input
stringlengths 536
7.99k
| output
stringlengths 1
1.82k
|
|---|---|
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: The Oscars ceremony at the 87th Academy Awards took place in Hollywood's 3,300-seat Dolby Theatre in California on Sunday evening(Feb.23, 2015). The night concluded with the biggest award of the evening, Best Picture. After already securing the Best Screenplay and Best Director Award for Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, Birdman took flight as the winner of the night.
Competing with 7 other contenders including another much-predicted winner "Boyhood", the top prize of the night was finally awarded to the film "Birdman". The director of "Birdman" was also awarded the Best Director Oscar by the Academy. In addition, the film took home two other awards for Best Original Screenplay and Cinematography.
Starring Michael Keaton, the dark comedy "Birdman" tells the story of a faded Hollywood star, famous for his roles as the "Birdman superhero", who struggles to win the support and confidence to perform in a different character type in a Broadway show.
The Academy's Best Leading Actor award went to Eddie Redmayne, for his performance in the film "the Theory of Everything". It was the actor's first nomination and first win.
Meanwhile, the Best Leading Actress award went to Julianne Moore who plays a college professor who learns that she is suffering from early-onset Alzheimer's disease.
Patricia Arquette also won her first Oscar for her supporting actress role in the movie "Boyhood", while J.K. Simmons won the Best Supporting Actor in "Whiplash".
Best foreign Language film went to "Ida", while "Crisis Hotline" won the award for Best Documentary Short Subject.
Question: Who does Birdman star?
Answer:Michael Keaton
Question: What type of show does he need the confidence to perform in?
Answer:A Broadway show.
Question: Is it a light and fluffy comedy?
Answer:No.
Question: Is it about a current Hollywood star?
Answer:No.
Question: Who won the Best Leading Actor award?
Answer:Eddie Redmayne.
Question: For what film?
Answer:The Theory of Everything
Question: Was he ever nominated for anything before?
Answer:No
Question: Who pretends to be a college professor in another movie?
Answer:Julianne Moore
Question: Did she win anything for her role?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What award does she earn?
Answer:Best Leading Actress
Question: What does she suffer from in her movie?
Answer:Early-onset Alzheimer's disease.
Question: Where did the Oscars ceremony take place?
Answer:They took place in Hollywood's 3,300-seat Dolby Theatre in California.
Question: On which day?
Answer:Feb.23, 2015
Question: Was it early in the day or later?
Answer:It was later.
Question: What was the biggest award of the evening?
Answer:Best Picture.
Question: How many contenders were there for it?
Answer:Eight
Question: Which film was predicted to win?
Answer: | Boyhood |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: The Oscars ceremony at the 87th Academy Awards took place in Hollywood's 3,300-seat Dolby Theatre in California on Sunday evening(Feb.23, 2015). The night concluded with the biggest award of the evening, Best Picture. After already securing the Best Screenplay and Best Director Award for Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, Birdman took flight as the winner of the night.
Competing with 7 other contenders including another much-predicted winner "Boyhood", the top prize of the night was finally awarded to the film "Birdman". The director of "Birdman" was also awarded the Best Director Oscar by the Academy. In addition, the film took home two other awards for Best Original Screenplay and Cinematography.
Starring Michael Keaton, the dark comedy "Birdman" tells the story of a faded Hollywood star, famous for his roles as the "Birdman superhero", who struggles to win the support and confidence to perform in a different character type in a Broadway show.
The Academy's Best Leading Actor award went to Eddie Redmayne, for his performance in the film "the Theory of Everything". It was the actor's first nomination and first win.
Meanwhile, the Best Leading Actress award went to Julianne Moore who plays a college professor who learns that she is suffering from early-onset Alzheimer's disease.
Patricia Arquette also won her first Oscar for her supporting actress role in the movie "Boyhood", while J.K. Simmons won the Best Supporting Actor in "Whiplash".
Best foreign Language film went to "Ida", while "Crisis Hotline" won the award for Best Documentary Short Subject.
Question: Who does Birdman star?
Answer:Michael Keaton
Question: What type of show does he need the confidence to perform in?
Answer:A Broadway show.
Question: Is it a light and fluffy comedy?
Answer:No.
Question: Is it about a current Hollywood star?
Answer:No.
Question: Who won the Best Leading Actor award?
Answer:Eddie Redmayne.
Question: For what film?
Answer:The Theory of Everything
Question: Was he ever nominated for anything before?
Answer:No
Question: Who pretends to be a college professor in another movie?
Answer:Julianne Moore
Question: Did she win anything for her role?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What award does she earn?
Answer:Best Leading Actress
Question: What does she suffer from in her movie?
Answer:Early-onset Alzheimer's disease.
Question: Where did the Oscars ceremony take place?
Answer:They took place in Hollywood's 3,300-seat Dolby Theatre in California.
Question: On which day?
Answer:Feb.23, 2015
Question: Was it early in the day or later?
Answer:It was later.
Question: What was the biggest award of the evening?
Answer:Best Picture.
Question: How many contenders were there for it?
Answer:Eight
Question: Which film was predicted to win?
Answer:Boyhood
Question: What film did J.K. Simmons win an award for?
Answer: | He won Best Supporting Actor. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: The Oscars ceremony at the 87th Academy Awards took place in Hollywood's 3,300-seat Dolby Theatre in California on Sunday evening(Feb.23, 2015). The night concluded with the biggest award of the evening, Best Picture. After already securing the Best Screenplay and Best Director Award for Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, Birdman took flight as the winner of the night.
Competing with 7 other contenders including another much-predicted winner "Boyhood", the top prize of the night was finally awarded to the film "Birdman". The director of "Birdman" was also awarded the Best Director Oscar by the Academy. In addition, the film took home two other awards for Best Original Screenplay and Cinematography.
Starring Michael Keaton, the dark comedy "Birdman" tells the story of a faded Hollywood star, famous for his roles as the "Birdman superhero", who struggles to win the support and confidence to perform in a different character type in a Broadway show.
