addition to height, allometric models were developed for each measure that controlled for age, race, and self-reported health status.\n-RESULTS: After adjustment for age and race, weight scaled to height in men and women with mean (±SEE) powers of 2.29 ± 0.11 and 1.80 ± 0.07, respectively (both P<0.001). Although univariate circumference-height models were weak or nonsignificant, when adjusted for age and race WC and HC scaled to height with powers of 0.76 ± 0.08 and 0.45 ± 0.05, respectively, in men and 0.80 ± 0.05 and 0.53 ± 0.04, respectively, in women (all P<0.001). Age- and race-adjusted incremental increases in circumferences ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 cm per centimeter increase in height. Both WC/height and HC/height scaled negatively to height in men and women, and WC/HC scaled negatively to height in women only (all P<0.001). Health status-adjusted models were similar.'}]

yes

Yes, adult body circumferences are associated with height, as waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC) scaled to height with powers of 0.76 ± 0.08 and 0.45 ± 0.05 in men, and 0.80 ± 0.05 and 0.53 ± 0.04 in women, after adjustment for age and race.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nWould corrected QT dispersion predict left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients?\n\nContext:\n-AIMS: We explored whether QT corrected dispersion (QTcD) can identify left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensives.\n-METHODS: We enrolled 100 hypertensive patients (study group) and 30 normotensive subjects (control group). Echocardiography was performed to measure left ventricular mass and left ventricular mass index. Electrocardiogram was performed to measure QTcD.\n-RESULTS: LVH was present in 42 patients (42%) of the study group, none among controls. Hypertensive patients had significantly greater indices of LVH and QTcD compared with controls (p<0.001 for all). Similarly, among hypertensive patients, those with LVH had a significantly greater QTcD compared with those without (p<0.001). Pearson\'s correlation coefficient test demonstrated strongly positive correlations between QTcD and the indices of LVH (p<0.001 for all). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves identified 60 ms as the optimal cut-off value of QTcD that best predicts LVH in hypertensives. Using this value, QTcD was able to predict LVH with a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity 98.2%.'}]

yes

Corrected QT dispersion (QTcD) can predict left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensive patients, with a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 98.2% using a cut-off value of 60 ms.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nTraumatic aortic injury: does the anatomy of the aortic arch influence aortic trauma severity?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: Traumatic aortic injury (TAI) is a rare but life-threatening type of injury. We investigate whether the anatomy of the aortic arch influences the severity of aortic injury.\n-METHODS: This is a retrospective study of twenty-two cases treated with TEVAR for TAI in our department from 2009 to 2014. Aortic injury was assessed in accordance with the recommendations of the Society of Vascular Surgery. We measured the aortic arch angle and the aortic arch index, based on the initial angio-CT scan, in each of the analyzed cases.\n-RESULTS: The mean aortic arch index and mean aortic arch angle were 6.8\xa0cm and 58.3°, respectively, in the type I injury group; 4.4\xa0cm and 45.9° in the type III group; 3.3\xa0cm and 37° in the type IV group. There were substantial differences in both the aortic arch index and the aortic arch angle of the type III and IV groups. A multivariate analysis confirmed that the aortic arch angle was significantly associated with the occurrence of type III damage (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.03-2.2).'}]

yes

The anatomy of the aortic arch, specifically the aortic arch angle, influences the severity of aortic injury, with a larger angle associated with a higher likelihood of type III damage.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nInpatient versus outpatient management of neutropenic fever in gynecologic oncology patients: is risk stratification useful?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of risk stratification of gynecologic oncology patients with neutropenic fever (NF).\n-METHODS: A retrospective chart review of gynecologic cancer patients admitted with NF from 2007 to 2011 was performed, wherein demographic, oncologic, and NF characteristics (hospitalization length, complications, and death) were collected. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index score was calculated; low risk was considered ≥ 21. SAS 9.2 was used for statistical analyses.\n-RESULTS: Eighty-three patients met the study criteria. Most (92%) were Caucasian and had advanced stage disease (71%). Primary tumors were 58% ovary, 35% endometrium, and 6% cervix. All patients were receiving chemotherapy on admission (72% for primary, 28% for recurrent disease). Forty-eight percent had a positive culture, and most (58%) positive cultures were urine. Seventy-six percent of patients were considered low risk. High-risk patients were more likely to have a severe complication (10% versus 50%, p=0.0003), multiple severe complications (3% versus 20%, p=0.0278), ICU admission (2% versus 40%, p<0.0001), overall mortality (2% versus 15%, p=0.0417), and death due to neutropenic fever (0% versus 15%, p=0.0124). MASCC had a positive predictive value of 50% and negative predictive value of 90%. The median MASCC score for all patients was 22 (range, 11-26), but the median MASCC score for those with death or a severe complication was 17 (range, 11-24).'}]

yes

Risk stratification using the MASCC risk index score is useful in gynecologic oncology patients with neutropenic fever, as high-risk patients were more likely to have severe complications, ICU admission, overall mortality, and death due to neutropenic fever.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nShould chest wall irradiation be included after mastectomy and negative node breast cancer?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate local failure patterns in node negative breast cancer patients treated with post-mastectomy radiotherapy including internal mammary chain only.\n-PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 92 internal or central-breast node-negative tumours with mastectomy and external irradiation of the internal mammary chain at the dose of 50 Gy, from 1994 to 1998.\n-RESULTS: Local recurrence rate was 5 % (five cases). Recurrence sites were the operative scare and chest wall. Factors associated with increased risk of local failure were age<or = 40 years and tumour size greater than 20mm, without statistical significance.'}]

yes

The study found that the local recurrence rate was 5% and recurrence sites were the operative scar and chest wall, suggesting that chest wall irradiation should be included after mastectomy and negative node breast cancer to reduce the risk of local failure.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nCan bisphosphonate treatment be stopped in a growing child with skeletal fragility?\n\nContext:\n-UNLABELLED: Cyclical pamidronate therapy in a 2-year-old child with skeletal fragility resulted in remodelling of vertebral fractures and improvement in bone mineral density (BMD) at distal radial and spinal sites. The BMD at both sites decreased precipitously within 24 months of stopping treatment, raising the question as to whether bisphosphonates can be stopped in a growing child with skeletal fragility.\n-INTRODUCTION: At age 23 months, a male toddler sustained a low trauma fracture of his right femur. Skeletal radiographs revealed generalised osteopenia with multiple vertebral body fractures. He was diagnosed with type IV osteogenesis imperfecta; however, no mutations were found in COL1A1 or COL1A2 genes.\n-METHODS: This case report presents bone densitometry data before, during and after bisphosphonate treatment. Axial QCT was main outcome from 2 years of age; DXA and pQCT were taken after age 5.\n-RESULTS: QCT confirmed that he had low spinal trabecular volumetric BMD (Z-score -2.4). After 4 years of treatment his vertebral fractures had been remodelled and all bone densitometry values (QCT, DXA and pQCT) were within normal range and therefore treatment was discontinued. Shortly after this he suffered stress fractures of his left mid tibia and at the sclerotic metaphyseal line corresponding to his first APD treatment. He had marked reduction in spinal trabecular and distal radial vBMD; change in BMAD was less marked.'}]

no

Treatment was discontinued after 4 years, but shortly after, the child suffered stress fractures, indicating that bisphosphonate treatment should not be stopped in a growing child with skeletal fragility.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nRegional anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia for surgery in geriatric patients with hip fracture: does it decrease morbidity, mortality, and health care costs?\n\nContext:\n-INTRODUCTION: Hip fracture in geriatric patients has a substantial economic impact and represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. At our institution, a regional anesthesia program was instituted for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. This retrospective cohort review examines the effects of regional anesthesia (from mainly after July 2007) vs general anesthesia (mainly prior to July 2007) on morbidity, mortality and hospitalization costs.\n-METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved data collection from electronic and paper charts of 308 patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture from September 2006 to December 2008. Data on postoperative morbidity, in-patient mortality, and cost of hospitalization (as estimated from data on hospital charges) were collected and analyzed. Seventy-three patients received regional anesthesia and 235 patients received general anesthesia. During July 2007, approximately halfway through the study period, a regional anesthesia and analgesia program was introduced.\n-RESULTS: The average cost of hospitalization in patients who received surgery for hip fracture was no different between patients who receive regional or general anesthesia ($16,789 + 631 vs $16,815 + 643, respectively, P = 0.9557). Delay in surgery and intensive care unit (ICU) admission resulted in significantly higher hospitalization costs. Age, male gender, African American race and ICU admission were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality and rates of readmission are not statistically different between the two anesthesia groups.'}]

