awacke1/Arxiv-Paper-Search-And-QA-RAG-Pattern

What is Self Rewarding AI?

Advanced Settings
▼
LLM Answer
Self rewarding AI is not a specific term mentioned in the given abstracts. However, some of the abstracts discuss methods that encourage self-improvement or self-supervision in AI training.

The abstracts "Memory Augmented Self-Play" and "Self-Supervised Online Reward Shaping in Sparse-Reward Environments" discuss methods where the AI agent learns from its own experiences without external rewards, and uses its memory or densifies rewards to improve learning efficiency.

The abstract "Self Improvement Based REwards for Adaptive Feedback in Reinforcement Learning" proposes a reward shaping approach called Self Improvement Based REwards (SIBRE) that rewards improvement over the agent's own past performance, encouraging self-improvement in reinforcement learning.

The abstract "A General Purpose Supervisory Signal for Embodied Agents" introduces the Scene Graph Contrastive (SGC) loss, which uses contrastive learning to align an agent's representation with a rich graphical encoding of its environment, encouraging representations that encode objects' semantics, relationships, and history.

Therefore, while none of the abstracts directly refer to "self rewarding AI" as a specific concept, they do discuss methods that encourage self-improvement or self-supervision in AI training.

Sources:

Scene Graph Contrastive (SGC) loss for Embodied Agents
Memory Augmented Self-Play
Self-supervised Online Reward Shaping in Sparse-Reward Environments
SALMON: Self-ALIgnMent with principle-fOllowiNg reward models
SIBRE: Self Improvement Based REwards for Adaptive Feedback in Reinforcement Learning.
🩺🔍 Search Results
01 Dec 2022 |
A General Purpose Supervisory Signal for Embodied Agents
|
⬇️
Kunal Pratap Singh, Jordi Salvador, Luca Weihs, Aniruddha Kembhavi

Training effective embodied AI agents often involves manual reward engineering, expert imitation, specialized components such as maps, or leveraging additional sensors for depth and localization. Another approach is to use neural architectures alongside self-supervised objectives which encourage better representation learning. In practice, there are few guarantees that these self-supervised objectives encode task-relevant information. We propose the Scene Graph Contrastive (SGC) loss, which uses scene graphs as general-purpose, training-only, supervisory signals. The SGC loss does away with explicit graph decoding and instead uses contrastive learning to align an agent's representation with a rich graphical encoding of its environment. The SGC loss is generally applicable, simple to implement, and encourages representations that encode objects' semantics, relationships, and history. Using the SGC loss, we attain significant gains on three embodied tasks: Object Navigation, Multi-Object Navigation, and Arm Point Navigation. Finally, we present studies and analyses which demonstrate the ability of our trained representation to encode semantic cues about the environment.

01 Jun 2018 |
Memory Augmented Self-Play
|
⬇️
Shagun Sodhani, Vardaan Pahuja

Self-play is an unsupervised training procedure which enables the reinforcement learning agents to explore the environment without requiring any external rewards. We augment the self-play setting by providing an external memory where the agent can store experience from the previous tasks. This enables the agent to come up with more diverse self-play tasks resulting in faster exploration of the environment. The agent pretrained in the memory augmented self-play setting easily outperforms the agent pretrained in no-memory self-play setting.

26 Jul 2021 |
Self-Supervised Online Reward Shaping in Sparse-Reward Environments
|
⬇️
Farzan Memarian, Wonjoon Goo, Rudolf Lioutikov, Scott Niekum, Ufuk Topcu

We introduce Self-supervised Online Reward Shaping (SORS), which aims to improve the sample efficiency of any RL algorithm in sparse-reward environments by automatically densifying rewards. The proposed framework alternates between classification-based reward inference and policy update steps -- the original sparse reward provides a self-supervisory signal for reward inference by ranking trajectories that the agent observes, while the policy update is performed with the newly inferred, typically dense reward function. We introduce theory that shows that, under certain conditions, this alteration of the reward function will not change the optimal policy of the original MDP, while potentially increasing learning speed significantly. Experimental results on several sparse-reward environments demonstrate that, across multiple domains, the proposed algorithm is not only significantly more sample efficient than a standard RL baseline using sparse rewards, but, at times, also achieves similar sample efficiency compared to when hand-designed dense reward functions are used.

