|
{"CAPTION FIG1.png": "'\\n\\n**Fig. 1.** The classic mutilated checkerboard (MC) problem.\\n\\n'", "CAPTION FIG2.png": "'\\n\\n**Fits 1.** **Experiment 3 at a time.**'", "CAPTION FIG3.png": "'\\n\\n**Fig. 1. The AHAI experience (three protocol excerpts).**'", "CAPTION FIG4.png": "'\\n\\n**Fig. 4. A sample production from switch.**'", "CAPTION FIG5.png": "'\\n\\n**Eto - A prototypical solution path.**'", "CAPTION FIG6.png": "'Figure 6: Frequencies of different types of invariants (first 10 min).\\n\\n'", "CAPTION FIG7.png": "'Figure 7: Number and type of invariants noticed in first and second halves of protocol.\\n\\n'", "CAPTION FIG8.png": "'\\n\\n**Fig. 8.** Categories covered (first \\\\(\\\\xi\\\\) min).\\n\\n'", "CAPTION TAB1.png": "'TABLE I\\n\\nSome Frablem Spaces Used by Subsets'", "CAPTION TAB10.png": "'\\n\\n\\\\begin{table}\\n\\\\begin{tabular}{l l'", "CAPTION TAB11.png": "'TABLE 11\\n\\nRank Orders of Times to First Mention Perceptual Invariant and to solution (\\\\(n=8\\\\) Salje\\\\(\\\\cdot\\\\)ts)'", "CAPTION TAB2.png": "'TABLE 2\\n\\nBreakdown of Time Spent after First Mention of Parity, before Rough Proof'", "CAPTION TAB3.png": "'TABLE 3\\n\\nMean Times to Points on Solution Path and Mean Number of Approaches Tried.\\n\\n'", "CAPTION TAB4.png": "'TABLE 4\\n\\nPairwise Co'", "CAPTION TAB5-1.png": "'TABLE 3\\n\\nMean Number of Relevant Parity Statements before/after Hints'", "CAPTION TAB5-2.png": "'\\n\\n## Chapter 4 Conclusion'", "CAPTION TAB5.png": "'\\n\\n\\\\begin{table}\\n\\\\begin{tabular}{l c c} & \\\\(\\\\pi=8\\\\) Subjects. \\\\\\\\ Mean Number of Relevant Parity Statements before/after Hints & Mean Number of Relevant Parity Statements before/after Hints \\\\\\\\ \\\\end{tabular}\\n\\\\end{table}\\nTable 5: Mean Number of Relevant Parity Statements before/after Hints'", "CAPTION TAB6-1.png": "'TABLE 6\\n\\nNumber of Subjects Solving after Various Hints (No. of Subjects in Each Group Who Re-ceived Each Hint; \\\\(n\\\\) = 23 Subjects)'", "CAPTION TAB6-2.png": "'* Other hints included the COUNT hint, and other very specific hints which were given only if the PARITY hint proved ineffective.\\n\\n'", "CAPTION TAB6.png": "'\\\\(\\\\bullet\\\\)\\n\\n\\\\(\\\\bullet\\\\)\\n'", "CAPTION TAB7-1.png": "'\\n\\n## Chapter 1 Introduction\\n\\nThe Standard Model (SM) is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics. The SM is a model of particle physics, which is a model of particle physics,'", "CAPTION TAB7-2.png": "'* \\\\(p\\\\leq 10\\\\), **\\\\(p\\\\leq .01\\\\) (one failed \\\\(r\\\\) test). Difference compared with BI_ANK group.\\n\\n'", "CAPTION TAB7.png": "'\\n\\n\\\\begin{table}\\n\\\\begin{tabular}{l c c c c} \\\\hline \\\\hline & & & & \\\\\\\\ \\\\hline \\\\hline \\\\end{tabular}\\n\\\\end{table}\\nTable 7: * \\\\(p<10\\\\), **\\\\(p<11\\\\)** (one failed \\\\(t\\\\) test). Differences compared with BLANK group.\\n\\n'", "CAPTION TAB8.png": "'TABLE 8\\n\\nOverall Frequency of Use (and Rate of Use) of Heuristics (\\\\(n=8\\\\) Subjects)'", "CAPTION TAB9-1.png": "'TABLE 9\\n\\nInvariant Properties Mentioned Repeatedly by Subjects (\\\\(\\\\alpha=8\\\\) Subjects)'", "CAPTION TAB9-2.png": "'_Note_. Listed first are all the invariants on the direct path to the insightful parity solution (i.e. the relevant invariants). Listed second are some common invariants that are not on the direct path to the insightful parity solution (i.e. the irrelevant invariants).\\n\\n'", "CAPTION TAB9.png": "'\\n\\n\\\\begin{table}\\n\\\\begin{tabular}{l c c} \\\\hline \\\\hline & & \\\\\\\\ \\\\hline \\\\hline \\\\end{tabular}\\n\\\\end{table}\\nTable 9: Isoperimetric Method Revisited by Subjects (\\\\(n=8\\\\) Subjects) Invariant Properties Mentioned Repeoriately by Subjects (\\\\(n=8\\\\) Subjects)'"} |