no

The use of regional anesthesia as compared to general anesthesia for surgery in geriatric patients with hip fracture does not decrease morbidity, mortality, and health care costs.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes blood pressure change in treated hypertensive patients depending on whether it is measured by a physician or a nurse?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there are differences between blood pressure (BP) measured by the nurse (NBP), BP measured by the physician (PBP) and self-measured BP in treated hypertensive patients and, if found, to evaluate their clinical importance.\n-METHOD: An observational study is carried out with hypertensive patients recruited from two village-based community health centres in Catalonia (Spain) serving an area with a total population of 2800 inhabitants. All patients treated for hypertension visiting the health centre on a specific day of the week and during the same timetable between October 2000 and May 2001 were included.\n-RESULTS: The difference between physician-systolic BP and nurse-systolic BP was 5.16 mmHg (95% CI 2.62-7.7; p<0.001). The difference between physician-systolic BP and self-measured systolic BP was 4.67 mmHg (95% CI 0.89-8.44; p=0.016). The differences between nurse-systolic BP and self-measured systolic BP were not significant (0.49 mmHg; 95% CI 3.71-2.71; p=0.758). With regards to diastolic BP, no significant differences were found between the different ways of measurement. NBP gave the following values: sensitivity (Sn) of 92% and specificity (Sp) of 60%; positive predictive value (PPV) of 65.7% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% with a positive coefficient of probability (CP+) of 2.3 and a negative coefficient of probability (CP-) of 0.133. PBP gave the following results: Sn=72%; Sp=66.7%; PPV=64.3%; NPV=74.1%; CP+=2.16 and CP- = 0.420.'}]

yes

The difference between physician-systolic BP and nurse-systolic BP was 5.16 mmHg, indicating that blood pressure can change depending on whether it is measured by a physician or a nurse.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nTreadmill testing of children who have spina bifida and are ambulatory: does peak oxygen uptake reflect maximum oxygen uptake?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have demonstrated low peak oxygen uptake ((.)Vo(2)peak) in children with spina bifida. Low peak heart rate and low peak respiratory exchange ratio in these studies raised questions regarding the true maximal character of (.)Vo(2)peak values obtained with treadmill testing.\n-OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the Vo(2)peak measured during an incremental treadmill test is a true reflection of the maximum oxygen uptake ((.)Vo(2)max) in children who have spina bifida and are ambulatory.\n-DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was used for this study.\n-METHODS: Twenty children who had spina bifida and were ambulatory participated. The (.)Vo(2)peak was measured during a graded treadmill exercise test. The validity of (.)Vo(2)peak measurements was evaluated by use of previously described guidelines for maximum exercise testing in children who are healthy, as well as differences between Vo(2)peak and (.)Vo(2) during a supramaximal protocol ((.)Vo(2)supramaximal).\n-RESULTS: The average values for (.)Vo(2)peak and normalized (.)Vo(2)peak were, respectively, 1.23 L/min (SD=0.6) and 34.1 mL/kg/min (SD=8.3). Fifteen children met at least 2 of the 3 previously described criteria; one child failed to meet any criteria. Although there were no significant differences between (.)Vo(2)peak and Vo(2)supramaximal, 5 children did show improvement during supramaximal testing.\n-LIMITATIONS: These results apply to children who have spina bifida and are at least community ambulatory.'}]

yes

The study found that 15 out of 20 children with spina bifida and ambulatory status met at least 2 of the 3 criteria for maximum exercise testing, suggesting that peak oxygen uptake (Vo(2)peak) measured during an incremental treadmill test is a true reflection of maximum oxygen uptake (Vo(2)max) in these children.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs the probability of prenatal diagnosis or termination of pregnancy different for fetuses with congenital anomalies conceived following assisted reproductive techniques?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To compare the probability of prenatal diagnosis (PND) and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) between fetuses conceived by assisted reproductive techniques (ART) and spontaneously-conceived fetuses with congenital heart defects (CHD).\n-DESIGN: Population-based observational study.\n-SETTING: Paris and surrounding suburbs.\n-POPULATION: Fetuses with CHD in the Paris registry of congenital malformations and cohort of children with CHD (Epicard).\n-METHODS: Comparison of ART-conceived and spontaneously conceived fetuses taking into account potential confounders (maternal characteristics, multiplicity and year of birth or TOPFA).\n-MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Probability and gestational age at PND and TOPFA for ART-conceived versus spontaneously conceived fetuses.\n-RESULTS: The probability of PND (28.1% versus 34.6%, P = 0.077) and TOPFA (36.2% versus 39.2%, P = 0.677) were not statistically different between ART-conceived (n = 171) and spontaneously conceived (n = 4620) fetuses. Estimates were similar after adjustment for potential confounders. Gestational age at PND tended to be earlier for ART fetuses (23.1 versus 24.8 weeks, P = 0.05) but no statistical difference was found after adjustment for confounders. Gestational age at TOPFA was comparable between ART-conceived and spontaneously conceived fetuses.'}]

no

The probability of prenatal diagnosis (PND) and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) were not statistically different between ART-conceived and spontaneously conceived fetuses.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs there a relationship between complex fractionated atrial electrograms recorded during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm fractionation?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may require adjunctive methods of substrate modification. Both ablation-targeting complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) recorded during AF and fractionated electrograms recorded during sinus rhythm (sinus rhythm fractionation [SRF]) have been described. However, the relationship of CFAEs with SRF is unclear.\n-METHODS: Twenty patients (age 62 ± 9 years, 13 males) with persistent AF and 9 control subjects without organic heart disease or AF (age 36 ± 6 years, 4 males) underwent detailed CFAE and SRF left atrial electroanatomic maps. The overlap in left atrial regions with CFAEs and SRF was compared in the AF population, and the distribution of SRF was compared among patients with AF and normal controls. Propagation maps were analyzed to identify the activation patterns associated with SR fractionation.\n-RESULTS: SRF (338 ± 150 points) and CFAE (418 ± 135 points) regions comprised 29% ± 14% and 25% ± 15% of the left atrial surface area, respectively. There was no significant correlation between SRF and CFAE maps (r = .2; P = NS). On comparing patients with AF and controls, no significant difference was found in the distribution of SRF between groups (P = .74). Regions of SRF overlapped areas of wave-front collision 75% ± 13% of the time.'}]

no

There is no significant correlation between complex fractionated atrial electrograms recorded during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm fractionation.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes rural or urban residence make a difference to neonatal outcome in premature birth?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Patients living in rural areas may be at a disadvantage in accessing tertiary health care.AIM: To test the hypothesis that very premature infants born to mothers residing in rural areas have poorer outcomes than those residing in urban areas in the state of New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) despite a coordinated referral and transport system.\n-METHODS: "Rural" or "urban" status was based on the location of maternal residence. Perinatal characteristics, major morbidity and case mix adjusted mortality were compared between 1879 rural and 6775 urban infants<32 weeks gestational age, born in 1992-2002 and admitted to all 10 neonatal intensive care units in NSW and ACT.\n-RESULTS: Rural mothers were more likely to be teenaged, indigenous, and to have had a previous premature birth, prolonged ruptured membrane, and antenatal corticosteroid. Urban mothers were more likely to have had assisted conception and a caesarean section. More urban (93% v 83%) infants were born in a tertiary obstetric hospital. Infants of rural residence had a higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.48, p = 0.005). This trend was consistently seen in all subgroups and significantly for the tertiary hospital born population and the 30-31 weeks gestation subgroup. Regional birth data in this gestational age range also showed a higher stillbirth rate among rural infants (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.32, p<0.001).'}]