09 Oct 2023 |
SALMON: Self-Alignment with Principle-Following Reward Models
|
⬇️
Zhiqing Sun, Yikang Shen, Hongxin Zhang, Qinhong Zhou, Zhenfang Chen, David Cox, Yiming Yang, Chuang Gan

Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on response demonstrations combined with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) constitutes a powerful paradigm for aligning LLM-based AI agents. However, a significant limitation of such an approach is its dependency on high-quality human annotations, making its application to intricate tasks challenging due to difficulties in obtaining consistent response demonstrations and in-distribution response preferences. This paper presents a novel approach, namely SALMON (Self-ALignMent with principle-fOllowiNg reward models), to align base language models with minimal human supervision, using only a small set of human-defined principles, yet achieving superior performance. Central to our approach is a principle-following reward model. Trained on synthetic preference data, this model can generate reward scores based on arbitrary human-defined principles. By merely adjusting these principles during the RL training phase, we gain full control over the preferences with the reward model, subsequently influencing the behavior of the RL-trained policies, and eliminating the reliance on the collection of online human preferences. Applying our method to the LLaMA-2-70b base language model, we developed an AI assistant named Dromedary-2. With only 6 exemplars for in-context learning and 31 human-defined principles, Dromedary-2 significantly surpasses the performance of several state-of-the-art AI systems, including LLaMA-2-Chat-70b, on various benchmark datasets. We have open-sourced the code and model weights to encourage further research into aligning LLM-based AI agents with enhanced supervision efficiency, improved controllability, and scalable oversight.

21 Dec 2020 |
SIBRE: Self Improvement Based REwards for Adaptive Feedback in Reinforcement Learning
|
⬇️
Somjit Nath, Richa Verma, Abhik Ray, Harshad Khadilkar

We propose a generic reward shaping approach for improving the rate of convergence in reinforcement learning (RL), called Self Improvement Based REwards, or SIBRE. The approach is designed for use in conjunction with any existing RL algorithm, and consists of rewarding improvement over the agent's own past performance. We prove that SIBRE converges in expectation under the same conditions as the original RL algorithm. The reshaped rewards help discriminate between policies when the original rewards are weakly discriminated or sparse. Experiments on several well-known benchmark environments with different RL algorithms show that SIBRE converges to the optimal policy faster and more stably. We also perform sensitivity analysis with respect to hyper-parameters, in comparison with baseline RL algorithms.

13 Jul 2022 |
Inferring and Conveying Intentionality: Beyond Numerical Rewards to Logical Intentions
|
⬇️
Susmit Jha and John Rushby

Shared intentionality is a critical component in developing conscious AI agents capable of collaboration, self-reflection, deliberation, and reasoning. We formulate inference of shared intentionality as an inverse reinforcement learning problem with logical reward specifications. We show how the approach can infer task descriptions from demonstrations. We also extend our approach to actively convey intentionality. We demonstrate the approach on a simple grid-world example.

23 Mar 2018 |
Modeling Others using Oneself in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
|
⬇️
Roberta Raileanu, Emily Denton, Arthur Szlam, Rob Fergus

We consider the multi-agent reinforcement learning setting with imperfect information in which each agent is trying to maximize its own utility. The reward function depends on the hidden state (or goal) of both agents, so the agents must infer the other players' hidden goals from their observed behavior in order to solve the tasks. We propose a new approach for learning in these domains: Self Other-Modeling (SOM), in which an agent uses its own policy to predict the other agent's actions and update its belief of their hidden state in an online manner. We evaluate this approach on three different tasks and show that the agents are able to learn better policies using their estimate of the other players' hidden states, in both cooperative and adversarial settings.

