grammarly fix
#5
by
rohitdavas
- opened
ran a grammarly fix over the spelling, indentations, punctutations etc. nothing major.
Thanks for your PR!
At line 81, the bibtex needs to be left as is. It's a keyword for the citation not something that is displayed.
corrected it back.
sgugger
changed pull request status to
merged
line 84 shouldn't have been updated either
the change is comma before and. isn't that a good practise ?
no, it's generated / formatted code, we shouldn't touch it
reverted back in another pull request as this one is already merged.
Noted my mistake. Will focus on reading community guidelines first, to avoid future confusions.
no problem!