yes

Infants of rural residence had a higher mortality compared to urban infants, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.26, indicating a statistically significant difference in neonatal outcome between rural and urban residence in premature birth.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs the use of cyanoacrylate in intestinal anastomosis a good and reliable alternative?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: The present study aims to compare strength, healing, and operation time of experimental intestinal anastomoses performed by polyglactin 910 (Vicryl; Ethicon, Edinburgh, United Kingdom) sutures with ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue (Pattex; Henkel, Dusseldorf, Germany).\n-MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-six Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 2 (groups E and L). Each group was further subdivided into 6 subgroups (EA1, EA2, EA3, EB1, EB2, EB3, LA1, LA2, LA3, LB1, LB2, LB3), each containing 8 rats. Intestinal anastomosis was performed by polyglactin 910 sutures in A subgroups and with ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate in B subgroups. The anastomosis was end to end in A1 and B1, side to side in A2 and B2, and end to side in A3 and B3. Time for anastomosis performance (AT) was recorded. In group E, bursting pressures and hydroxyproline levels were determined on the second postoperative day, whereas in group L, the same measurements were made on the sixth postoperative day. One-way analysis of variance was used for analyses of variance in the groups. Quantitative data were analyzed with Student\'s t test. P value was considered significant at less than .05.\n-RESULTS: There was no significant difference between bursting pressures of subgroup pairs on both postoperative days 2 and 6. Hydroxyproline levels and AT were significantly better in B subgroups.'}]

yes

The use of cyanoacrylate in intestinal anastomosis has been shown to have similar bursting pressures to polyglactin 910 sutures, and better hydroxyproline levels and operation time, indicating it is a good and reliable alternative.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs trabecular bone related to primary stability of miniscrews?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To compare the primary stability of miniscrews inserted into bone blocks of different bone mineral densities (BMDs) with and without cortical bone, and investigate whether some trabecular properties could influence primary stability.\n-MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two bone blocks were extracted from fresh bovine pelvic bone. Four groups were created based on bone type (iliac or pubic region) and presence or absence of cortical bone. Specimens were micro-computed tomography imaged to evaluate trabecular thickness, trabecular number, trabecular separation, bone volume density (BV/TV), BMD, and cortical thickness. Miniscrews 1.4 mm in diameter and 6 mm long were inserted into the bone blocks, and primary stability was evaluated by insertion torque (IT), mini-implant mobility (PTV), and pull-out strength (PS).\n-RESULTS: Intergroup comparison showed lower levels of primary stability when the BMD of trabecular bone was lower and in the absence of cortical bone (P≤.05). The Pearson correlation test showed correlation between trabecular number, trabecular thickness, BV/TV, trabecular BMD, total BMD, and IT, PTV, and PS. There was correlation between cortical thickness and IT and PS (P≤.05).'}]

yes

The study found that trabecular bone properties, such as trabecular number, trabecular thickness, bone volume density (BV/TV), and trabecular BMD, were correlated with primary stability of miniscrews, as evaluated by insertion torque (IT), mini-implant mobility (PTV), and pull-out strength (PS).

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs there any evidence of a "July effect" in patients undergoing major cancer surgery?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: The "July effect" refers to the phenomenon of adverse impacts on patient care arising from the changeover in medical staff that takes place during this month at academic medical centres in North America. There has been some evidence supporting the presence of the July effect, including data from surgical specialties. Uniformity of care, regardless of time of year, is required for patients undergoing major cancer surgery. We therefore sought to perform a population-level assessment for the presence of a July effect in this field.\n-METHODS: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to abstract data on patients undergoing 1 of 8 major cancer surgeries at academic medical centres between Jan. 1, 1999, and Dec. 30, 2009. The primary outcomes examined were postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality. Univariate analyses and subsequently multivariate analyses, controlling for patient and hospital characteristics, were performed to identify whether the time of surgery was an independent predictor of outcome after major cancer surgery.\n-RESULTS: On univariate analysis, the overall postoperative complication rate, as well as genitourinary and hematologic complications specifically, was higher in July than the rest of the year. However, on multivariate analysis, only hematologic complications were significantly higher in July, with no difference in overall postoperative complication rate or in-hospital mortality for all 8 surgeries considered separately or together.'}]

yes

There is evidence of a 'July effect' in patients undergoing major cancer surgery, as the overall postoperative complication rate and hematologic complications were higher in July, but only hematologic complications remained significantly higher on multivariate analysis.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs it necessary to insert a nasobiliary drainage tube routinely after endoscopic clearance of the common bile duct in patients with choledocholithiasis-induced cholangitis?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether a routinely inserted endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube improves the clinical course in patients with choledocholithiasis-induced acute cholangitis after clearance of choledocholithiasis.\n-OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the need for ENBD on the clinical outcomes of patients with acute cholangitis undergoing endoscopic clearance of common bile duct (CBD) stones.\n-DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study.\n-SETTING: Tertiary referral center.\n-PATIENTS: A total of 104 patients with choledocholithiasis-induced acute cholangitis who underwent primary endoscopic treatment were compared according to insertion of an ENBD tube (51 in the ENBD group and 53 in the no-ENBD group).\n-INTERVENTION: Insertion of an ENBD tube after clearance of CBD stones.\n-MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Recurrence of cholangitis and length of hospital stay after clearance of CBD stones.\n-RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between both groups. There were no significant differences in the recurrence rate of cholangitis at 24 weeks (3.9% for the ENBD group vs 3.8% for the no-ENBD group at 24 weeks; P = .99) and length of hospital stay (7.9 days [standard error = 1.2] for the ENBD group vs 7.9 days [standard error = 0.7]for the no-ENBD group; P = .98). However, procedure time was longer (26.2 [SE = 1.8] minutes vs 22.7 [SE = 1.0]minutes, respectively; P = .01) and the discomfort score was higher (4.9 [SE = 0.4] vs 2.8 [SE = 0.3], respectively; P = .02) in the ENBD group than in the no-ENBD group.\n-LIMITATIONS: Single-center study.'}]

no

No, it is not necessary to insert a nasobiliary drainage tube routinely after endoscopic clearance of the common bile duct in patients with choledocholithiasis-induced cholangitis, as there were no significant differences in the recurrence rate of cholangitis and length of hospital stay between the ENBD group and the no-ENBD group.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nStorage of vaccines in the community: weak link in the cold chain?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To assess quality of storage of vaccines in the community.\n-DESIGN: Questionnaire survey of general practices and child health clinics, and monitoring of storage temperatures of selected refrigerators.\n-SETTING: Central Manchester and Bradford health districts.\n-SUBJECTS: 45 general practices and five child health clinics, of which 40 (80%) responded. Eight practices were selected for refrigeration monitoring.\n-MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adherence to Department of Health guidelines for vaccine storage, temperature range to which vaccines were exposed over two weeks.\n-RESULTS: Of the 40 respondents, only 16 were aware of the appropriate storage conditions for the vaccines; eight had minimum and maximum thermometers but only one of these was monitored daily. In six of the eight practices selected for monitoring of refrigeration temperatures the vaccines were exposed to either subzero temperatures (three fridges) or temperatures up to 16 degrees C (three). Two of these were specialised drug storage refrigerators with an incorporated thermostat and external temperature gauges.'}]

yes

The storage of vaccines in the community is a weak link in the cold chain, as only 16 out of 40 respondents were aware of the appropriate storage conditions, and six out of eight monitored practices had vaccines exposed to subzero temperatures or temperatures up to 16 degrees C.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs the clinically positive axilla in breast cancer really a contraindication to sentinel lymph node biopsy?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Clinically positive axillary nodes are widely considered a contraindication to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer, yet no data support this mandate. In fact, data from the era of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) suggest that clinical examination of the axilla is falsely positive in as many as 30% of cases. Here we report the results of SLN biopsy in a selected group of breast cancer patients with palpable axillary nodes classified as either moderately or highly suspicious for metastasis.\n-STUDY DESIGN: Among 2,027 consecutive SLN biopsy procedures performed by two experienced surgeons, clinically suspicious axillary nodes were identified in 106, and categorized as group 1 (asymmetric enlargement of the ipsilateral axillary nodes moderately suspicious for metastasis, n = 62) and group 2 (clinically positive axillary nodes highly suspicious for metastasis, n = 44).\n-RESULTS: Clinical examination of the axilla was inaccurate in 41% of patients (43 of 106) overall, and was falsely positive in 53% of patients (33 of 62) with moderately suspicious nodes and 23% of patients (10 of 44) with highly suspicious nodes. False-positive results were less frequent with larger tumor size (p = 0.002) and higher histologic grade (p = 0.002), but were not associated with age, body mass index, or a previous surgical biopsy.'}]