11 Oct 2022 |
Mastering the Game of No-Press Diplomacy via Human-Regularized Reinforcement Learning and Planning
|
⬇️
Anton Bakhtin, David J Wu, Adam Lerer, Jonathan Gray, Athul Paul Jacob, Gabriele Farina, Alexander H Miller, Noam Brown

No-press Diplomacy is a complex strategy game involving both cooperation and competition that has served as a benchmark for multi-agent AI research. While self-play reinforcement learning has resulted in numerous successes in purely adversarial games like chess, Go, and poker, self-play alone is insufficient for achieving optimal performance in domains involving cooperation with humans. We address this shortcoming by first introducing a planning algorithm we call DiL-piKL that regularizes a reward-maximizing policy toward a human imitation-learned policy. We prove that this is a no-regret learning algorithm under a modified utility function. We then show that DiL-piKL can be extended into a self-play reinforcement learning algorithm we call RL-DiL-piKL that provides a model of human play while simultaneously training an agent that responds well to this human model. We used RL-DiL-piKL to train an agent we name Diplodocus. In a 200-game no-press Diplomacy tournament involving 62 human participants spanning skill levels from beginner to expert, two Diplodocus agents both achieved a higher average score than all other participants who played more than two games, and ranked first and third according to an Elo ratings model.

28 Jan 2022 |
Any-Play: An Intrinsic Augmentation for Zero-Shot Coordination
|
⬇️
Keane Lucas and Ross E. Allen

Cooperative artificial intelligence with human or superhuman proficiency in collaborative tasks stands at the frontier of machine learning research. Prior work has tended to evaluate cooperative AI performance under the restrictive paradigms of self-play (teams composed of agents trained together) and cross-play (teams of agents trained independently but using the same algorithm). Recent work has indicated that AI optimized for these narrow settings may make for undesirable collaborators in the real-world. We formalize an alternative criteria for evaluating cooperative AI, referred to as inter-algorithm cross-play, where agents are evaluated on teaming performance with all other agents within an experiment pool with no assumption of algorithmic similarities between agents. We show that existing state-of-the-art cooperative AI algorithms, such as Other-Play and Off-Belief Learning, under-perform in this paradigm. We propose the Any-Play learning augmentation -- a multi-agent extension of diversity-based intrinsic rewards for zero-shot coordination (ZSC) -- for generalizing self-play-based algorithms to the inter-algorithm cross-play setting. We apply the Any-Play learning augmentation to the Simplified Action Decoder (SAD) and demonstrate state-of-the-art performance in the collaborative card game Hanabi.

31 Dec 2022 |
New Challenges in Reinforcement Learning: A Survey of Security and Privacy
|
⬇️
Yunjiao Lei, Dayong Ye, Sheng Shen, Yulei Sui, Tianqing Zhu, Wanlei Zhou

Reinforcement learning (RL) is one of the most important branches of AI. Due to its capacity for self-adaption and decision-making in dynamic environments, reinforcement learning has been widely applied in multiple areas, such as healthcare, data markets, autonomous driving, and robotics. However, some of these applications and systems have been shown to be vulnerable to security or privacy attacks, resulting in unreliable or unstable services. A large number of studies have focused on these security and privacy problems in reinforcement learning. However, few surveys have provided a systematic review and comparison of existing problems and state-of-the-art solutions to keep up with the pace of emerging threats. Accordingly, we herein present such a comprehensive review to explain and summarize the challenges associated with security and privacy in reinforcement learning from a new perspective, namely that of the Markov Decision Process (MDP). In this survey, we first introduce the key concepts related to this area. Next, we cover the security and privacy issues linked to the state, action, environment, and reward function of the MDP process, respectively. We further highlight the special characteristics of security and privacy methodologies related to reinforcement learning. Finally, we discuss the possible future research directions within this area.

