Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ a folder of the scene images they had to draw (stimuli), and a excel file with t
|
|
119 |
score data.
|
120 |
The excel file had 117 rows and the 2 folders for aphantasia and control had 115 subject folders total.
|
121 |
Subject 168 did not fill out the demographic information or take the VVIQ and OSIQ test and
|
122 |
-
subjects 160, 161, and 162 did not have any drawings.
|
123 |
-
cleaning process and the final
|
124 |
|
125 |
#### Data Collection and Processing
|
126 |
|
@@ -137,12 +137,15 @@ and 1,2, or 3 depending on the order in which the participant did the drawings.
|
|
137 |
|
138 |
For perception: sub{subid}-pic{1,2,or 3}-{room}.png
|
139 |
These files were matched with the excel file rows by subject ID,
|
140 |
-
so each participant typically had 6 drawings total
|
141 |
-
|
142 |
-
format and therefore did not have all their drawings).
|
143 |
The actual image folder had 3 images (kitchen, living room, bedroom) that
|
144 |
-
were replicated to go with each of the
|
145 |
-
The final format of the data is
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
147 |
|
148 |
#### Example Analysis
|
@@ -159,11 +162,6 @@ The contributors of the original dataset and authors of the paper are:
|
|
159 |
- Alison Eardley (Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, London, UK)
|
160 |
- Chris Baker (Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA)
|
161 |
|
162 |
-
### Recommendations
|
163 |
-
|
164 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
165 |
-
|
166 |
-
Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
167 |
|
168 |
## Citation
|
169 |
|
|
|
119 |
score data.
|
120 |
The excel file had 117 rows and the 2 folders for aphantasia and control had 115 subject folders total.
|
121 |
Subject 168 did not fill out the demographic information or take the VVIQ and OSIQ test and
|
122 |
+
subjects 160, 161, and 162 did not have any drawings. 160, 161, and 162 were removed during the data
|
123 |
+
cleaning process and the final parquet file has 115 participants.
|
124 |
|
125 |
#### Data Collection and Processing
|
126 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
138 |
For perception: sub{subid}-pic{1,2,or 3}-{room}.png
|
139 |
These files were matched with the excel file rows by subject ID,
|
140 |
+
so each participant typically had 6 drawings total. Some of the drawings were blank white images or
|
141 |
+
had a question mark drawn indicating the participant could not recall the image.
|
|
|
142 |
The actual image folder had 3 images (kitchen, living room, bedroom) that
|
143 |
+
were replicated to go with each of the 115 participants.
|
144 |
+
The final format of the data is shown above.
|
145 |
+
|
146 |
+
For a look at the code used to process the data follow this google colab link:
|
147 |
+
|
148 |
+
https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1Oz1QL0mD9g3lVBgtmqHa-QiwwIJ2JaX5?usp=drive_link
|
149 |
|
150 |
|
151 |
#### Example Analysis
|
|
|
162 |
- Alison Eardley (Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, London, UK)
|
163 |
- Chris Baker (Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA)
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
166 |
## Citation
|
167 |
|