no

The clinically positive axilla in breast cancer is not always a contraindication to sentinel lymph node biopsy, as clinical examination of the axilla was inaccurate in 41% of patients and falsely positive in 53% of patients with moderately suspicious nodes and 23% of patients with highly suspicious nodes.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nConvulsions and retinal haemorrhage: should we look further?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prevalence of retinal haemorrhages after convulsions is not well established. As these haemorrhages are considered characteristic of child abuse, we investigated their occurrence after convulsive episodes to see whether the finding of haemorrhage should prompt further investigation.\n-METHODS: Prospective study of 153 children (aged 2 months to 2 years), seen in the emergency department after a convulsive episode. After a thorough history and physical examination, a retinal examination was performed by an ophthalmologist. If findings were positive, further investigation was undertaken to rule out systemic disorder or child abuse.\n-RESULTS: One child was found with unilateral retinal haemorrhages following an episode of a simple febrile convulsion. A thorough investigation uncovered no other reason for this finding.'}]

yes

The study found that one child out of 153 had unilateral retinal haemorrhages following a convulsive episode, but a thorough investigation uncovered no other reason for this finding.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre patients willing participants in the new wave of community-based medical education in regional and rural Australia?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: Community-based medical education is growing to meet the increased demand for quality clinical education in expanded settings, and its sustainability relies on patient participation. This study investigated patients\' views on being used as an educational resource for teaching medical students.\n-DESIGN: Questionnaire-based survey.\n-SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending six rural and 11 regional general practices in New South Wales over 18 teaching sessions in November 2008, who consented to student involvement in their consultation.\n-MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient perceptions, expectations and acceptance of medical student involvement in consultations, assessed by surveys before and after their consultations.\n-RESULTS: 118 of 122 patients consented to medical student involvement; of these, 117 (99%) completed a survey before the consultation, and 100 (85%) after the consultation. Patients were overwhelmingly positive about their doctor and practice being involved in student teaching and felt they themselves played an important role. Pre-consultation, patients expressed reluctance to allow students to conduct some or all aspects of the consultation independently. However, after the consultation, they reported they would have accepted higher levels of involvement than actually occurred.'}]

yes

Patients were overwhelmingly positive about their doctor and practice being involved in student teaching and felt they themselves played an important role.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nCan Flexible Instruments Create Adequate Femoral Tunnel Lengths at 90° of Knee Flexion in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: This study aims to study femoral tunnel lengths drilled with a flexible reamer and the distance to important lateral structures obtained by flexing the knee at various angles and by drilling the guide pins arthroscopically to resemble clinical practice. The purpose of this cadaveric study was twofold: 1. to determine whether femoral tunnel lengths of greater than 20 mm can be created with a flexible reamer system at 90 ° of knee flexion and 2. to determine whether the lateral structures of the knee are safe with this technique.\n-METHODS: Ten fresh cadaveric knees were utilized. The intra-osseous length can be measured with a specially de - signed flexible guide pin. Flexible pins were inserted with the knee at 70°, 90°, and 120° of flexion. The intra-osseous length was measured with the measuring device. Each speci - men was dissected around the lateral aspect of the knee to identify the critical structures, the common peroneal nerve, and the LCL. The distance from the guide pins to the com - mon peroneal nerve and femoral attachment of the LCL were measured with a standard flexible paper ruler to the nearest millimeter.\n-RESULTS: There is a trend for progressively increasing mean intra-osseous length associated with increased flexion of the knee. The mean intra-osseous length for 70° flexion was 25.2 mm (20 mm to 32 mm), which was statistically significant when compared to mean intra-osseous lengths of 32.1 mm (22 mm to 45 mm) and 38.0 mm (34 mm to 45 mm) in the 90° and 120° flexion groups, respectively (p<0.05). There were no significant differences among the groups with respect to distance to the LCL. There is a trend toward longer distances to the common peroneal nerve with increased flexion. There was a statistically significant dif - ference when comparing 120° versus 70° (p<0.05).'}]

yes

The study found that flexible instruments can create adequate femoral tunnel lengths at 90° of knee flexion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, with a mean intra-osseous length of 32.1 mm.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nQuality of life in lung cancer patients: does socioeconomic status matter?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: As part of a prospective study on quality of life in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients an investigation was carried out to examine whether there were differences among patients\' quality of life scores and their socioeconomic status.\n-METHODS: Quality of life was measured at two points in time (baseline and three months after initial treatment) using three standard instruments; the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the European Organization for Research and Cancer Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its lung cancer supplement (QLQ-LC13). Socioeconomic status for each individual patient was derived using Carstairs and Morris Deprivation Category ranging from 1 (least deprived) to 7 (most deprived) on the basis of the postcode sector of their address.\n-RESULTS: In all, 129 lung cancer patients entered into the study. Of these data for 82 patients were complete (at baseline and follow-up). 57% of patients were of lower socioeconomic status and they had more health problems, less functioning, and more symptoms as compared to affluent patients. Of these, physical mobility (P = 0.05), energy (P = 0.01), role functioning (P = 0.04), physical functioning (P = 0.03), and breathlessness (P = 0.02) were significant at baseline. However, at follow-up assessment there was no significant difference between patient groups nor did any consistent pattern emerge.'}]

yes

Yes, socioeconomic status matters in the quality of life of lung cancer patients, as patients of lower socioeconomic status had more health problems, less functioning, and more symptoms compared to affluent patients.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover Representative of Bone Histomorphometry in 370 Postmenopausal Women?\n\nContext:\n-CONTEXT: The levels of bone formation and resorption can be assessed at the tissue level by bone histomorphometry on transiliac bone biopsies. Systemic biochemical markers of bone turnover reflect the overall bone formation and resorption at the level of the entire skeleton but cannot discriminate the different skeletal compartments.\n-OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the correlations between the serum biochemical markers of formation and resorption with histomorphometric parameters.\n-DESIGN: We performed post hoc analysis of a previous clinical study.\n-SETTING: Patients were selected from the general population.\n-PATIENTS: A total of 371 untreated postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged 50 to 84 years with a lumbar T-score ≤ -2.5 SD or ≤ -1 SD with at least one osteoporotic fracture.\n-INTERVENTIONS: Transiliac bone biopsies were obtained after a double tetracycline labeling, and blood samples were collected.\n-MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The static and dynamic parameters of formation and bone resorption were measured by histomorphometry. Serum biochemical markers of formation (bone alkaline phosphatase [ALP]; procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide [PINP]) and resorption (C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of collagen type 1 [sCTX]) were assessed.\n-RESULTS: The mean values of biochemical markers were: bone ALP, 15.0 ± 5.2 ng/mL; PINP, 56.2 ± 21.9 μg/mL; and sCTX, 0.58 ± 0.26 ng/mL. Bone ALP and PINP were significantly correlated with both the static and dynamic parameters of formation (0.21 ≤ r\' ≤ 0.36; 0.01 ≥ P ≥ .0001). sCTX was significantly correlated with all resorption parameters (0.18 ≤ r\' ≤ 0.24; 0.02 ≥ P ≥ .0001).'}]

yes

Biochemical markers of bone turnover, such as bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), and C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of collagen type 1 (sCTX), are significantly correlated with histomorphometric parameters of bone formation and resorption in 370 postmenopausal women.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nShould early extubation be the goal for children after congenital cardiac surgery?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the feasibility and assess the clinical outcomes associated with an early extubation strategy for all children undergoing congenital heart surgery, including neonates (age,<30 days).\n-METHODS: We performed a linked database analysis of all patients undergoing congenital heart surgery from July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012. We collected data on the cardiac diagnoses, preoperative status, procedure, and postoperative course, including the duration of invasive and noninvasive ventilation, failure of extubation, hemodynamic data, length of stay, complications, and mortality. A multivariable model was used to assess the independent factors associated with an inability to extubate within the operating room and with delayed extubation (>24 hours).\n-RESULTS: We operated on 613 children, including 97 neonates. Intraoperative extubation was achieved in 71% of the cases and early extubation (≤ 24 hours) was achieved in 89% of the cases. The overall mortality was 1.5% (9 of 613 patients). Early extubation was associated with lower mortality (1% vs 9%, P<.001) and a lower rate of reintubation (4% vs 23%, P<.001) compared with delayed extubation. Notably, 63% of the neonates were extubated within 24 hours, including 67% of arterial switch operations and 54% of total anomalous pulmonary venous return repairs. Norwood operations were the only procedure in which no patient was extubated within the first 24 hours. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that the predictors of delayed extubation included preoperative mechanical ventilation, weight<5 kg, a longer procedure time, and the need for postoperative inotrope support. Implementation of an early extubation strategy was associated with low rates of complications (5.1 per 10 procedures), short lengths of intensive care unit stay (median, 1 day; interquartile range, 1-3), and short hospital stays (median, 4 days; interquartile range, 3-6).'}]