22 Dec 2020 |
Self-Imitation Advantage Learning
|
⬇️
Johan Ferret, Olivier Pietquin, Matthieu Geist

Self-imitation learning is a Reinforcement Learning (RL) method that encourages actions whose returns were higher than expected, which helps in hard exploration and sparse reward problems. It was shown to improve the performance of on-policy actor-critic methods in several discrete control tasks. Nevertheless, applying self-imitation to the mostly action-value based off-policy RL methods is not straightforward. We propose SAIL, a novel generalization of self-imitation learning for off-policy RL, based on a modification of the Bellman optimality operator that we connect to Advantage Learning. Crucially, our method mitigates the problem of stale returns by choosing the most optimistic return estimate between the observed return and the current action-value for self-imitation. We demonstrate the empirical effectiveness of SAIL on the Arcade Learning Environment, with a focus on hard exploration games.

15 Dec 2022 |
Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
|
⬇️
Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jackson Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, Carol Chen, Catherine Olsson, Christopher Olah, Danny Hernandez, Dawn Drain, Deep Ganguli, Dustin Li, Eli Tran-Johnson, Ethan Perez, Jamie Kerr, Jared Mueller, Jeffrey Ladish, Joshua Landau, Kamal Ndousse, Kamile Lukosuite, Liane Lovitt, Michael Sellitto, Nelson Elhage, Nicholas Schiefer, Noemi Mercado, Nova DasSarma, Robert Lasenby, Robin Larson, Sam Ringer, Scott Johnston, Shauna Kravec, Sheer El Showk, Stanislav Fort, Tamera Lanham, Timothy Telleen-Lawton, Tom Conerly, Tom Henighan, Tristan Hume, Samuel R. Bowman, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Ben Mann, Dario Amodei, Nicholas Joseph, Sam McCandlish, Tom Brown, Jared Kaplan

As AI systems become more capable, we would like to enlist their help to supervise other AIs. We experiment with methods for training a harmless AI assistant through self-improvement, without any human labels identifying harmful outputs. The only human oversight is provided through a list of rules or principles, and so we refer to the method as 'Constitutional AI'. The process involves both a supervised learning and a reinforcement learning phase. In the supervised phase we sample from an initial model, then generate self-critiques and revisions, and then finetune the original model on revised responses. In the RL phase, we sample from the finetuned model, use a model to evaluate which of the two samples is better, and then train a preference model from this dataset of AI preferences. We then train with RL using the preference model as the reward signal, i.e. we use 'RL from AI Feedback' (RLAIF). As a result we are able to train a harmless but non-evasive AI assistant that engages with harmful queries by explaining its objections to them. Both the SL and RL methods can leverage chain-of-thought style reasoning to improve the human-judged performance and transparency of AI decision making. These methods make it possible to control AI behavior more precisely and with far fewer human labels.

08 Jan 2024 |
A Minimaximalist Approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
|
⬇️
Gokul Swamy, Christoph Dann, Rahul Kidambi, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Alekh Agarwal

We present Self-Play Preference Optimization (SPO), an algorithm for reinforcement learning from human feedback. Our approach is minimalist in that it does not require training a reward model nor unstable adversarial training and is therefore rather simple to implement. Our approach is maximalist in that it provably handles non-Markovian, intransitive, and stochastic preferences while being robust to the compounding errors that plague offline approaches to sequential prediction. To achieve the preceding qualities, we build upon the concept of a Minimax Winner (MW), a notion of preference aggregation from the social choice theory literature that frames learning from preferences as a zero-sum game between two policies. By leveraging the symmetry of this game, we prove that rather than using the traditional technique of dueling two policies to compute the MW, we can simply have a single agent play against itself while maintaining strong convergence guarantees. Practically, this corresponds to sampling multiple trajectories from a policy, asking a rater or preference model to compare them, and then using the proportion of wins as the reward for a particular trajectory. We demonstrate that on a suite of continuous control tasks, we are able to learn significantly more efficiently than reward-model based approaches while maintaining robustness to the intransitive and stochastic preferences that frequently occur in practice when aggregating human judgments.