The Academy's Best Leading Actor award went to Eddie Redmayne, for his performance in the film "the Theory of Everything". It was the actor's first nomination and first win.
Meanwhile, the Best Leading Actress award went to Julianne Moore who plays a college professor who learns that she is suffering from early-onset Alzheimer's disease.
Patricia Arquette also won her first Oscar for her supporting actress role in the movie "Boyhood", while J.K. Simmons won the Best Supporting Actor in "Whiplash".
Best foreign Language film went to "Ida", while "Crisis Hotline" won the award for Best Documentary Short Subject.
Question: Who does Birdman star?
Answer:Michael Keaton
Question: What type of show does he need the confidence to perform in?
Answer:A Broadway show.
Question: Is it a light and fluffy comedy?
Answer:No.
Question: Is it about a current Hollywood star?
Answer:No.
Question: Who won the Best Leading Actor award?
Answer:Eddie Redmayne.
Question: For what film?
Answer:The Theory of Everything
Question: Was he ever nominated for anything before?
Answer:No
Question: Who pretends to be a college professor in another movie?
Answer:Julianne Moore
Question: Did she win anything for her role?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What award does she earn?
Answer:Best Leading Actress
Question: What does she suffer from in her movie?
Answer:Early-onset Alzheimer's disease.
Question: Where did the Oscars ceremony take place?
Answer:They took place in Hollywood's 3,300-seat Dolby Theatre in California.
Question: On which day?
Answer:Feb.23, 2015
Question: Was it early in the day or later?
Answer:It was later.
Question: What was the biggest award of the evening?
Answer:Best Picture.
Question: How many contenders were there for it?
Answer:Eight
Question: Which film was predicted to win?
Answer:Boyhood
Question: What film did J.K. Simmons win an award for?
Answer:He won Best Supporting Actor.
Question: What was the award?
Answer: | Best Supporting Actor |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer: | 1948 to 1990 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer: | Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer: | Czech Republic and Slovakia. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer: | 1 January 1993. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer: | Austro-Hungarian Empire |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer: | Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer: | Central Europe |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer:Central Europe
Question: When was it originated?
Answer: | October 1918 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer:Central Europe
Question: When was it originated?
Answer:October 1918
Question: True or false, their government was once in exile
Answer: | True |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer:Central Europe
Question: When was it originated?
Answer:October 1918
Question: True or false, their government was once in exile
Answer:True
Question: What kind of economy did they have from 48-90
Answer: | a command economy. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer:Central Europe
Question: When was it originated?
Answer:October 1918
Question: True or false, their government was once in exile
Answer:True
Question: What kind of economy did they have from 48-90
Answer:a command economy.
Question: What was the Prague Spring?
Answer: | A period of political liberalization |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer:Central Europe
Question: When was it originated?
Answer:October 1918
Question: True or false, their government was once in exile
Answer:True
Question: What kind of economy did they have from 48-90
Answer:a command economy.
Question: What was the Prague Spring?
Answer:A period of political liberalization
Question: When did this occur?
Answer: | 1968 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer:Central Europe
Question: When was it originated?
Answer:October 1918
Question: True or false, their government was once in exile
Answer:True
Question: What kind of economy did they have from 48-90
Answer:a command economy.
Question: What was the Prague Spring?
Answer:A period of political liberalization
Question: When did this occur?
Answer:1968
Question: What type of terrain do they have?
Answer: | irregular |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer:Central Europe
Question: When was it originated?
Answer:October 1918
Question: True or false, their government was once in exile
Answer:True
Question: What kind of economy did they have from 48-90
Answer:a command economy.
Question: What was the Prague Spring?
Answer:A period of political liberalization
Question: When did this occur?
Answer:1968
Question: What type of terrain do they have?
Answer:irregular
Question: Did they have mountains?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer:Central Europe
Question: When was it originated?
Answer:October 1918
Question: True or false, their government was once in exile
Answer:True
Question: What kind of economy did they have from 48-90
Answer:a command economy.
Question: What was the Prague Spring?
Answer:A period of political liberalization
Question: When did this occur?
Answer:1968
Question: What type of terrain do they have?
Answer:irregular
Question: Did they have mountains?
Answer:yes
Question: What body of water is present?
Answer: | River basin |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia (; Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko") was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993.
From 1939 to 1945, following its forced division and partial incorporation into Nazi Germany, the state did not "de facto" exist but its government-in-exile continued to operate.
From 1948 to 1990, Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet bloc with a command economy. Its economic status was formalized in membership of Comecon from 1949, and its defense status in the Warsaw Pact of May 1955. A period of political liberalization in 1968, known as the Prague Spring, was forcibly ended when the Soviet Union, assisted by several other Warsaw Pact countries, invaded. In 1989, as Marxist–Leninist governments and communism were ending all over Europe, Czechoslovaks peacefully deposed their government in the Velvet Revolution; state price controls were removed after a period of preparation. In 1993, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The country was of generally irregular terrain. The western area was part of the north-central European uplands. The eastern region was composed of the northern reaches of the Carpathian Mountains and lands of the Danube River basin.
Question: Was Czechoslovakia ever apart of the Soviet bloc?
Answer:yes
Question: when were they a part of it?
Answer:1948 to 1990
Question: What happened in 1993?
Answer:Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states
Question: What were the two states?
Answer:Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Question: When did it gain independence?
Answer:1 January 1993.
Question: Who it did gain independence from?
Answer:Austro-Hungarian Empire
Question: Do they have an alternate name?
Answer:Czech and , "Česko-Slovensko
Question: Were they a sovereign state?
Answer:yes
Question: Where in Europe is it located?
Answer:Central Europe
Question: When was it originated?
Answer:October 1918
Question: True or false, their government was once in exile
Answer:True
Question: What kind of economy did they have from 48-90
Answer:a command economy.
Question: What was the Prague Spring?