yes

Early extubation was associated with lower mortality and a lower rate of reintubation compared to delayed extubation, and it was successfully implemented in 89% of the cases, with 71% of patients being extubated in the operating room.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes delivery mode affect women\'s postpartum quality of life in rural China?\n\nContext:\n-AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of delivery mode on women\'s postpartum quality of life in rural China and probe factors influencing postnatal quality of life.\n-BACKGROUND: Childbirth significantly affects puerpera\'s physical, psychological and social domains of quality of life. Under the circumstance of increasing high caesarean section rate in rural China, the impact of delivery mode on postnatal quality of life remains unclear.\n-DESIGN: Cross-sectional study design.\n-METHODS: Women residing in rural areas and in their 0-12 months after childbirth from 30 rural townships participated in a household survey. A structured questionnaire was used to evaluate women\'s socio-demographic characteristics, previous pregnant experiences, foetal characteristics and use of maternal health services. The scale for rural postnatal quality of life was adopted to assess postnatal quality of life from six dimensions: physical complaints and pain, sleep and energy, sex satisfaction, interpersonal communication, self-evaluated living stress and perceived life satisfaction.\n-RESULTS: The overall caeserean section rate was 70·0% (962/1375), and most of them (59·7%) were selected by maternal request. None of six dimensions and total score of quality of life displayed significant difference between women with normal delivery and cesaerean section. It was found that postnatal home visit related to good postnatal quality of life and lower husband education level, male gender of infant were associated with poor quality of life.'}]

no

None of six dimensions and total score of quality of life displayed significant difference between women with normal delivery and cesaerean section.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nMenopausal hormone therapy and irregular endometrial bleeding: a potential role for uterine natural killer cells?\n\nContext:\n-CONTEXT: Irregular bleeding affects many users of combined menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and commonly leads to invasive and expensive investigations to exclude underlying malignancy. In most cases no abnormality is found.\n-OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to explore the role of uterine natural killer (uNK) cells and their regulatory cytokine IL-15 in irregular bleeding in HT users.\n-DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study conducted between 2002 and 2004.\n-SETTING: The study was conducted in a tertiary referral menopause clinic at King Edward Memorial Hospital, Western Australia.\n-PATIENTS: Patients included 117 postmenopausal women taking combined HT.\n-INTERVENTIONS: Outpatient endometrial biopsies were taken during and outside bleeding episodes.\n-MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between endometrial uNK cells (CD56+) and bleeding patterns was measured. We also addressed the impact of HT exposure on uNK cell populations, the relationship between endometrial IL-15 expression and uNK cell populations, and killer Ig like receptor genotype in subjects with irregular bleeding.\n-RESULTS: Endometrial CD56+ uNK cells were significantly increased in biopsies obtained during bleeding episodes (P<0.001), compared with HT users with no bleeding. The highest level of IL-15 expression was also seen in biopsies taken during bleeding. No clear relationship between killer Ig like receptor genotype and bleeding on HT was observed.'}]

yes

Endometrial CD56+ uNK cells were significantly increased in biopsies obtained during bleeding episodes, and the highest level of IL-15 expression was also seen in biopsies taken during bleeding.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nPercutaneous ethanol injection for benign cystic thyroid nodules: is aspiration of ethanol-mixed fluid advantageous?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We evaluated the differences between percutaneous ethanol injection with and without aspiration of ethanol-mixed fluid for treatment of benign cystic thyroid nodules.\n-METHODS: We examined 60 patients with benign cystic thyroid nodules confirmed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and divided them into 2 groups according to nonaspiration (group A, n = 30) or aspiration (group B, n = 30) of ethanol-mixed fluid after intracystic ethanol injection. We evaluated in both groups the complete disappearance of the cystic portion of the thyroid nodule on follow-up ultrasonography (first follow-up ultrasonography; mean, 4.6 months in group A; mean, 4.4 months in group B) (chi-square test), side effects or complications during and after the procedure (chi-square test), and the total procedure time (Student t test).\n-RESULTS: Most patients showed complete disappearance of the cystic portion of the thyroid nodule (group A, n = 29; group B, n = 28), and they revealed no recurrence on follow-up ultrasonography. There was no statistical difference in the success rates between group A and group B (P>.05). Pain, the most common side effect, and other mild side effects or complications occurred in small numbers of patients in each group, but there was no significant difference in side effects or complications between the 2 groups (P>.05), except for intracystic hemorrhage (P<.05) and the complaint of all group B patients due to a double puncture (P<.001). The total procedure time was nearly double in group B than in group A because of the additional procedures, such as complete evacuation of the ethanol-mixed fluid and the 10-minute compression.'}]

no

There was no statistical difference in the success rates between group A and group B, and most patients showed complete disappearance of the cystic portion of the thyroid nodule in both groups.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nCan the growth rate of a gallbladder polyp predict a neoplastic polyp?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy for GB polyps that are larger than 10 mm is generally recommended because of the high probability of neoplasm. In contrast, a follow-up strategy is preferred for GB polyps smaller than 10 mm. However, there are no treatment guidelines for polyps that grow in size during the follow-up period.STUDY: We retrospectively investigated 145 patients with GB polyps who underwent at least 1 ultrasonographic follow-up examination over an interval greater than 6 months, before cholecystectomy at Samsung medical center, South Korea, from 1994 to 2007. The growth rate was determined based on the change in size per time interval between 2 ultrasonographic examinations (mm/mo).\n-RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 48 years (range: 25 to 75). One hundred twenty-five non-neoplastic polyps and 20 neoplastic polyps were found. Neoplastic polyps were more frequently found in patients older than 60 years, those with hypertension, a polyp size greater than 10 mm, and a rapid growth rate greater than 0.6 mm/mo. On multivariate analysis, however, the growth rate was not related to the neoplastic nature of a polyp, but older age (>60 y) and large size (>10 mm) were significantly associated with neoplastic polyps.'}]

no

The growth rate of a gallbladder polyp is not related to its neoplastic nature, as determined by multivariate analysis.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre performance measurement systems useful?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Prior literature identified the use of Performance Measurement Systems (PMS) as crucial in addressing improved processes of care. Moreover, a strategic use of PMS has been found to enhance quality, compared to non-strategic use, although a clear understanding of this linkage is still to be achieved. This paper deals with the test of direct and indirect models related to the link between the strategic use of PMS and the level of improved processes in health care organizations. Indirect models were mediated by the degree of perceived managerial discretion.\n-METHODS: A PLS analysis on a survey of 97 Italian managers working for health care organizations in the Lombardy region was conducted. The response rate was 77.6%.\n-RESULTS: The strategic use of PMS in health care organizations directly and significantly (p\u2009<\u20090.001) enhances performance in terms of improved processes. Perceived managerial discretion is positively and significantly (p\u2009<\u20090.001) affected by the strategic use of PMS, whereas the mediation effect is non-significant.'}]

yes

The strategic use of Performance Measurement Systems (PMS) in health care organizations directly and significantly enhances performance in terms of improved processes.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes para-cervical block offer additional advantages in abortion induction with gemeprost in the 2nd trimester?\n\nContext:\n-UNLABELLED: Uterus-specific synthetic Prostaglandin analogues (gemeprost, sulproston etc.) have been widely employed for termination of pregnancy in the second trimester. Since paracervical anaesthesia may be useful during this procedure, we investigated in this prospective randomised study its impact on the clinical course of abortion and pain especially in the late first and second stage of labour.\n-PATIENTS AND METHODS: 20 women scheduled for elective abortion (fetal reasons) between the 16th and 23rd week of gestation were to be given 1 mg gemeprost vaginally every 6 hours. They were allocated at random: 10 women received only Pethidin intravenously and Butylscopolamine rectally, another 10 women were additionally treated by paracervical anaesthesia (2 x 10 ml 0.5% Bupivacain solution) at a cervical dilatation of 2-3 cm.\n-RESULTS: A median of 3 gemeprost applications were administered in both groups. In the group without paracervical anaesthesia the median induction to abortion interval was 20 hours (range: 8-44 hours), 13 hours (range: 8-36 hours, NS) resulting for the paracervical anaesthesia group. The intervals from the last application of prostaglandin until abortion and from 3 cm cervical dilatation to abortion were slightly, but not significantly shorter in the paracervical anaesthesia group. The requirement of Butylscopolamine was higher in the latter group (p<0.05). The requirement of Pethidin and the intensity of pain (measured by pain scale according to Huskisson) especially in the late first stage of labour were not statistically different between both groups. Side effects of paracervical anaesthesia did not occur.'}]