01 Nov 2023 |
Enhanced Generalization through Prioritization and Diversity in Self-Imitation Reinforcement Learning over Procedural Environments with Sparse Rewards
|
⬇️
Alain Andres, Daochen Zha and Javier Del Ser

Exploration poses a fundamental challenge in Reinforcement Learning (RL) with sparse rewards, limiting an agent's ability to learn optimal decision-making due to a lack of informative feedback signals. Self-Imitation Learning (self-IL) has emerged as a promising approach for exploration, leveraging a replay buffer to store and reproduce successful behaviors. However, traditional self-IL methods, which rely on high-return transitions and assume singleton environments, face challenges in generalization, especially in procedurally-generated (PCG) environments. Therefore, new self-IL methods have been proposed to rank which experiences to persist, but they replay transitions uniformly regardless of their significance, and do not address the diversity of the stored demonstrations. In this work, we propose tailored self-IL sampling strategies by prioritizing transitions in different ways and extending prioritization techniques to PCG environments. We also address diversity loss through modifications to counteract the impact of generalization requirements and bias introduced by prioritization techniques. Our experimental analysis, conducted over three PCG sparse reward environments, including MiniGrid and ProcGen, highlights the benefits of our proposed modifications, achieving a new state-of-the-art performance in the MiniGrid-MultiRoom-N12-S10 environment.

18 Jan 2023 |
DIRECT: Learning from Sparse and Shifting Rewards using Discriminative Reward Co-Training
|
⬇️
Philipp Altmann, Thomy Phan, Fabian Ritz, Thomas Gabor and Claudia Linnhoff-Popien

We propose discriminative reward co-training (DIRECT) as an extension to deep reinforcement learning algorithms. Building upon the concept of self-imitation learning (SIL), we introduce an imitation buffer to store beneficial trajectories generated by the policy determined by their return. A discriminator network is trained concurrently to the policy to distinguish between trajectories generated by the current policy and beneficial trajectories generated by previous policies. The discriminator's verdict is used to construct a reward signal for optimizing the policy. By interpolating prior experience, DIRECT is able to act as a surrogate, steering policy optimization towards more valuable regions of the reward landscape thus learning an optimal policy. Our results show that DIRECT outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms in sparse- and shifting-reward environments being able to provide a surrogate reward to the policy and direct the optimization towards valuable areas.

15 Sep 2023 |
Learning by Self-Explaining
|
⬇️
Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, David Steinmann, Hikaru Shindo and Kristian Kersting

Artificial intelligence (AI) research has a long track record of drawing inspirations from findings from biology, in particular human intelligence. In contrast to current AI research that mainly treats explanations as a means for model inspection, a somewhat neglected finding from human psychology is the benefit of self-explaining in an agents' learning process. Motivated by this, we introduce a novel learning paradigm, termed Learning by Self-Explaining (LSX). The underlying idea is that a learning module (learner) performs a base task, e.g. image classification, and provides explanations to its decisions. An internal critic module next evaluates the quality of these explanations given the original task. Finally, the learner is refined with the critic's feedback and the loop is repeated as required. The intuition behind this is that an explanation is considered "good" if the critic can perform the same task given the respective explanation. Despite many implementation possibilities the structure of any LSX instantiation can be taxonomized based on four learning modules which we identify as: Fit, Explain, Reflect and Revise. In our work, we provide distinct instantiations of LSX for two different learner models, each illustrating different choices for the various LSX components. We broadly evaluate these on several datasets and show that Learning by Self-Explaining not only boosts the generalization abilities of AI models, particularly in small-data regimes, but also aids in mitigating the influence of confounding factors, as well as leading to more task specific and faithful model explanations. Overall, our results provide experimental evidence of the potential of self-explaining within the learning phase of an AI model.

