---
license: apache-2.0
library_name: transformers
---
# Laser-Dolphin-Mixtral-2x7b-dpo

![laser_dolphin_image](./dolphin_moe.png)

**New Version will be uploaded soon**

Credit to Fernando Fernandes and Eric Hartford for their project [laserRMT](https://github.com/cognitivecomputations/laserRMT)

This model is a medium-sized MoE implementation based on [cognitivecomputations/dolphin-2.6-mistral-7b-dpo-laser](https://huggingface.co/cognitivecomputations/dolphin-2.6-mistral-7b-dpo-laser)

A 2x7b configuration offers better performance than a standard 7b model even if loaded in 4 bit. (9G VRAM)

If this 2x7b model is loaded in 4 bit the hellaswag score is .8270 which is higher than the base model achieves on its own in full precision.

The process is outlined in this [notebook](https://github.com/cognitivecomputations/laserRMT/blob/main/examples/laser-dolphin-mixtral-2x7b.ipynb)

**These Quants will result in unpredicted behavior and I am working on new Quants as I have updated the model**

Quatizations provided by [TheBloke](https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/laser-dolphin-mixtral-2x7b-dpo-GGUF)


  
## Code Example
Switch the commented model definition to use in 4-bit. Should work with 9GB and still exceed the single 7B model by 5-6 points roughly

```python
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

def generate_response(prompt):
    """
    Generate a response from the model based on the input prompt.

    Args:
    prompt (str): Prompt for the model.

    Returns:
    str: The generated response from the model.
    """
    # Tokenize the input prompt
    inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt")

    # Generate output tokens
    outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=256, eos_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id, pad_token_id=tokenizer.pad_token_id)

    # Decode the generated tokens to a string
    response = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)

    return response

# Load the model and tokenizer
model_id = "macadeliccc/laser-dolphin-mixtral-2x7b-dpo"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, load_in_4bit=True)

prompt = "Write a quicksort algorithm in python"

# Generate and print responses for each language
print("Response:")
print(generate_response(prompt), "\n")
```

[colab](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1cmRhAkDWItV7utHNqNANVZnqDqQNsTUr?usp=sharing) with usage example

## Eval

evaluation [colab](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1FpwgsGzCR4tORTxAwUxpN3PcP22En2xk?usp=sharing)

|                                               Model                                               |AGIEval|GPT4All|TruthfulQA|Bigbench|Average|
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------:|------:|---------:|-------:|------:|
|[laser-dolphin-mixtral-2x7b-dpo](https://huggingface.co/macadeliccc/laser-dolphin-mixtral-2x7b-dpo)|  41.31|  73.67|     61.69|   42.79|  54.87|

### AGIEval
|             Task             |Version| Metric |Value|   |Stderr|
|------------------------------|------:|--------|----:|---|-----:|
|agieval_aqua_rat              |      0|acc     |22.44|±  |  2.62|
|                              |       |acc_norm|21.26|±  |  2.57|
|agieval_logiqa_en             |      0|acc     |34.87|±  |  1.87|
|                              |       |acc_norm|35.79|±  |  1.88|
|agieval_lsat_ar               |      0|acc     |22.17|±  |  2.75|
|                              |       |acc_norm|23.04|±  |  2.78|
|agieval_lsat_lr               |      0|acc     |43.14|±  |  2.20|
|                              |       |acc_norm|45.10|±  |  2.21|
|agieval_lsat_rc               |      0|acc     |57.25|±  |  3.02|
|                              |       |acc_norm|55.76|±  |  3.03|
|agieval_sat_en                |      0|acc     |71.84|±  |  3.14|
|                              |       |acc_norm|71.84|±  |  3.14|
|agieval_sat_en_without_passage|      0|acc     |44.17|±  |  3.47|
|                              |       |acc_norm|41.75|±  |  3.44|
|agieval_sat_math              |      0|acc     |40.91|±  |  3.32|
|                              |       |acc_norm|35.91|±  |  3.24|