Answer:A period of political liberalization
Question: When did this occur?
Answer:1968
Question: What type of terrain do they have?
Answer:irregular
Question: Did they have mountains?
Answer:yes
Question: What body of water is present?
Answer:River basin
Question: What river speicifcally?
Answer: | Danube |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer: | Loyola University |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer: | its humor. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer: | Thomas Hobbes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer: | a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer: | Mordechai Gordon |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer: | every four years |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer: | "The Daily Show" |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer:"The Daily Show"
Question: Who jokes about a song?
Answer: | Hari Kondabolu |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer:"The Daily Show"
Question: Who jokes about a song?
Answer:Hari Kondabolu
Question: What is it's name
Answer: | "Don't Cha" |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer:"The Daily Show"
Question: Who jokes about a song?
Answer:Hari Kondabolu
Question: What is it's name
Answer:"Don't Cha"
Question: By whom?
Answer: | "The Pussycat Dolls", |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer:"The Daily Show"
Question: Who jokes about a song?
Answer:Hari Kondabolu
Question: What is it's name
Answer:"Don't Cha"
Question: By whom?
Answer:"The Pussycat Dolls",
Question: Is humor only used to help?
Answer: | No |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer:"The Daily Show"
Question: Who jokes about a song?
Answer:Hari Kondabolu
Question: What is it's name
Answer:"Don't Cha"
Question: By whom?
Answer:"The Pussycat Dolls",
Question: Is humor only used to help?
Answer:No
Question: What is something less than positive that may appear there?
Answer: | representation of women |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer:"The Daily Show"
Question: Who jokes about a song?
Answer:Hari Kondabolu
Question: What is it's name
Answer:"Don't Cha"
Question: By whom?
Answer:"The Pussycat Dolls",
Question: Is humor only used to help?
Answer:No
Question: What is something less than positive that may appear there?
Answer:representation of women
Question: What might it be linked to?
Answer: | vulgarity and racism |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer:"The Daily Show"
Question: Who jokes about a song?
Answer:Hari Kondabolu
Question: What is it's name
Answer:"Don't Cha"
Question: By whom?
Answer:"The Pussycat Dolls",
Question: Is humor only used to help?
Answer:No
Question: What is something less than positive that may appear there?
Answer:representation of women
Question: What might it be linked to?
Answer:vulgarity and racism
Question: What does the author see in his reflection?
Answer: | increased wrinkles |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer:"The Daily Show"
Question: Who jokes about a song?
Answer:Hari Kondabolu
Question: What is it's name
Answer:"Don't Cha"
Question: By whom?
Answer:"The Pussycat Dolls",
Question: Is humor only used to help?
Answer:No
Question: What is something less than positive that may appear there?
Answer:representation of women
Question: What might it be linked to?
Answer:vulgarity and racism
Question: What does the author see in his reflection?
Answer:increased wrinkles
Question: What do they tell him?
Answer: | That there is a comedy in everything. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A culture's values can be mirrored by its humor. Humor has been evaluated by many great minds such as Thomas Hobbes, who, in "On Nature", disliked humor, "Laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden thought of feeling far better than others." He thought humor to be a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness.
However, Mordechai Gordon, Ph. D of Education, insists, "Humor allows us to view the world from an angle that is amusing rather than serious." I agree with Gordon. Learning to look at the world through humor is important.
In the United States, every four years an election occurs. Without humor as a way to express their feelings, how else would Americans keep from clawing their eyes out and going the way of lemming? Television shows like "The Daily Show" have become important parts of American culture. They are mothering the masses by metaphorically airplane-ing politics into our mouths. They make politics fun.
Of course, politics is only one type of humor. Social humor helps people through the twists and turns of the human condition. American pop culture promotes an unhealthy self- image. On the topic of self-image, Hari Kondabolu stands out. He has a joke about the popular musical group "The Pussycat Dolls", describing their hit song "Don't Cha" as a negative representation of women. He points out an obvious offence in American culture.
A study from Loyola University of Maryland has shown that humor is one determining factor for selecting a mating partner. Amongst other things, mates look for an outstanding funny bone in a potential partner.
Of course, humor is not always used for good purposes. Humor can be linked to vulgarity and racism, but, like everything else, it has potential to unite human beings by allowing us to laugh at ourselves, our failures and our connection with one another.
Though 1ife may seem tough and depressing at times, all I have to do is look in the mirror at my increased wrinkles to know that there is a comedy out there that even Chaplin wasn't aware of.
With that in mind, remember to laugh with humanity and sometimes at humanity.
Question: Is humor important in the opinion of the author?
Answer:yes
Question: Where was the study done showing we look for humor when dating?
Answer:Loyola University
Question: What is mirrored by a culture?
Answer:its humor.
Question: Who didn't like humor?
Answer:Thomas Hobbes
Question: What did he think it was?
Answer:a negative quality of human narrow-mindedness
Question: Who said it helps us see things less seriously?
Answer:Mordechai Gordon
Question: When do we elected politicians in America?
Answer:every four years
Question: Is laughter important in this process?
Answer:Yes
Question: What television show provides an outlet for this?
Answer:"The Daily Show"
Question: Who jokes about a song?
Answer:Hari Kondabolu
Question: What is it's name
Answer:"Don't Cha"
Question: By whom?
Answer:"The Pussycat Dolls",
Question: Is humor only used to help?
Answer:No
Question: What is something less than positive that may appear there?
Answer:representation of women
Question: What might it be linked to?
Answer:vulgarity and racism
Question: What does the author see in his reflection?
Answer:increased wrinkles
Question: What do they tell him?
Answer:That there is a comedy in everything.
Question: And what should we chuckle at besides ourselves?
Answer: | our failures and connection with one another. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer: | tree trimmer |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer: | he accidentally struck a child |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer: | yes, able to breathe on his own |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer: | 10 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer: | accidental |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer: | Michigan |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer: | earlier this month |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer: | his vehicle |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer: | dozen people |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer: | his truck struck a 10-year-old boy |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer: | unknown |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer:unknown
Question: What did they beat him up with?
