File size: 12,731 Bytes
e62657d
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
---
license: apache-2.0
thumbnail: images/alfred-40b-1023.png
datasets:
- OpenAssistant/oasst1
- ehartford/dolphin
- tau/sled
- tiiuae/falcon-refinedweb
language:
- en
- fr
- de
- es
- it
tags:
- falcon-40b
- long-context
- falcon
- NTK-YaRN
---
# Model Card for Alfred-40B-1023

![a witty and elegant butler with a falcon on his shoulder, smile, flat illustration, simple shapes, colorful, lo-fi aesthetics](images/alfred-40b-1023.png)

`Alfred-40B-1023` is a finetuned version of [Falcon-40B](https://huggingface.co/tiiuae/falcon-40b), with an **extended context length of 8192 tokens**.
Finetuning was performed in October 2023. `Alfred-40B-1023` is made available under the Apache 2.0 License.

## Model Details

### Model Description

- **Developed by:** [LightOn](https://www.lighton.ai/) 
    * [Oskar Hallström](https://huggingface.co/ohallstrom) (project lead, training & modeling, internal long context data, evaluation)
    * [Amélie Chatelain](https://huggingface.co/ameliechatelain) (internal data & long context data, data generation)
    * [Clément Thiriet](https://huggingface.co/cthiriet) (data infrastructure, data generation, evaluation)
    * [Julien Séailles](https://huggingface.co/Jseailleslighton) (data generation)
    * [Adrien Cavaillès](https://huggingface.co/adcavail) (data generation)
    * [Axel Marmet](https://huggingface.co/WeightsnWizardry)* (training 2K baseline)

`*` work done while at LightOn
- **Model type:** Causal decoder-only;
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English, German, Spanish, French (and limited capabilities in Italian, Portuguese, Polish, Dutch, Romanian, Czech, Swedish);
- **License:** Apache 2.0 license.
- **Finetuned from model:** [Falcon-40B](https://huggingface.co/tiiuae/falcon-40b)
- **Training date:** October 2023 (`1023`).

## Uses

### Direct Use

`Alfred-40B-1023` can be used as a chat model or as an instruct model. 

For both instruct and chat mode, the model has been trained with chat tokens `<start_system>`, `<start_user>`, `<start_assistant>`, and `<end_message>`. These can be integrated into the prompt in the follwoing way:
```
<start_system>You are Alfred, a helpful assistant trained by LightOn. Knowledge cutoff: November 2022. Current date: 16 November, 2023<end_message><start_user>{user query}<end_message><start_assistant>
```

The stop word `<end_message>` should be used.

### Out-of-Scope Use

Production use without adequate assessment of risks and mitigation; any use cases which may be considered irresponsible or harmful. 

## Bias, Risks, and Limitations

`Alfred-40B-1023` is a finetune of Falcon-40B. As such, it is trained mostly on English, German, Spanish, French, with limited capabilities also in Italian, Portuguese, Polish, Dutch, Romanian, Czech, Swedish. It will not generalize appropriately to other languages. Furthermore, as it is trained on a large-scale corpora representative of the web, it will carry the stereotypes and biases commonly encountered online.

### Recommendations

We recommend users of `Alfred-40B-1023` to implement appropriate guardrails and precautions in any production use.

## How to Get Started with the Model

Use the code below to get started with the model.

```
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
import transformers
import torch

model = "lightonai/alfred-40b-1023"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("lightonai/alfred-0923-tokenizer")

pipeline = transformers.pipeline(
    "text-generation",
    model=model,
    tokenizer=tokenizer,
    torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
    trust_remote_code=True,
    device_map="auto",
)

sequences = pipeline(
   "<start_system>You are Alfred, a helpful assistant trained by LightOn. Knowledge cutoff: November 2022. Current date: 16 November, 2023<end_message><start_user>Write me an email to my boss, explaining how the company could benefit by using LightOns platform for Large Language Models, Paradigm.<end_message><start_assistant>",
    max_length=1000,
    do_sample=True,
    top_k=3,
    num_return_sequences=1,
    eos_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id,
)
for seq in sequences:
    print(f"Result: {seq['generated_text']}")
```

