Datasets:

SamagraDataGov

/

test_test_whisperft__audio

like 0

Versus ms sheela abhay lodha @ ors. On 18 december, 2023 : jasmeet singh, j cont.cas(c) 232/2015 1.

Versus sheela abhay lodha & ors ..... Respondents through: mr. Siddharth dave, sr. Adv., mr. Jeevesh nagrath, spp 12 + cont.cas(c) 233/2015, cm appl. 14364/2021, cm appl.

The state trading corporation of india ... Versus ms sheela abhay lodha @ ors.

40592/2019, cm appl. 14365/2021 the state trading corporation of india ltd ..... Petitioner through: mr. Dinesh agnani, sr. Adv. With ms. Madhu sudan bhayana, mr. Vikrant rana, advs.

It is stated that the material in respect of these 7 l/cs were duly received by the respondent number 1. 8. Ampl and respondent nos.

6. As per clause 1.0 of the moa, it was the duty of ampl to identify and finalise procurement of raw materials with foreign/indian suppliers and inform to the petitioner, details of quantities,

specifications, price, shipment/delivery schedule etc. (hereinafter "raw material") from domestic market as well as from overseas countries. 4. After various negotiations and discussions, petitioner

company consented to grant financial assistance to ampl to buy from domestic market as well as overseas countries. 5. All the said cheques were signed and issued by respondent no.2 for and on behalf

of ampl. The respondents assuredthe state trading corporation of india ... Versus ms sheela abhay lodha @ ors. On 18 december, 2023 Presentation. 9. The petitioner, on request of ampl, opened 69

l/cs in favour of suppliers, out of which 7 l/cs became overdue much beyond their respective due dates, totalling to rupees 124 crores (excluding interest). Adv., mr. Jeevesh nagrath, spp signature

not verified digitally signed cont.cas(c) 232/2015 & cont.cas(c) 233/2015 page 1 of 21 by:amit arora signing date:18.12.2023 18:54:31 coram: hon'ble mr. Justice jasmeet singhthe state trading

corporation of india ... The memorandum of agreement (hereinafter "moa") and the addendum thereto were executed and signed by and between the petitioner and ampl on 26.11.2007/23.04.2009 and

18.03.2008/22.05.2008 respectively, which contained all terms and conditions so agreed between the parties. 40625/2019 the state trading corporation of india ltd ..... Petitioner through: mr. Dinesh

agnani, sr. Adv. With ms. Madhu sudan bhayana, mr. Vikrant rana, advs. Versus ms sheela abhay lodha & ors. ..... Respondents through: mr. Siddharth dave, sr. On 18 december, 2023 author: jasmeet

singh bench: jasmeet singh $~11 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi judgment reserved on: 19.09.2023 judgment pronounced on: 18.12.2023 + cont.cas(c) 232/2015, cm appl. On receipt of details,

the petitioner was to sign contract with foreign/indian suppliers and open foreign/indian letter of credit (hereinafter "l/c") in favour of supplier for each indent/transaction. Further, it was the

obligation of ampl to discharge the amount of l/c on its respective due date. &ors.". Brief facts 2. The brief facts as per the petitioner are as under:- 3. The petitioner company filed a complaint

under sections 138, 141, 142 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881(hereinafter "ni act") against akshata mercantile pvt.