Answer: | "fists and feet," |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer:unknown
Question: What did they beat him up with?
Answer:"fists and feet,"
Question: How bad was he hurt?
Answer: | "This is a long road ahead |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer:unknown
Question: What did they beat him up with?
Answer:"fists and feet,"
Question: How bad was he hurt?
Answer:"This is a long road ahead
Question: Where did he go afterwards?
Answer: | unknown |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer:unknown
Question: What did they beat him up with?
Answer:"fists and feet,"
Question: How bad was he hurt?
Answer:"This is a long road ahead
Question: Where did he go afterwards?
Answer:unknown
Question: What was his condition?
Answer: | he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer:unknown
Question: What did they beat him up with?
Answer:"fists and feet,"
Question: How bad was he hurt?
Answer:"This is a long road ahead
Question: Where did he go afterwards?
Answer:unknown
Question: What was his condition?
Answer:he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions
Question: Who found them?
Answer: | unknown |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer:unknown
Question: What did they beat him up with?
Answer:"fists and feet,"
Question: How bad was he hurt?
Answer:"This is a long road ahead
Question: Where did he go afterwards?
Answer:unknown
Question: What was his condition?
Answer:he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions
Question: Who found them?
Answer:unknown
Question: Who intervened?
Answer: | Mandi Marie Utash |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer:unknown
Question: What did they beat him up with?
Answer:"fists and feet,"
Question: How bad was he hurt?
Answer:"This is a long road ahead
Question: Where did he go afterwards?
Answer:unknown
Question: What was his condition?
Answer:he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions
Question: Who found them?
Answer:unknown
Question: Who intervened?
Answer:Mandi Marie Utash
Question: Did he have any siblings?
Answer: | unknown |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer:unknown
Question: What did they beat him up with?
Answer:"fists and feet,"
Question: How bad was he hurt?
Answer:"This is a long road ahead
Question: Where did he go afterwards?
Answer:unknown
Question: What was his condition?
Answer:he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions
Question: Who found them?
Answer:unknown
Question: Who intervened?
Answer:Mandi Marie Utash
Question: Did he have any siblings?
Answer:unknown
Question: relatives?
Answer: | Mandi Marie Utash, his daughter, |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- The 54-year-old Michigan tree trimmer severely beaten after he accidentally struck a child who had stepped into the street earlier this month is breathing on his own, according to his daughter.
"He is off the ventilator and is able to breathe on his own," Mandi Marie Utash posted Friday to a GoFundMe.com page she and her brother set up for their father, who they say does not have health insurance.
Steven Utash was set upon by about a dozen people after his truck struck a 10-year-old boy, police said. After Utash stopped his vehicle to help the boy, he was "severely beaten" with "fists and feet," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.
Authorities credited a woman who stepped in as Utash was being attacked with saving his life.
Mandi Marie Utash wrote that her father doesn't seem to know what happened to him or why he was in the hospital, but that he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions. "These are baby steps," she says.
She wrote that her father "keeps flashing back to the assault screaming for "HELP" and "PLEASE GET THEM OFF ME."
"This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it."
Steven Utash had previously been in a medically induced coma.
Jennifer Moreno, a police spokeswoman, told CNN that all of the alleged assailants were African-American and that none are known to be related to the boy or his family. She said the beating was "a spontaneous response." Utash is white.
Question: Who was beaten?
Answer:tree trimmer
Question: Why?
Answer:he accidentally struck a child
Question: Did the kid live?
Answer:yes, able to breathe on his own
Question: How old was the kid?
Answer:10
Question: Why did he hit the kid?
Answer:accidental
Question: Where?
Answer:Michigan
Question: When?
Answer:earlier this month
Question: What was he driving?
Answer:his vehicle
Question: Who beat him up?
Answer:dozen people
Question: Why?
Answer:his truck struck a 10-year-old boy
Question: Were they the relatives of the kid?
Answer:unknown
Question: What did they beat him up with?
Answer:"fists and feet,"
Question: How bad was he hurt?
Answer:"This is a long road ahead
Question: Where did he go afterwards?
Answer:unknown
Question: What was his condition?
Answer:he is able to wiggle his toes on command and answer yes or no questions
Question: Who found them?
Answer:unknown
Question: Who intervened?
Answer:Mandi Marie Utash
Question: Did he have any siblings?
Answer:unknown
Question: relatives?
Answer:Mandi Marie Utash, his daughter,
Question: What did she communicate about it?
Answer: | "This is a long road ahead," she said. "But the end of the road will be worth it." |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer: | Donny Love |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer: | No |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer: | San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer: | May 4, 2008 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer: | Rachelle Lynette Carlock |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer: | obtain reward money and a break on his state charges |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer: | between 30 years and life |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer: | Fred Sheppard |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer: | Assistant U.S. Attorney |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer: | Ella Louise Sanders |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer:Ella Louise Sanders
Question: What did Love tell them to buy and steal?
Answer: | explosive powder and bomb-making materials |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer:Ella Louise Sanders
Question: What did Love tell them to buy and steal?
Answer:explosive powder and bomb-making materials
Question: What city was Love's house in?
Answer: | unknown |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer:Ella Louise Sanders
Question: What did Love tell them to buy and steal?
Answer:explosive powder and bomb-making materials
Question: What city was Love's house in?
Answer:unknown
Question: Was Love rich?
Answer: | No |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer:Ella Louise Sanders
Question: What did Love tell them to buy and steal?
Answer:explosive powder and bomb-making materials
Question: What city was Love's house in?
Answer:unknown
Question: Was Love rich?
Answer:No
Question: Who set off the bombs at the courthouse?
Answer: | Carlock |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer:Ella Louise Sanders
Question: What did Love tell them to buy and steal?
Answer:explosive powder and bomb-making materials
Question: What city was Love's house in?