Average: 41.31%

### GPT4All
|    Task     |Version| Metric |Value|   |Stderr|
|-------------|------:|--------|----:|---|-----:|
|arc_challenge|      0|acc     |58.02|±  |  1.44|
|             |       |acc_norm|60.58|±  |  1.43|
|arc_easy     |      0|acc     |85.48|±  |  0.72|
|             |       |acc_norm|82.62|±  |  0.78|
|boolq        |      1|acc     |87.16|±  |  0.59|
|hellaswag    |      0|acc     |65.04|±  |  0.48|
|             |       |acc_norm|83.63|±  |  0.37|
|openbookqa   |      0|acc     |35.60|±  |  2.14|
|             |       |acc_norm|45.00|±  |  2.23|
|piqa         |      0|acc     |81.99|±  |  0.90|
|             |       |acc_norm|83.51|±  |  0.87|
|winogrande   |      0|acc     |73.16|±  |  1.25|

Average: 73.67%

### TruthfulQA
|    Task     |Version|Metric|Value|   |Stderr|
|-------------|------:|------|----:|---|-----:|
|truthfulqa_mc|      1|mc1   |44.31|±  |  1.74|
|             |       |mc2   |61.69|±  |  1.50|

Average: 61.69%

### Bigbench
|                      Task                      |Version|       Metric        |Value|   |Stderr|
|------------------------------------------------|------:|---------------------|----:|---|-----:|
|bigbench_causal_judgement                       |      0|multiple_choice_grade|59.47|±  |  3.57|
|bigbench_date_understanding                     |      0|multiple_choice_grade|66.67|±  |  2.46|
|bigbench_disambiguation_qa                      |      0|multiple_choice_grade|36.05|±  |  3.00|
|bigbench_geometric_shapes                       |      0|multiple_choice_grade|20.33|±  |  2.13|
|                                                |       |exact_str_match      | 7.52|±  |  1.39|
|bigbench_logical_deduction_five_objects         |      0|multiple_choice_grade|27.80|±  |  2.01|
|bigbench_logical_deduction_seven_objects        |      0|multiple_choice_grade|19.86|±  |  1.51|
|bigbench_logical_deduction_three_objects        |      0|multiple_choice_grade|48.67|±  |  2.89|
|bigbench_movie_recommendation                   |      0|multiple_choice_grade|49.60|±  |  2.24|
|bigbench_navigate                               |      0|multiple_choice_grade|53.20|±  |  1.58|
|bigbench_reasoning_about_colored_objects        |      0|multiple_choice_grade|68.50|±  |  1.04|
|bigbench_ruin_names                             |      0|multiple_choice_grade|41.74|±  |  2.33|
|bigbench_salient_translation_error_detection    |      0|multiple_choice_grade|16.23|±  |  1.17|
|bigbench_snarks                                 |      0|multiple_choice_grade|64.09|±  |  3.58|
|bigbench_sports_understanding                   |      0|multiple_choice_grade|70.69|±  |  1.45|
|bigbench_temporal_sequences                     |      0|multiple_choice_grade|37.70|±  |  1.53|
|bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects |      0|multiple_choice_grade|23.44|±  |  1.20|
|bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_seven_objects|      0|multiple_choice_grade|17.60|±  |  0.91|
|bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_three_objects|      0|multiple_choice_grade|48.67|±  |  2.89|

Average: 42.79%

Average score: 54.87%

Elapsed time: 02:53:28

## Citations

Fernando Fernandes Neto and Eric Hartford. "Optimizing Large Language Models Using Layer-Selective Rank Reduction and Random Matrix Theory." 2024.

```bibtex
@article{sharma2023truth,
title={The Truth is in There: Improving Reasoning in Language Models with Layer-Selective Rank Reduction},
author={Sharma, Pratyusha and Ash, Jordan T and Misra, Dipendra},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13558},
year={2023} }
```

```bibtex
@article{gao2021framework,
  title={A framework for few-shot language model evaluation},
  author={Gao, Leo and Tow, Jonathan and Biderman, Stella and Black, Sid and DiPofi, Anthony and Foster, Charles and Golding, Laurence and Hsu, Jeffrey and McDonell, Kyle and Muennighoff, Niklas and others},
  journal={Version v0. 0.1. Sept},
  year={2021}
}
```