## Training Details

### Training Data

Alfred-40B-1023 was trained on a mixture of publicly available and in-house curated datasets. The training data is composed of 50 % short context tasks, 45 % long context tasks and 5 % RefinedWeb.

| **Short context sources** |
|--------------------|
| [oasst1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/OpenAssistant/oasst1) | 
| [dolphin](https://huggingface.co/ehartford/dolphin) |
| [openai-critiques](https://openaipublic.blob.core.windows.net/critiques/README.md) | 
| internal |
`internal` is a collection of synthetic and human-generated datasets created by Ligthon, tailored towards the use cases of our clients.

| **Long context sources** |
|--------------------|
| [sled](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tau/sled) | 
| internal-long-context |

`internal-long-context` is a collection of synthetic datasets generated by LightOn, tailored towards the use cases of our clients.

During training, we apply regular language modeling loss for a partition of the prompts in the long context data.

| **Pretraining objective source** |
|--------------------|
| [RefinedWeb](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tiiuae/falcon-refinedweb) | 

### Training Procedure 

`Alfred-40B-1023` was trained on 128 A100 40GB GPUs, using a 3D parallelism strategy (TP=8, PP=2, DP=8) combined with ZeRO. Alfred has been trained through supervised finetuning on 100 megatokens, with a learning rate decayed with a cosine schedule. 

#### Preprocessing

All datasets have been filtered, up or downsampled, and adapted to our chat token format.

#### Context length extension

We extend the context length to 8K with a custom method that we name NTK-YaRN. As guessable from its name, our extension method draws inspiration from NTK-aware interpolation and YaRN.

During our context length extension efforts, we experimented with various methods suitable for RoPE embeddings. These include vanilla [positional interpolation](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15595), [NTK-aware interpolation](https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/14lz7j5/ntkaware_scaled_rope_allows_llama_models_to_have/), [NTK-by-parts](https://github.com/jquesnelle/scaled-rope/pull/1), and lastly [YaRN](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00071).

YaRN looked very promising when applied at test-time, however finetuning with YaRN was not successful in our experiments. When extending the context length at training-time, NTK-aware interpolation was the most successful out of the already existing methods. Some of our results from trying different long context extension methods are shared in the Evaluation section below. We acknowledge that the same parameter values as proposed in the YaRN-paper have been used in our YaRN experiments, and that these potentially could have other optimal values for our particular setup.

##### NTK-YaRN

Similarly to NTK-aware interpolation (`NTK`), NTK-YaRN involves increasing the base of the RoPE embeddings. In the original implementation of NTK-aware interpolation the new base `b'` is adapted according to the following formula:

$$ b' = b \times s^{\frac{|D|}{|D|-2}} $$

where `b` is the original base, `s` the scaling factor of the context length, and `|D|` the model's head dimension.

However, we find (similar to other actors) that increasing the base slightly more is even better. The value of `b'` could probably be optimized even further, but for these experiments we have settled with the following value: 

$$ b' = b \times (s+1)^{\frac{|D|}{|D|-2}} $$

In the following parts of this model card, context length extension with this extended scaling of the base is referred to as `NTK-Margin`. For `NTK-YaRN`, the extended scaling of the base is combined with the modification of the computation of the attention weights made in YaRN, where the query and key matrices are scaled by the factor `m`. 

$$ m = 1 + 0.1 \times \log(s) $$

Scaling the query and key matrices this way substantially reduces the initial grad norm when applying a context length extension method in our training runs.

To cite NTK-YaRN, please refer to the model bibtex in the bottom of this model card.

## Evaluation

### Context length extension strategies
#### Training losses

After experimenting on a 7B scale, we finally run a selected partition of the extension methods on a 40B scale. In the figure below, we display the resulting training losses when training a 40B model with the different extension methods, ceteris paribus.