Answer:unknown
Question: Was Love rich?
Answer:No
Question: Who set off the bombs at the courthouse?
Answer:Carlock
Question: How long was the trial?
Answer: | two-weeks |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer:Ella Louise Sanders
Question: What did Love tell them to buy and steal?
Answer:explosive powder and bomb-making materials
Question: What city was Love's house in?
Answer:unknown
Question: Was Love rich?
Answer:No
Question: Who set off the bombs at the courthouse?
Answer:Carlock
Question: How long was the trial?
Answer:two-weeks
Question: Where did Carlock, Robinson and Love drive to with a backpack?
Answer: | San Diego |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer:Ella Louise Sanders
Question: What did Love tell them to buy and steal?
Answer:explosive powder and bomb-making materials
Question: What city was Love's house in?
Answer:unknown
Question: Was Love rich?
Answer:No
Question: Who set off the bombs at the courthouse?
Answer:Carlock
Question: How long was the trial?
Answer:two-weeks
Question: Where did Carlock, Robinson and Love drive to with a backpack?
Answer:San Diego
Question: How many pipe bombs did they have?
Answer: | three |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer:Ella Louise Sanders
Question: What did Love tell them to buy and steal?
Answer:explosive powder and bomb-making materials
Question: What city was Love's house in?
Answer:unknown
Question: Was Love rich?
Answer:No
Question: Who set off the bombs at the courthouse?
Answer:Carlock
Question: How long was the trial?
Answer:two-weeks
Question: Where did Carlock, Robinson and Love drive to with a backpack?
Answer:San Diego
Question: How many pipe bombs did they have?
Answer:three
Question: Did they drive to the San Diego in an SUV?
Answer: | unknown |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A federal jury convicted a California man Monday in a case in which prosecutors say he convinced a woman to bomb a federal courthouse so he could turn her and others involved the scheme in to authorities, and collect reward money.
Donny Love was found guilty on 10 charges, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction, for the role he played in the May 4, 2008, attack on San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse.
No one was injured in the blast that damaged the building's front lobby, shattered a glass door and broke a window in a building across the street.
Love could face between 30 years and life in prison, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Sheppard.
During the two-week trial, prosecutors painted Love as the mastermind behind the blast.
He directed two others, Rachelle Lynette Carlock and Ella Louise Sanders to purchase explosive powder and to steal bomb-making materials, they said. Carlock was an on-again, off-again girlfriend to Love, said Sheppard.
According to testimony, Carlock and Eric Reginald Robinson then drove from Love's house to San Diego with a backpack, containing three pipe bombs. Carlock detonated the bombs at the front doors of the courthouse, prosecutors said.
Carlock, Sanders and Robinson were charged and each previously pleaded guilty for their parts in the plan.
At the time of the bombing, Love was in "dire financial straits," prosecutors said, and faced jail time stemming from two pending criminal cases.
"The evidence showed that he directed the May 4, 2008, bombing for the purpose of obtaining reward money and a break on his state charges by providing information about the bombing to law enforcement," prosecutors said in a statement.
Question: Who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Yes
Question: What was the name of the person who was found guilty of 10 charges?
Answer:Donny Love
Question: Was anyone injured in the attack?
Answer:No
Question: Where was the bombing?
Answer:San Diego's Edward J. Schwartz Federal Courthouse
Question: When?
Answer:May 4, 2008
Question: Who did Love convince to bomb the courthouse?
Answer:Rachelle Lynette Carlock
Question: Why?
Answer:obtain reward money and a break on his state charges
Question: How long could Love get in prison?
Answer:between 30 years and life
Question: Who was that according to?
Answer:Fred Sheppard
Question: Who is Fred Sheppard?
Answer:Assistant U.S. Attorney
Question: Who else was directed by Love besides Carlock?
Answer:Ella Louise Sanders
Question: What did Love tell them to buy and steal?
Answer:explosive powder and bomb-making materials
Question: What city was Love's house in?
Answer:unknown
Question: Was Love rich?
Answer:No
Question: Who set off the bombs at the courthouse?
Answer:Carlock
Question: How long was the trial?
Answer:two-weeks
Question: Where did Carlock, Robinson and Love drive to with a backpack?
Answer:San Diego
Question: How many pipe bombs did they have?
Answer:three
Question: Did they drive to the San Diego in an SUV?
Answer:unknown
Question: How many pending criminal cases did Love face?
Answer: | two |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer: | Dad |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer:Dad
Question: And what is he called?
Answer: | The Zoo King. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer:Dad
Question: And what is he called?
Answer:The Zoo King.
Question: Who has been kissed?
Answer: | a bear |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer:Dad
Question: And what is he called?
Answer:The Zoo King.
Question: Who has been kissed?
Answer:a bear
Question: Who gets woofed at?
Answer: | the wolves. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer:Dad
Question: And what is he called?
Answer:The Zoo King.
Question: Who has been kissed?
Answer:a bear
Question: Who gets woofed at?
Answer:the wolves.
Question: Who is the favorite animal?
Answer: | the piggy. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer:Dad
Question: And what is he called?
Answer:The Zoo King.
Question: Who has been kissed?
Answer:a bear
Question: Who gets woofed at?
Answer:the wolves.
Question: Who is the favorite animal?
Answer:the piggy.
Question: Is it male or female?
Answer: | Male |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer:Dad
Question: And what is he called?
Answer:The Zoo King.
Question: Who has been kissed?
Answer:a bear
Question: Who gets woofed at?
Answer:the wolves.
Question: Who is the favorite animal?
Answer:the piggy.
Question: Is it male or female?
Answer:Male
Question: What is his name?
Answer: | Samson. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer:Dad
Question: And what is he called?
Answer:The Zoo King.
Question: Who has been kissed?
Answer:a bear
Question: Who gets woofed at?
Answer:the wolves.
Question: Who is the favorite animal?
Answer:the piggy.
Question: Is it male or female?