maybe

The use of para-cervical block in abortion induction with gemeprost in the 2nd trimester does not significantly shorten the induction to abortion interval, but it does result in a slightly shorter interval from 3 cm cervical dilatation to abortion and a higher requirement of Butylscopolamine.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes insulin resistance drive the association between hyperglycemia and cardiovascular risk?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown associations between hyperglycemia and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality, yet glucose-lowering treatment does little to mitigate this risk. We examined whether associations between hyperglycemia and CVD risk were explained by underlying insulin resistance.\n-METHODS: In 60 middle-aged individuals without diabetes we studied the associations of fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour post oral glucose tolerance test plasma glucose, insulin sensitivity as well as body fat percentage with CVD risk. Insulin sensitivity was measured as the glucose infusion rate during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, body fat percentage was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry, and CVD risk was estimated using the Framingham risk score. Associations of fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose, insulin sensitivity and body fat percentage with the Framingham risk score were assessed in linear regression models.\n-RESULTS: Both fasting and 2-hour plasma glucose levels were associated with higher Framingham risk score (fasting glucose: r(2) = 0.21; 2-hour glucose: r(2) = 0.24; P<0.001 for both), and insulin sensitivity with lower Framingham risk score (r(2) = 0.36; P<0.001). However, adjustment for insulin sensitivity and 2-hour glucose made the effect of fasting glucose non-significant (P = 0.060). Likewise, when adjusting for insulin sensitivity and fasting glucose, the association between 2-hour glucose and Framingham risk score disappeared (P = 0.143). In contrast, insulin sensitivity was still associated with Framingham risk score after adjusting for glucose levels (P<0.001). Body fat was not associated with Framingham risk score when taking insulin sensitivity into account (P = 0.550).'}]

yes

The study found that insulin resistance was associated with cardiovascular risk, and adjusting for insulin sensitivity made the effect of fasting glucose and 2-hour glucose non-significant, suggesting that insulin resistance drives the association between hyperglycemia and cardiovascular risk.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAre there risk factors that increase the rate of staple line leakage in patients undergoing primary sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently being performed with increasing frequency worldwide. It offers an excellent weight loss and resolution of comorbidities in the short term with a very low incidence of complications. However, the ever present risk of a staple line leak is still a major concern.\n-METHODS: Since 2005, data from obese patients that undergo bariatric procedures in Germany are prospectively registered in an online database and analyzed at the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgical Medicine. For the current analysis, all patients that had undergone primary sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity within a 7-year period were considered.\n-RESULTS: Using the GBSR, data from 5.400 LSGs were considered for analysis. Staple line leak rate decreased during the study period from 6.5 to 1.4 %. Male gender, higher BMI, concomitant sleep apnea, conversion to laparotomy, longer operation time, use of both buttresses and oversewing, and the occurrence of intraoperative complications were associated with a significantly higher leakage rate. On multivariate analysis, operation time and year of procedure only had a significant impact on staple line leak rate.'}]

yes

Male gender, higher BMI, concomitant sleep apnea, conversion to laparotomy, longer operation time, use of both buttresses and oversewing, and the occurrence of intraoperative complications are associated with a significantly higher leakage rate of staple line in patients undergoing primary sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nChronic functional somatic symptoms: a single syndrome?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Reliable longitudinal data of patients with functional somatic symptoms in general practice are lacking.\n-AIMS: To identify distinctive features in patients with chronic functional somatic symptoms, and to determine whether these symptoms support the hypothesis of the existence of specific somatic syndromes.\n-DESIGN OF STUDY: Observational study, with a comparison control group.\n-SETTING: Four primary care practices affiliated with the University of Nijmegen in the Netherlands.\n-METHOD: One hundred and eighty-two patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2002 as having chronic functional somatic symptoms and 182 controls matched by age, sex, socioeconomic status, and practice were included. Data on comorbidity, referrals, diagnostic tests, and hospital admissions over a period of 10 years prior to the diagnosis were collected. Medication use and number of visits to the general practitioner (GP) were extracted from the moment computerised registration was started.\n-RESULTS: In the 10 years before the diagnosis of chronic functional somatic symptoms, significantly more patients than controls presented functional somatic symptoms in at least two body systems, and used more somatic and psychotropic drugs. They visited the GP twice as much, statistically had significantly more psychiatric morbidity, and were referred more often to mental health workers and somatic specialists. The number of patients undergoing diagnostic tests was higher for patients with chronic functional somatic symptoms than for controls, but hospital admissions rates were equal.'}]

yes

The study found that patients with chronic functional somatic symptoms presented with significantly more functional somatic symptoms in at least two body systems, used more somatic and psychotropic drugs, and visited the GP twice as much compared to controls.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nActinobaculum schaalii, a cause of urinary tract infections in children?\n\nContext:\n-METHODS: Urine samples were examined by wet smear microscopy, incubated in 5% CO(2) for 1-2 days, and species-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for A. schaalii was performed.\n-RESULTS: In 5 of the 29 screened urines, A. schaalii was found only by real-time PCR in quantities equivalent to ≥ 10(4) -10(5) CFU/mL. In addition, A. schaalii was found in quantities equivalent to ≥ 10(6) CFU/mL by both culture and PCR in two children with a urinary tract infection and large numbers of leucocytes in the urine.'}]

yes

Actinobaculum schaalii was found in quantities equivalent to ≥ 10(4) -10(5) CFU/mL in 5 out of 29 screened urines and in quantities equivalent to ≥ 10(6) CFU/mL in two children with a urinary tract infection.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nPrevalence of chronic conditions among Medicare Part A beneficiaries in 2008 and 2010: are Medicare beneficiaries getting sicker?\n\nContext:\n-INTRODUCTION: Medicare beneficiaries who have chronic conditions are responsible for a disproportionate share of Medicare fee-for-service expenditures. The objective of this study was to analyze the change in the health of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Part A (hospital insurance) between 2008 and 2010 by comparing the prevalence of 11 chronic conditions.\n-METHODS: We conducted descriptive analyses using the 2008 and 2010 Chronic Conditions Public Use Files, which are newly available from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and have administrative (claims) data on 100% of the Medicare fee-for-service population. We examined the data by age, sex, and dual eligibility (eligibility for both Medicare and Medicaid).\n-RESULTS: Medicare Part A beneficiaries had more chronic conditions on average in 2010 than in 2008. The percentage increase in the average number of chronic conditions was larger for dual-eligible beneficiaries (2.8%) than for nondual-eligible beneficiaries (1.2%). The prevalence of some chronic conditions, such as congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke/transient ischemic attack, decreased. The deterioration of average health was due to other chronic conditions: chronic kidney disease, depression, diabetes, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis/osteoarthritis. Trends in Alzheimer\'s disease, cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease showed differences by sex or dual eligibility or both.'}]