![Training loss curves for extension methods](images/training-loss-curves.png "Training loss curves for extension methods")

Initially, YaRN has the lowest training loss, which can be seen as a reflection of the fact that YaRN was the most successful extension method at test time. However all the other methods surpasse YaRN in terms of training loss already after a handful of megatokens. Comparing NTK-Margin vs NTK-YaRN, we can note that the scaling of Q and K matrices makes the training loss lower in the beginning, however NTK-YaRN's advantage over NTK-Margin decreases as the training goes on. Comparing NTK-Margin with NTK in turn, it seems like the larger value of the base in NTK-Margin gives an initial boost in training loss, however this advantage decreases as training goes on.

#### Performance on Long Context Benchmarks
We evaluate the context length extension methods on an own benchmark, consisting of four tasks.

* [Key-value retrieval UUID](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.03172.pdf)
* [Coarse-grained Topic Retrieval](https://lmsys.org/blog/2023-06-29-longchat/)
* [Fine-grained Line Retrieval](https://lmsys.org/blog/2023-06-29-longchat/)
* [Multi document retrieval data](https://nlp.stanford.edu/data/nfliu/lost-in-the-middle/nq-open-contriever-msmarco-retrieved-documents.jsonl.gz)

For each task, we have created 3 subtasks - one for each of the three context lengths 2K, 4K and 8K. In total, we thus have 12 subtasks. 

In order to get an aggregated score that values each subtask equally, we normalize the scores for each subtask and then calculate the mean of the normalized scores for each extension method.

![Aggregated scores on long context benchmarks](images/lc_benchmarks.png "Aggregated scores on long context benchmarks")

On these benchmarks, YaRN clearly lags behind. NTK-YaRN is the winning method, however NTK-Margin is so close that more extensive research is needed to verify that NTK-YaRN really is superior to NTK-Margin, especially when trained for longer.

### Comparison to 2K baseline

In order to track any potential degradation on 2K context tasks due to the context length extension, we compare our 8K model against a 2K model trained in a similar setup for 100 megatokens. When training the 2K baseline, we don't include any long context data.

We conduct the comparison by evaluating the models on a selection of tasks from EleutherAI harness, as well as ranking model outputs internally.

![Evaluation of 2K vs 8K version of alfred-40b-2023](images/2k_vs_8k.png "Evaluation of 2K vs 8K version of alfred-40b-2023")

Notably, our 8K model not only performs on par with our 2K model on most of our EleutherAI harness tasks, in fact it outperforms the 2K model on a majority of the tasks. Reading comprehension is the only subcategory for which our 8K model is outperformed by the 2K model.

We recognize that there is a discrepancy between performance on classical NLP benchmarks and how humans perceive the model quality. When model outputs (limited to 2K context lengths) are ranked by LightOn employees internally, the 2K and 8K have strikingly similar performance. However, a few rare failure modes have been noted for the 8K version, which are not seen when using the 2K model. These failure modes are likely to be fixable with better composition of the long context data.


## Compute Infrastructure

### Hardware

Alfred-40B-1023 was trained on AWS SageMaker, on 128 A100 40GB GPUs in P4d instances.

### Software

Alfred-40B-1023 was trained with a custom codebase. Training leverages a 3D parallelism approach combined with ZeRO, as well as high-performance kernels such as FlashAttention.

## Model Card Contact

Please open a Community Discussion for any support request related to using Alfred with HuggingFace transformers.

For any other inquiry: [email protected]

## Citation

If you find the model useful in your work, please use the following bibtex when citing.
```
@article{alfred-40b-1023,
  title={Alfred-40B-1023},
  author={Hallström, Oskar and Chatelain, Amélie and Thiriet, Clément and Séailles, Julien and Cavaillès, Adrien and Marmet, Axel},
  year={2023}
}
```