Answer:Male
Question: What is his name?
Answer:Samson.
Question: What does he like to eat?
Answer: | mustard, |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer:Dad
Question: And what is he called?
Answer:The Zoo King.
Question: Who has been kissed?
Answer:a bear
Question: Who gets woofed at?
Answer:the wolves.
Question: Who is the favorite animal?
Answer:the piggy.
Question: Is it male or female?
Answer:Male
Question: What is his name?
Answer:Samson.
Question: What does he like to eat?
Answer:mustard,
Question: Where did they eat lunch?
Answer: | the Zoo restaurant |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: My dad runs the Blue Street Zoo. Everyone calls him the Zoo King. That means Mom is the Zoo Queen. And that means that I'm the Zoo Prince! Being a prince is very special.
I spend every morning walking around to see the zoo. It's better than any animal book. I say hello to the lions. I say woof at all of the wolves. I make faces to the penguins. Once I even gave a morning kiss to a bear! My favorite animal is the piggy. I named him Samson. He likes to eat mustard, so I toss some mustard jars into his cage every morning. I don't know why that piggy likes mustard so much.
Sometimes I walk around with the Zoo King and Zoo Queen. Then we say hello to the animals together! I really like those days. Everybody who works at the Zoo says hello to us when we walk by. At lunchtime, we all go to the Zoo restaurant and eat pork chops. I hope Samson doesn't get mad about that!
Question: Who runs the zoo?
Answer:Dad
Question: And what is he called?
Answer:The Zoo King.
Question: Who has been kissed?
Answer:a bear
Question: Who gets woofed at?
Answer:the wolves.
Question: Who is the favorite animal?
Answer:the piggy.
Question: Is it male or female?
Answer:Male
Question: What is his name?
Answer:Samson.
Question: What does he like to eat?
Answer:mustard,
Question: Where did they eat lunch?
Answer:the Zoo restaurant
Question: What did they eat?
Answer: | pork chops. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Wang Jiaming from Beijing Chenjinglun High School says he is a lucky boy. He's happy that he's sitting the senior high school entrance exam in 2014 instead of 2016. On Oct 22, Beijing Municipal Commission of Education announced that, from 2016, the English scores in the senior high school entrance exam will be reduced from 120 to 100. Of the 100 points, the listening ability scores will increase to 50. Meanwhile, the points for Chinese will increase from 120 to 150. "The change won't affect me. I feel so lucky because English is my strongest subject," said Wang. Why such a change? It places the importance on Chinese in our study, and reduces students' stress, said Li Yi, spokesman of the commission. "The change will also push us to pay attention to the practical usage of English," said Li. "Students will be encouraged to learn to understand English menus and read English news on mobile phones." There isn't news that other cities will have the same change. But several places are making changes to English tests in the college entrance exams. For example, Shandong is considering taking out the listening part of the English exam in its college entrance exams. But, "being tested for less points doesn't mean the subject _ ," Bai Ping wrote in China Daily. English has long been the world's most commonly used language. Former Chinese premier Zhu Rongji once said: "In a globalizing economy , if you cannot communicate with foreigners, how can one be part of the world economy?" Wang Jiaming said he understood the change. "Chinese, not English, is our mother tongue ," he said. "But still, I think English is both interesting and useful."
Question: who believe he has good fortune?
Answer: | Wang Jiaming |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Wang Jiaming from Beijing Chenjinglun High School says he is a lucky boy. He's happy that he's sitting the senior high school entrance exam in 2014 instead of 2016. On Oct 22, Beijing Municipal Commission of Education announced that, from 2016, the English scores in the senior high school entrance exam will be reduced from 120 to 100. Of the 100 points, the listening ability scores will increase to 50. Meanwhile, the points for Chinese will increase from 120 to 150. "The change won't affect me. I feel so lucky because English is my strongest subject," said Wang. Why such a change? It places the importance on Chinese in our study, and reduces students' stress, said Li Yi, spokesman of the commission. "The change will also push us to pay attention to the practical usage of English," said Li. "Students will be encouraged to learn to understand English menus and read English news on mobile phones." There isn't news that other cities will have the same change. But several places are making changes to English tests in the college entrance exams. For example, Shandong is considering taking out the listening part of the English exam in its college entrance exams. But, "being tested for less points doesn't mean the subject _ ," Bai Ping wrote in China Daily. English has long been the world's most commonly used language. Former Chinese premier Zhu Rongji once said: "In a globalizing economy , if you cannot communicate with foreigners, how can one be part of the world economy?" Wang Jiaming said he understood the change. "Chinese, not English, is our mother tongue ," he said. "But still, I think English is both interesting and useful."
Question: who believe he has good fortune?
Answer:Wang Jiaming
Question: where is he educated?
Answer: | Beijing Chenjinglun High School |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Wang Jiaming from Beijing Chenjinglun High School says he is a lucky boy. He's happy that he's sitting the senior high school entrance exam in 2014 instead of 2016. On Oct 22, Beijing Municipal Commission of Education announced that, from 2016, the English scores in the senior high school entrance exam will be reduced from 120 to 100. Of the 100 points, the listening ability scores will increase to 50. Meanwhile, the points for Chinese will increase from 120 to 150. "The change won't affect me. I feel so lucky because English is my strongest subject," said Wang. Why such a change? It places the importance on Chinese in our study, and reduces students' stress, said Li Yi, spokesman of the commission. "The change will also push us to pay attention to the practical usage of English," said Li. "Students will be encouraged to learn to understand English menus and read English news on mobile phones." There isn't news that other cities will have the same change. But several places are making changes to English tests in the college entrance exams. For example, Shandong is considering taking out the listening part of the English exam in its college entrance exams. But, "being tested for less points doesn't mean the subject _ ," Bai Ping wrote in China Daily. English has long been the world's most commonly used language. Former Chinese premier Zhu Rongji once said: "In a globalizing economy , if you cannot communicate with foreigners, how can one be part of the world economy?" Wang Jiaming said he understood the change. "Chinese, not English, is our mother tongue ," he said. "But still, I think English is both interesting and useful."