25 May 2021 |
Self-Imitation Learning for Robot Tasks with Sparse and Delayed Rewards
|
⬇️
Zhixin Chen, Mengxiang Lin

The application of reinforcement learning (RL) in robotic control is still limited in the environments with sparse and delayed rewards. In this paper, we propose a practical self-imitation learning method named Self-Imitation Learning with Constant Reward (SILCR). Instead of requiring hand-defined immediate rewards from environments, our method assigns the immediate rewards at each timestep with constant values according to their final episodic rewards. In this way, even if the dense rewards from environments are unavailable, every action taken by the agents would be guided properly. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in some challenging continuous robotics control tasks in MuJoCo simulation and the results show that our method significantly outperforms the alternative methods in tasks with sparse and delayed rewards. Even compared with alternatives with dense rewards available, our method achieves competitive performance. The ablation experiments also show the stability and reproducibility of our method.

20 Feb 2024 |
SemiReward: A General Reward Model for Semi-supervised Learning
|
⬇️
Siyuan Li, Weiyang Jin, Zedong Wang, Fang Wu, Zicheng Liu, Cheng Tan, Stan Z. Li

Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has witnessed great progress with various improvements in the self-training framework with pseudo labeling. The main challenge is how to distinguish high-quality pseudo labels against the confirmation bias. However, existing pseudo-label selection strategies are limited to pre-defined schemes or complex hand-crafted policies specially designed for classification, failing to achieve high-quality labels, fast convergence, and task versatility simultaneously. To these ends, we propose a Semi-supervised Reward framework (SemiReward) that predicts reward scores to evaluate and filter out high-quality pseudo labels, which is pluggable to mainstream SSL methods in wide task types and scenarios. To mitigate confirmation bias, SemiReward is trained online in two stages with a generator model and subsampling strategy. With classification and regression tasks on 13 standard SSL benchmarks across three modalities, extensive experiments verify that SemiReward achieves significant performance gains and faster convergence speeds upon Pseudo Label, FlexMatch, and Free/SoftMatch. Code and models are available at https://github.com/Westlake-AI/SemiReward.

06 Dec 2018 |
Ranked Reward: Enabling Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization
|
⬇️
Alexandre Laterre and Yunguan Fu and Mohamed Khalil Jabri and Alain-Sam Cohen and David Kas and Karl Hajjar and Torbjorn S. Dahl and Amine Kerkeni and Karim Beguir

Adversarial self-play in two-player games has delivered impressive results when used with reinforcement learning algorithms that combine deep neural networks and tree search. Algorithms like AlphaZero and Expert Iteration learn tabula-rasa, producing highly informative training data on the fly. However, the self-play training strategy is not directly applicable to single-player games. Recently, several practically important combinatorial optimisation problems, such as the travelling salesman problem and the bin packing problem, have been reformulated as reinforcement learning problems, increasing the importance of enabling the benefits of self-play beyond two-player games. We present the Ranked Reward (R2) algorithm which accomplishes this by ranking the rewards obtained by a single agent over multiple games to create a relative performance metric. Results from applying the R2 algorithm to instances of a two-dimensional and three-dimensional bin packing problems show that it outperforms generic Monte Carlo tree search, heuristic algorithms and integer programming solvers. We also present an analysis of the ranked reward mechanism, in particular, the effects of problem instances with varying difficulty and different ranking thresholds.

25 Oct 2020 |
Online Semi-Supervised Learning in Contextual Bandits with Episodic Reward
|
⬇️
Baihan Lin

We considered a novel practical problem of online learning with episodically revealed rewards, motivated by several real-world applications, where the contexts are nonstationary over different episodes and the reward feedbacks are not always available to the decision making agents. For this online semi-supervised learning setting, we introduced Background Episodic Reward LinUCB (BerlinUCB), a solution that easily incorporates clustering as a self-supervision module to provide useful side information when rewards are not observed. Our experiments on a variety of datasets, both in stationary and nonstationary environments of six different scenarios, demonstrated clear advantages of the proposed approach over the standard contextual bandit. Lastly, we introduced a relevant real-life example where this problem setting is especially useful.