yes

Medicare Part A beneficiaries had more chronic conditions on average in 2010 than in 2008, indicating that Medicare beneficiaries are getting sicker.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes successful completion of the Perinatal Education Programme result in improved obstetric practice?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To determine whether successful completion of the Perinatal Education Programme (PEP) improves obstetric practice.\n-METHOD: The three midwife obstetric units (MOUs) in a health district of Mpumalanga were included in the study. Two MOUs enrolled in the PEP and the third did not. A \'before-and-after\' study design was used to assess any changes in practice, and to monitor whether any changes occurred in the district during the time of the study; data were also collected at the third MOU. Data were collected by scoring of the obstetric files after the patient had delivered.\n-OUTCOME MEASURES: We ascertained whether the obstetric history, syphilis testing, blood group testing, haemoglobin measurement and uterine growth assessment were performed during antenatal care along with whether appropriate action was taken. For intrapartum care, estimation of fetal weight, the performance of pelvimetry, blood pressure monitoring, urine testing, evaluation of head above pelvis, fetal heart rate monitoring, monitoring of contractions and plotting of cervical dilatation, and whether the appropriate actions were taken, were assessed.\n-RESULTS: Eight of the 13 midwives at the two MOUs completed the PEP and all demonstrated an improvement in knowledge. Case notes of 303 patients from the various clinics were studied. There was no change in the referral patterns of any of the clinics during the study period. The obstetric history was well documented, but in no group was there a satisfactory response to a detected problem; appropriate action was taken in between 0% and 12% of cases. Syphilis testing was performed in 56-82% of cases, with no difference between the groups. The haemoglobin level was measured in only 4-15% of patients, with no difference before or after completion of the PEP. Where a problem in uterine growth was detected, an appropriate response occurred in 0-8% of patients and no difference before or after completion of the PEP was ascertained. In all groups, estimation of fetal weight and pelvimetry were seldom performed, the urine and fetal heart rate documentation were moderately well done and the blood pressure monitoring, assessment of head above pelvis, monitoring of contractions and plotting of cervical dilatation were usually performed. No differences before or after the PEP were detected. Where problems were detected, appropriate actions taken during labour improved, but not significantly.'}]

yes

The successful completion of the Perinatal Education Programme (PEP) results in improved obstetric practice, as all 8 midwives who completed the programme demonstrated an improvement in knowledge, and there was a slight improvement in appropriate actions taken during labour, but not significantly.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDo patients with localized prostate cancer treatment really want more aggressive treatment?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: Examine whether patients with prostate cancer choose the more aggressive of two radiotherapeutic options, whether this choice is reasoned, and what the determinants of the choice are.\n-PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty patients with primary prostate cancer (T(1-3)N(0)M(0)) were informed by means of a decision aid of two treatment options: radiotherapy with 70 Gy versus 74 Gy. The latter treatment is associated with more cure and more toxicity. The patients were asked whether they wanted to choose, and if so which treatment they preferred. They also assigned importance weights to the probability of various outcomes, such as survival, cure and adverse effects. Patients who wanted to choose their own treatment (n = 119) are described here.\n-RESULTS: The majority of these patients (75%) chose the lower radiation dose. Their choice was highly consistent (P<or = .001), with the importance weights assigned to the probability of survival, cure (odds ratio [OR] = 6.7 and 6.9) and late GI and genitourinary adverse effects (OR = 0.1 and 0.2). The lower dose was chosen more often by the older patients, low-risk patients, patients without hormone treatment, and patients with a low anxiety or depression score.'}]

no

The majority of patients with localized prostate cancer (75%) chose the lower radiation dose, which is less aggressive, indicating that they do not really want more aggressive treatment.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes music influence stress in mechanically ventilated patients?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVES: Mechanically ventilated patients experience profound stress. Interventions are needed to ameliorate stress that does not cause adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of music on stress in a sample of patients over the duration of ventilatory support.RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/\n-DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial; randomised patients (56.8+16.9 years, 61% male, APACHE III 57.2+18.3) receiving ventilatory support to: (1) patient-directed music (PDM) where patients self-initiated music listening whenever desired from a preferred collection, (2) headphones only to block ICU noise, or (3) usual ICU care. Twenty-four hour urinary cortisol samples were collected from a sub-set of subjects with intact renal function and not receiving medications known to influence cortisol levels (n=65).\n-SETTING: 12 ICUs in the Midwestern United States.\n-MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Urinary free cortisol (UFC), an integrative biomarker of stress.\n-RESULTS: Controlling for illness severity, gender, and baseline UFC (29-45 mg/day), mixed models analysis revealed no significant differences among groups in UFC over the course of ventilatory support.'}]

no

The study found no significant differences in urinary free cortisol levels among groups receiving patient-directed music, headphones only, or usual ICU care, indicating that music does not influence stress in mechanically ventilated patients.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes reducing spasticity translate into functional benefit?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Spasticity and loss of function in an affected arm are common after stroke. Although botulinum toxin is used to reduce spasticity, its functional benefits are less easily demonstrated. This paper reports an exploratory meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between reduced arm spasticity and improved arm function.\n-METHOD: Individual data from stroke patients in two randomised controlled trials of intra-muscular botulinum toxin were pooled. The Modified Ashworth Scale (elbow, wrist, fingers) was used to calculate a "Composite Spasticity Index". Data from the arm section of the Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index (dressing, grooming, and feeding) and three subjective measures (putting arm through sleeve, cleaning palm, cutting fingernails) were summed to give a "Composite Functional Index". Change scores and the time of maximum change were also calculated.\n-RESULTS: Maximum changes in both composite measures occurred concurrently in 47 patients. In 26 patients the improvement in spasticity preceded the improvement in function with 18 showing the reverse. There was a definite relationship between the maximum change in spasticity and the maximum change in arm function, independent of treatment (rho = -0.2822, p = 0.0008, n = 137). There was a clear relationship between the changes in spasticity and in arm function in patients treated with botulinum toxin (Dysport) at 500 or 1000 units (rho = -0.5679, p = 0.0090, n = 22; rho = -0.4430, p = 0.0018, n = 47), but not in those treated with placebo or 1500 units.'}]

yes

There was a definite relationship between the maximum change in spasticity and the maximum change in arm function, independent of treatment.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nIs the holmium:YAG laser the best intracorporeal lithotripter for the ureter?\n\nContext:\n-PURPOSE: To study the efficiency and safety of holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones.\n-PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 188 patients with 208 ureteral stones were treated with semirigid ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy from January 2003 to December 2005. Of the stones, 116 were lower ureteral, 37 middle ureteral, and 55 upper ureteral.\n-RESULTS: The success rate was 92.7% at the time of ureteroscopy and 96.7% at 3 months. The failures were secondary to retropulsion of the stones (3.3%). There were no perforations and one stricture. Stenting was done in 90% of patients.'}]

yes

The holmium:YAG laser has a high success rate of 92.7% at the time of ureteroscopy and 96.7% at 3 months for treating ureteral stones, with a low complication rate, making it a suitable option for intracorporeal lithotripsy.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nMetered-dose inhalers. Do health care providers know what to teach?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: The specific aim of this investigation was to evaluate the proficiency of health care providers and patients in the proper use of metered-dose inhalers.\n-DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Health care providers, which include house staff, nurses, and respiratory care practitioners who provide care to patients with asthma in the primary general medicine clinic or the pulmonary medicine clinic of a university-county hospital in which patients were referred, were surveyed and assigned a performance score regarding the knowledge base of the appropriate use of metered-dose inhalers. Patients who attended the primary care general medicine and pulmonary subspecialty clinic were also assessed as to their proficiency in the use of metered-dose inhalers.\n-RESULTS: A significant percentage of patients had a poor understanding of the technique used with the metered-dose inhaler. House staff and nursing staff were also less proficient in the proper use of the metered-dose inhaler. The respiratory care practitioners were the most knowledgeable of the health care providers.'}]

no

A significant percentage of patients had a poor understanding of the technique used with the metered-dose inhaler, and even some health care providers, such as house staff and nursing staff, were less proficient in the proper use of the metered-dose inhaler.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes the bracket-ligature combination affect the amount of orthodontic space closure over three months?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of bracket-ligature combination on the amount of orthodontic space closure over three months.\n-DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial with three parallel groups.\n-SETTING: A hospital orthodontic department (Chesterfield Royal Hospital, UK).\n-PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five patients requiring upper first premolar extractions.\n-METHODS: Informed consent was obtained and participants were randomly allocated into one of three groups: (1) conventional pre-adjusted edgewise brackets and elastomeric ligatures; (2) conventional pre-adjusted edgewise brackets and Super Slick(®) low friction elastomeric ligatures; (3) Damon 3MX(®) passive self-ligating brackets. Space closure was undertaken on 0·019×0·025-inch stainless steel archwires with nickel-titanium coil springs. Participants were recalled at four weekly intervals. Upper alginate impressions were taken at each visit (maximum three). The primary outcome measure was the mean amount of space closure in a 3-month period.\n-RESULTS: A one-way ANOVA was undertaken [dependent variable: mean space closure (mm); independent variable: group allocation]. The amount of space closure was very similar between the three groups (1 mm per 28 days); however, there was a wide variation in the rate of space closure between individuals. The differences in the amount of space closure over three months between the three groups was very small and non-significant (P\u200a=\u200a0·718).'}]