Question: who believe he has good fortune?
Answer:Wang Jiaming
Question: where is he educated?
Answer:Beijing Chenjinglun High School
Question: is he testing?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Wang Jiaming from Beijing Chenjinglun High School says he is a lucky boy. He's happy that he's sitting the senior high school entrance exam in 2014 instead of 2016. On Oct 22, Beijing Municipal Commission of Education announced that, from 2016, the English scores in the senior high school entrance exam will be reduced from 120 to 100. Of the 100 points, the listening ability scores will increase to 50. Meanwhile, the points for Chinese will increase from 120 to 150. "The change won't affect me. I feel so lucky because English is my strongest subject," said Wang. Why such a change? It places the importance on Chinese in our study, and reduces students' stress, said Li Yi, spokesman of the commission. "The change will also push us to pay attention to the practical usage of English," said Li. "Students will be encouraged to learn to understand English menus and read English news on mobile phones." There isn't news that other cities will have the same change. But several places are making changes to English tests in the college entrance exams. For example, Shandong is considering taking out the listening part of the English exam in its college entrance exams. But, "being tested for less points doesn't mean the subject _ ," Bai Ping wrote in China Daily. English has long been the world's most commonly used language. Former Chinese premier Zhu Rongji once said: "In a globalizing economy , if you cannot communicate with foreigners, how can one be part of the world economy?" Wang Jiaming said he understood the change. "Chinese, not English, is our mother tongue ," he said. "But still, I think English is both interesting and useful."
Question: who believe he has good fortune?
Answer:Wang Jiaming
Question: where is he educated?
Answer:Beijing Chenjinglun High School
Question: is he testing?
Answer:Yes
Question: what is the test called?
Answer: | the senior high school entrance exam |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Wang Jiaming from Beijing Chenjinglun High School says he is a lucky boy. He's happy that he's sitting the senior high school entrance exam in 2014 instead of 2016. On Oct 22, Beijing Municipal Commission of Education announced that, from 2016, the English scores in the senior high school entrance exam will be reduced from 120 to 100. Of the 100 points, the listening ability scores will increase to 50. Meanwhile, the points for Chinese will increase from 120 to 150. "The change won't affect me. I feel so lucky because English is my strongest subject," said Wang. Why such a change? It places the importance on Chinese in our study, and reduces students' stress, said Li Yi, spokesman of the commission. "The change will also push us to pay attention to the practical usage of English," said Li. "Students will be encouraged to learn to understand English menus and read English news on mobile phones." There isn't news that other cities will have the same change. But several places are making changes to English tests in the college entrance exams. For example, Shandong is considering taking out the listening part of the English exam in its college entrance exams. But, "being tested for less points doesn't mean the subject _ ," Bai Ping wrote in China Daily. English has long been the world's most commonly used language. Former Chinese premier Zhu Rongji once said: "In a globalizing economy , if you cannot communicate with foreigners, how can one be part of the world economy?" Wang Jiaming said he understood the change. "Chinese, not English, is our mother tongue ," he said. "But still, I think English is both interesting and useful."
Question: who believe he has good fortune?
Answer:Wang Jiaming
Question: where is he educated?
Answer:Beijing Chenjinglun High School
Question: is he testing?
Answer:Yes
Question: what is the test called?
Answer:the senior high school entrance exam
Question: when is he testing?
Answer: | 2014 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Wang Jiaming from Beijing Chenjinglun High School says he is a lucky boy. He's happy that he's sitting the senior high school entrance exam in 2014 instead of 2016. On Oct 22, Beijing Municipal Commission of Education announced that, from 2016, the English scores in the senior high school entrance exam will be reduced from 120 to 100. Of the 100 points, the listening ability scores will increase to 50. Meanwhile, the points for Chinese will increase from 120 to 150. "The change won't affect me. I feel so lucky because English is my strongest subject," said Wang. Why such a change? It places the importance on Chinese in our study, and reduces students' stress, said Li Yi, spokesman of the commission. "The change will also push us to pay attention to the practical usage of English," said Li. "Students will be encouraged to learn to understand English menus and read English news on mobile phones." There isn't news that other cities will have the same change. But several places are making changes to English tests in the college entrance exams. For example, Shandong is considering taking out the listening part of the English exam in its college entrance exams. But, "being tested for less points doesn't mean the subject _ ," Bai Ping wrote in China Daily. English has long been the world's most commonly used language. Former Chinese premier Zhu Rongji once said: "In a globalizing economy , if you cannot communicate with foreigners, how can one be part of the world economy?" Wang Jiaming said he understood the change. "Chinese, not English, is our mother tongue ," he said. "But still, I think English is both interesting and useful."
Question: who believe he has good fortune?
Answer:Wang Jiaming
Question: where is he educated?
Answer:Beijing Chenjinglun High School
Question: is he testing?
Answer:Yes
Question: what is the test called?
Answer:the senior high school entrance exam
Question: when is he testing?
Answer:2014
Question: is really good in one class?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: So, there was this kid named Jack that came up to my beanstalk one day. I couldn't believe my eyes, so I put down my ham sandwich I was eating and looked at him. I'm not sure what he thought he was doing there, but he sure did talk a lot. He kept asking me questions about this and then he asked me some questions about that and I was getting a little bit tired of all of the questions.
When I thought I wouldn't hear the end of everything, this Jack kid asked me about the one and only secret that I've always kept to myself. That no one even knew about! No, it wasn't about my golden guitar or even my goose that laid eggs filled with coins. No, he was asking me about my beans and their roots.
You see, I'm a giant and my job is to make sure the bean roots that we use to get down to earth are well protected and guarded. They're what helps us get down to the little person world when we need to. I became a little bit worried as the little kid asked more and more questions about my roots. I didn't want to tell him that my roots were hidden in the library!
