Datasets:
language:
- en
license: mit
size_categories:
- n<1K
task_categories:
- text2text-generation
pretty_name: ClassEval
tags:
- code-generation
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/test-*
dataset_info:
features:
- name: task_id
dtype: string
- name: skeleton
dtype: string
- name: test
dtype: string
- name: solution_code
dtype: string
- name: import_statement
sequence: string
- name: class_description
dtype: string
- name: methods_info
list:
- name: method_name
dtype: string
- name: method_description
dtype: string
- name: test_class
dtype: string
- name: test_code
dtype: string
- name: solution_code
dtype: string
- name: dependencies
struct:
- name: Standalone
dtype: bool
- name: lib_dependencies
sequence: string
- name: field_dependencies
sequence: string
- name: method_dependencies
sequence: string
- name: class_name
dtype: string
- name: test_classes
sequence: string
- name: class_constructor
dtype: string
- name: fields
sequence: string
splits:
- name: test
num_bytes: 2045749
num_examples: 100
download_size: 499568
dataset_size: 2045749
Dataset Card for FudanSELab ClassEval
Dataset Description
- Repository: GitHub Repository
- Paper: ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generation
Dataset Summary
We manually build ClassEval of 100 class-level Python coding tasks, consists of 100 classes and 412 methods, and average 33.1 test cases per class.
For 100 class-level tasks, diversity is maintained by encompassing these tasks over a wide spectrum of topics, including Management Systems, Data Formatting, Mathematical Operations, Game Development, File Handing, Database Operations and Natural Language Processing.
For 412 methods, they have been constructed with diverse dependencies, including (i) Library Dependency, where the methods rely on specific external libraries; (ii) Field Dependency, in which the methods are contingent on class instance variables, or fields; (iii) Method Dependency, where the methods are dependent on other methods within the same class; and (iv) Standalone, wherein the methods operate independently without reliance on fields, other methods, or external libraries.
Languages
The programming language is Python. The natural language used in the comments and docstrings is English.
Dataset Structure
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("FudanSELab/ClassEval")
DatasetDict({
test: Dataset({
features: ['task_id', 'skeleton', 'test', 'solution_code', 'import_statement', 'class_description', 'methods_info',
'class_name', 'test_classes', 'class_constructor', 'fields'],
num_rows: 100
})
})
Data Fields
The specific data fields for each task are delineated as follows:
task_id: the unique identifier for each task.
skeleton: the class skeleton, including all input descriptions in our class-level coding tasks.
test: all test cases for the whole class.
solution_code: the ground-truth class-level code for each task.
More fine-grained class-level information from the class skeleton, including:
import_statement: the import statements for each task.
class_name: the name of the class.
class_description: a concise description of the purpose and functionality of the class.
class_constructor: the whole constructor of the class.
fields: the fields defined in the class_constructor.
Detailed information for each method in the "methods_info" field, including:
method_name: the method signature.
method_input: the method contract design, including all input descriptions in the method.
test_code: the test cases for the method.
solution_code: the ground-truth method-level code.
dependencies: the dependency information of the method.
Data Splits
The dataset only consists of a test split with 100 samples.
Dataset Creation
Source Data
Manually-crafted
Additional Information
Licensing Information
This repository is under MIT license. But the data is distributes through CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Citation Information
@misc{du2023classeval,
title={ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generation},
author={Xueying Du and Mingwei Liu and Kaixin Wang and Hanlin Wang and Junwei Liu and Yixuan Chen and Jiayi Feng and Chaofeng Sha and Xin Peng and Yiling Lou},
year={2023},
eprint={2308.01861},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}
Contributions
Xueying Du [email protected]
Mingwei Liu [email protected]
Kaixin Wang [email protected]
Hanlin Wang [email protected]
Junwei Liu [email protected]
Yixuan Chen [email protected]
Jiayi Feng [email protected]
Chaofeng Sha [email protected]
Xin Peng [email protected]
Yiling Lou [email protected]