no

The bracket-ligature combination does not significantly affect the amount of orthodontic space closure over three months, as the differences in the amount of space closure between the three groups were very small and non-significant.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nHealth habits and vaccination status of Lebanese residents: are future doctors applying the rules of prevention?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: There has never been a nationally representative survey of medical students\' personal health-related practices, although they are inherently of interest and may affect patient-counseling practices. This study evaluated the health practices and the vaccination status of first year residents working at the academic hospital Hôtel-Dieu de France.\n-METHODS: The medical files of all medicine and surgery residents in their first year of specialization between the years 2005 and 2008 were reviewed. These residents were required to go through a preventive medical visit at the University Center of Family and Community Health.\n-RESULTS: One hundred and nine residents (109) were included in the study; 68 (6239%) were male and 41 (37.61%) were female with a mean age of 26 years. Only 6 residents (5.50%) practiced physical activity according to international guidelines (more than three times a week for more than 30 minutes each time). Most residents (n = 76 ; 69.73%) used to skip one or two meals especially breakfast and as a consequence 30 male (44.11%) and 4 female (9.75%) students were overweight, with a statistical difference between the two sexes (Fisher test, p-value = 0.001). Twenty-eight residents (25.69%) were smokers with a male predominance. Fourteen residents of both genders (12.84%) drank alcohol regularly (>3 times a week) and 71 (65.14%) had a drink occasionally (once a month or less). Only 25 residents (23%) of the cohort had a complete and up-to-date immunization status. The immunization gap was basically against measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis (dT Polio). Ninety-nine residents (90.83%) had full immunization against hepatitis B with an adequate response in 78 residents (71.56%).'}]

no

The study found that only 23% of the residents had a complete and up-to-date immunization status, with a gap mainly against measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis (dT Polio).

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nDoes vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia have the same evolution as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia is a little known disease which could be related to risk factors different from simple HPV infections.\n-OBJECTIVE: To ascertain wheter vaginal lesions have a natural history similar to cervical lesions.MATERIALS &\n-METHODS: A retrospective study to identify patients with vaginal lesions and synchronous cervical lesions through biopsy. The rate of mild cervical lesions (koilocytosis, warts, CIN I with and without koilocytosis) was compared with the rate of severe cervical lesions (CIN II and III, cervical carcinoma) in patients with mild vaginal lesions (warts and koilocytosis, and low-grade VAIN) and in patients with severe vaginal lesions (high-grade VAIN). Using koilocytosis as a marker, the rate of "active" cervical lesions was compared with the rate of "non active" cervical lesions in patients with "active" versus "non active" vaginal lesions. Finally, the rates of mild and severe cervical lesions were compared among each group of VAIN (low-grade, high-grade, with or without koilocytosis).\n-RESULTS: In patients with mild vaginal lesions, mild cervical lesions were significantly more frequent than severe cervical lesions. In patients with "active" vaginal lesions the rate of "active" cervical lesions was significantly higher than "non active" cervical lesions. The differences in rates of mild cervical lesions and severe cervical lesions among patients with high-grade VAIN and low-grade VAIN (with and without koilocytosis) were not significant.'}]

yes

The study found that in patients with mild vaginal lesions, mild cervical lesions were significantly more frequent than severe cervical lesions, and in patients with 'active' vaginal lesions, the rate of 'active' cervical lesions was significantly higher than 'non active' cervical lesions.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nShould general practitioners call patients by their first names?\n\nContext:\n-OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability to patients of the use of patients\' first names by doctors and doctors\' first names by patients in general practice.\n-DESIGN: An administered questionnaire survey.\n-SETTING: 5 General practices in Lothian.\n-PATIENTS: 475 Patients consulting 30 general practitioners.\n-MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Response by patients to questionnaire on attitude to use of first names.\n-RESULTS: Most of the patients either liked (223) or did not mind (175) being called by their first names. Only 77 disliked it, most of whom were aged over 65. Most patients (324) did not, however, want to call the doctor by his or her first name.'}]

yes

Most patients either liked or did not mind being called by their first names, with only 77 patients disliking it.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nTransesophageal echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function in brain-dead patients: are marginally acceptable hearts suitable for transplantation?\n\nContext:\n-BACKGROUND: The brain-dead donor supply has become one of the criteria limiting the performance of heart transplantation. Conventional screening criteria are too limiting and exclude suitable heart donors. Echocardiography is now widely available and is a reliable tool to assess left ventricular dysfunction in brain-dead donors. Yet few data are available on the degree of left ventricular dysfunction where a transplantation is possible.\n-METHODS: Fifty-five potential brain-dead heart donors (age 38 +/- 11 years) were prospectively evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before harvesting. Fractional area change (FAC) was used to assess left ventricular function in potential brain-dead donors. Transplanted hearts were evaluated on the fifth postoperative day. The transplantation was considered a success if the recipient was alive, not retransplanted, without an assistance device or an epinephrine infusion of more than 1 mg/h and showed an ejection fraction above 40%.\n-RESULTS: Of the 55 potential heart donors, 20 exhibited an FAC of less than 50%. Forty hearts were harvested, 36 of which were successfully transplanted. Nine patients had an FAC below 50% (group H2) and 27 had an FAC over 50% (group H1). Four patients died: 2 from hemorrhage (FAC>50% in donors); 1 from right and one from left ventricular dysfunction (FAC<50% in donors). The FAC increased significantly from 51 +/- 15% to 57 +/- 11% in 18 hearts that underwent TEE in donors and afterwards in recipients. Overall actuarial survival was 86.2% versus 64.6% at 1 and 2 years in group H1 and group H2, respectively (p = NS).'}]

yes

The study found that marginally acceptable hearts with an fractional area change (FAC) of less than 50% can be suitable for transplantation, as 9 patients with an FAC below 50% had successful transplants and showed an ejection fraction above 40%.

[{'role': 'system', 'content': 'You will answer the given Question based on given Context. The context is the abstract of medical paper'}, {'role': 'user', 'content': 'Given Question and Context as the INPUT, please answer the question following the Instruction\n\n# Instruction:\n1. Please read and understand carefully each point in the Context. This will be your only knowledge when answering question.\n2. Read the Question and answer it ONLY using the information in Context\n3. Deliver two types of answers from given Question, Long-Answer and Short-Answer. Long-Answer contains straight forward answer, then based on the Long-Answer, give Short-answer that contains "yes", "maybe", or "no".\n\n# Important Note\nReturn the answers in following JSON format\n{\n "Long-Answer": <Generated Long-Answer>,\n "Short-Answer": <Generated Short-Answer>\n}\n\nDo not add additional explanation beside the JSON output!\n\nINPUT:\nQuestion:\nAttenuation of ischemia/reperfusion-induced ovarian damage in rats: does edaravone offer protection?\n\nContext:\n-METHODS: Twenty-eight female Sprague Dawley rats were allocated randomly to 4 groups. The sham group (group 1) was only subjected to catheter insertion, not to pneumoperitoneum. Group 2 received a 1 mg/kg dose of 0.9% sodium chloride by the intraperitoneal route for 10 min before pneumoperitoneum. Groups 3 and 4 received 6 and 12 mg/kg edaravone, respectively, by the intraperitoneal route for 10 min before pneumoperitoneum. After 60 min of pneumoperitoneum, the gas was deflated. Immediately after the reperfusion period, both ovaries were excised for histological scoring, caspase-3 immunohistochemistry and biochemical evaluation including glutathione (GSH) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. Also, total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was measured in plasma samples to evaluate the antioxidant effect of edaravone.\n-RESULTS: Ovarian sections in the saline group revealed higher scores for follicular degeneration and edema (p<0.0001) when compared with the sham group. Administration of different doses of edaravone in rats significantly prevented degenerative changes in the ovary (p<0.0001). Caspase-3 expression was only detected in the ovarian surface epithelium in all groups, and there was a significant difference between the treatment groups and the saline group (p<0.0001). Treatment of rats with edaravone reduced caspase-3 expression in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, biochemical measurements of oxidative stress markers (MDA, GSH and TAC) revealed that prophylactic edaravone treatment attenuated oxidative stress induced by I/R injury.'}]

yes

Administration of different doses of edaravone in rats significantly prevented degenerative changes in the ovary and reduced caspase-3 expression in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that edaravone offers protection against ischemia/reperfusion-induced ovarian damage in rats.