I walked over to him to pick this little kid up to get him to quiet down about the bean roots, well, he got me with his little knife and I dropped him! Thankfully, he didn't get hurt or I would've been so sad!
He ran down the beanstalk when I chased after him. I guess he wanted to get back to his little people. I didn't follow him, but I sure hope he doesn't come back for my stuff.
Question: Who looks after the bean roots?
Answer: | A giants |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: So, there was this kid named Jack that came up to my beanstalk one day. I couldn't believe my eyes, so I put down my ham sandwich I was eating and looked at him. I'm not sure what he thought he was doing there, but he sure did talk a lot. He kept asking me questions about this and then he asked me some questions about that and I was getting a little bit tired of all of the questions.
When I thought I wouldn't hear the end of everything, this Jack kid asked me about the one and only secret that I've always kept to myself. That no one even knew about! No, it wasn't about my golden guitar or even my goose that laid eggs filled with coins. No, he was asking me about my beans and their roots.
You see, I'm a giant and my job is to make sure the bean roots that we use to get down to earth are well protected and guarded. They're what helps us get down to the little person world when we need to. I became a little bit worried as the little kid asked more and more questions about my roots. I didn't want to tell him that my roots were hidden in the library!
I walked over to him to pick this little kid up to get him to quiet down about the bean roots, well, he got me with his little knife and I dropped him! Thankfully, he didn't get hurt or I would've been so sad!
He ran down the beanstalk when I chased after him. I guess he wanted to get back to his little people. I didn't follow him, but I sure hope he doesn't come back for my stuff.
Question: Who looks after the bean roots?
Answer:A giants
Question: How does he care for them?
Answer: | making sure they are protected and guarded. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: So, there was this kid named Jack that came up to my beanstalk one day. I couldn't believe my eyes, so I put down my ham sandwich I was eating and looked at him. I'm not sure what he thought he was doing there, but he sure did talk a lot. He kept asking me questions about this and then he asked me some questions about that and I was getting a little bit tired of all of the questions.
When I thought I wouldn't hear the end of everything, this Jack kid asked me about the one and only secret that I've always kept to myself. That no one even knew about! No, it wasn't about my golden guitar or even my goose that laid eggs filled with coins. No, he was asking me about my beans and their roots.
You see, I'm a giant and my job is to make sure the bean roots that we use to get down to earth are well protected and guarded. They're what helps us get down to the little person world when we need to. I became a little bit worried as the little kid asked more and more questions about my roots. I didn't want to tell him that my roots were hidden in the library!
I walked over to him to pick this little kid up to get him to quiet down about the bean roots, well, he got me with his little knife and I dropped him! Thankfully, he didn't get hurt or I would've been so sad!
He ran down the beanstalk when I chased after him. I guess he wanted to get back to his little people. I didn't follow him, but I sure hope he doesn't come back for my stuff.
Question: Who looks after the bean roots?
Answer:A giants
Question: How does he care for them?
Answer:making sure they are protected and guarded.
Question: Why are they important?
Answer: | they help us get down to the little person world when we need to |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: So, there was this kid named Jack that came up to my beanstalk one day. I couldn't believe my eyes, so I put down my ham sandwich I was eating and looked at him. I'm not sure what he thought he was doing there, but he sure did talk a lot. He kept asking me questions about this and then he asked me some questions about that and I was getting a little bit tired of all of the questions.
When I thought I wouldn't hear the end of everything, this Jack kid asked me about the one and only secret that I've always kept to myself. That no one even knew about! No, it wasn't about my golden guitar or even my goose that laid eggs filled with coins. No, he was asking me about my beans and their roots.
You see, I'm a giant and my job is to make sure the bean roots that we use to get down to earth are well protected and guarded. They're what helps us get down to the little person world when we need to. I became a little bit worried as the little kid asked more and more questions about my roots. I didn't want to tell him that my roots were hidden in the library!
I walked over to him to pick this little kid up to get him to quiet down about the bean roots, well, he got me with his little knife and I dropped him! Thankfully, he didn't get hurt or I would've been so sad!
He ran down the beanstalk when I chased after him. I guess he wanted to get back to his little people. I didn't follow him, but I sure hope he doesn't come back for my stuff.
Question: Who looks after the bean roots?
Answer:A giants
Question: How does he care for them?
Answer:making sure they are protected and guarded.
Question: Why are they important?
Answer:they help us get down to the little person world when we need to
Question: Who was talking to the giant?
Answer: | Jack |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: So, there was this kid named Jack that came up to my beanstalk one day. I couldn't believe my eyes, so I put down my ham sandwich I was eating and looked at him. I'm not sure what he thought he was doing there, but he sure did talk a lot. He kept asking me questions about this and then he asked me some questions about that and I was getting a little bit tired of all of the questions.
When I thought I wouldn't hear the end of everything, this Jack kid asked me about the one and only secret that I've always kept to myself. That no one even knew about! No, it wasn't about my golden guitar or even my goose that laid eggs filled with coins. No, he was asking me about my beans and their roots.
You see, I'm a giant and my job is to make sure the bean roots that we use to get down to earth are well protected and guarded. They're what helps us get down to the little person world when we need to. I became a little bit worried as the little kid asked more and more questions about my roots. I didn't want to tell him that my roots were hidden in the library!
I walked over to him to pick this little kid up to get him to quiet down about the bean roots, well, he got me with his little knife and I dropped him! Thankfully, he didn't get hurt or I would've been so sad!
He ran down the beanstalk when I chased after him. I guess he wanted to get back to his little people. I didn't follow him, but I sure hope he doesn't come back for my stuff.
Question: Who looks after the bean roots?
Answer:A giants
Question: How does he care for them?
Answer:making sure they are protected and guarded.
Question: Why are they important?
Answer:they help us get down to the little person world when we need to
Question: Who was talking to the giant?
Answer:Jack
Question: Was he quiet?
Answer: | no |