On Leakage of Code Generation Evaluation Datasets
Abstract
In this paper we consider contamination by code generation test sets, in particular in their use in modern large language models. We discuss three possible sources of such contamination and show findings supporting each of them: (i) direct data leakage, (ii) indirect data leakage through the use of synthetic data and (iii) overfitting to evaluation sets during model selection. Key to our findings is a new dataset of 161 prompts with their associated python solutions, dataset which is released at https://huggingface.co/datasets/CohereForAI/lbpp .
Community
Providing a supporting evidence: https://github.com/ise-uiuc/magicoder/issues/40
I believe that due to the weak decontamination of the training set, any publicly available test set is likely to be memorized by the models. Therefore, we should abandon benchmarks like HumanEval and MBPP, and instead move towards newer test sets like LiveCodeBench.
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper