| [14:58] <schopin> o/ | |
| [14:58] <ginggs> o/ | |
| [14:59] <jawn-smith> o/ | |
| [14:59] <dbungert> o/ | |
| [14:59] <slyon> o/ | |
| [14:59] <jawn-smith> o===|==========> | |
| [14:59] <bdrung> \o | |
| [14:59] <jawn-smith> oops, didn't leave my sword by the door | |
| [15:00] <sil2100> o/ | |
| [15:00] <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team | |
| [15:00] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:00:41 UTC. The chair is jawn-smith. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | |
| [15:00] <ogayot> o/ | |
| [15:00] <juliank> o/ | |
| [15:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick | |
| [15:00] <jawn-smith> #topic Lightning Round | |
| [15:01] <jawn-smith> The status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundation-team-updates-thursday-30-june-2022/29123/10 | |
| [15:01] <jawn-smith> Let's all take a few minutes to read and ask questions | |
| [15:01] <jawn-smith> sil2100: It says you reviewed the --until/--thru PR | |
| [15:01] <jawn-smith> should I merge it? | |
| [15:02] <sil2100> Aaaah, didn't press the button | |
| [15:02] <ginggs> jawn-smith: i saw your libdigidoc fix, that package is orphaned in debian (QA maintained). if you're interested in getting an upload into debian, i'd be happy to sponsor | |
| [15:02] <sil2100> jawn-smith: done now o/ | |
| [15:03] <jawn-smith> ginggs, sil2100 thanks! I did submittodebian the patch I created | |
| [15:03] <schopin> libdigidoc? Isn't that obsoleted upstream too? | |
| [15:03] <jawn-smith> should it be removed from Debian/Ubuntu then? | |
| [15:04] <schopin> I'd be all for it, but that's mostly because I get spammed any time someone clicks the rebuild button on LP as I'm TIL | |
| [15:04] <jawn-smith> well, now I'm TIL :) | |
| [15:04] <schopin> \o/ | |
| [15:05] <jawn-smith> No reverse dependencies... | |
| [15:05] <mclemenceau> o/ | |
| [15:05] <jawn-smith> Okay I'll investigate filing a removal bug as part of my +1 shift this week | |
| [15:06] <schopin> Have a look at my initial RM bug, there should be some pointers there. | |
| [15:06] <ginggs> libdigidoc-tools might still be useful | |
| [15:07] <jawn-smith> I'll have a look this afternoon | |
| [15:07] <jawn-smith> and ping ginggs if we decide it should stay, then we can remove the diff from Debian | |
| [15:07] <jawn-smith> Any other questions? | |
| [15:08] <slyon> enr0n: I didn't receive this oomd email, is it stuck in moderation? | |
| [15:08] <enr0n> slyon: oof, possibly, let me check the list archive | |
| [15:09] <enr0n> This one I think: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2022-June/042159.html | |
| [15:10] <jawn-smith> The missing email has been found | |
| [15:10] <slyon> thx, it went through after all :) | |
| [15:10] <jawn-smith> Any other questions? | |
| [15:11] <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs | |
| [15:11] <jawn-smith> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs | |
| [15:11] <jawn-smith> bug 1980348 | |
| [15:11] <ubottu> Bug 1980348 in gcc-12 (Ubuntu) "gcc ftbfs in kinetic (crypt.h not found in 32bit libsanitizer build)" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980348 | |
| [15:12] <jawn-smith> gcc is kinda important | |
| [15:12] <doko> I figured that out an hour ago | |
| [15:12] <doko> just closing | |
| [15:12] <jawn-smith> oh excellent | |
| [15:12] <jawn-smith> Thanks! | |
| [15:12] <jawn-smith> Are you closing for both gcc-10 and gcc-12? | |
| [15:14] <jawn-smith> Sounds like it's still building for both, so we'll discuss it next week if it comes back | |
| [15:14] <jawn-smith> bug 1980195 | |
| [15:14] <ubottu> Bug 1980195 in apport (Ubuntu) "ubuntu desktop (canary) ISO & apport-collect, ubuntu-bug fail to run" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980195 | |
| [15:14] <jawn-smith> Looks like a potential dependency/import issue? | |
| [15:14] <jawn-smith> bdrung: Do you have an opinion? | |
| [15:15] <bdrung> jawn-smith, that was a regression in apport, but already fixed with the latest kinetic version | |
| [15:16] <jawn-smith> Excellent, thanks. Can you close the LP bug please? | |
| [15:16] <bdrung> i'll do the paperwork and close it | |
| [15:16] <jawn-smith> Thanks! | |
| [15:16] <ginggs> could we have a look at LP: #1979297 and see if it's something we want carded please? | |
| [15:16] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1979297 in pyopencl (Ubuntu) "pyopencl: please RM riscv64 binaries" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979297 | |
| [15:17] <jawn-smith> xypron: Thoughts on carding this? | |
| [15:21] <jawn-smith> We've agreed to let the removal go ahead, and therefore this does not need a card | |
| [15:21] <jawn-smith> That's it for kk | |
| [15:21] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs | |
| [15:21] <jawn-smith> bug 1979951 | |
| [15:21] <ubottu> Bug 1979951 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "127.0.0.1/::1 removed from loopback interface if you configure extra IPs on lo (r104 regression/behaviour change)" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979951 | |
| [15:21] <slyon> I tagged that one | |
| [15:21] <jawn-smith> Is filed against both netplan.io and systemd | |
| [15:22] <slyon> it's a regression, probably introduced by netplan switching to the "networkctl reload" command (instead of hard restart of sd-networkd) | |
| [15:22] <slyon> I think we should double check the situation on NetworkManager vs sd-networkd backends | |
| [15:22] <jawn-smith> Based on your last comment it seems this should be fixed in systemd, not netplan.io? Or do both need work? | |
| [15:22] <slyon> and then probably apply the upstream fix to systemd that's mentioned in the bug | |
| [15:22] <slyon> most probably systemd only | |
| [15:22] <slyon> so +1 for carding it | |
| [15:22] <jawn-smith> enr0n: Do you have the bandwidth to look into this? | |
| [15:23] <enr0n> jawn-smith: Yeah I should now | |
| [15:23] <jawn-smith> Okay so let's card it since someone has bandwidth to look into it. mclemenceau do you mind doing the carding? | |
| [15:24] <mclemenceau> Ok | |
| [15:24] <schopin> Do we want proper lo support in netplan, too? It does seem kinda hacky to use the ethernet type for it? | |
| [15:24] <slyon> schopin: we have a feature-request/bug report about "dummy" devices, which would be a better match for loopback | |
| [15:24] <slyon> we'll get to that eventually | |
| [15:25] <xnox> it would help with default resolved configs of dns too. | |
| [15:25] <schopin> nice, thanks :) | |
| [15:25] <xnox> (to set that on lo) | |
| [15:25] <jawn-smith> Okay excellent. It will be carded and the priority can be figured out in the future | |
| [15:25] <jawn-smith> bug 1978125 | |
| [15:25] <ubottu> Bug 1978125 in apt (Ubuntu Jammy) "apt ignoring pin/block/hold files in preferences.d for snapd" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978125 | |
| [15:25] <jawn-smith> we discussed this last week but I don't remember where we landed | |
| [15:25] * jawn-smith reads logs | |
| [15:25] <schopin> carded already | |
| [15:26] <jawn-smith> Okay so let's just remove the tag from the LP bug | |
| [15:26] <jawn-smith> I'll do that real quick | |
| [15:26] <ogayot> in iproute2, dummy and loopback type both exist | |
| [15:26] <jawn-smith> tag removed | |
| [15:27] <jawn-smith> rls-ii is empty | |
| [15:27] <jawn-smith> rls-ff only has the 127.0.0.1 bug | |
| [15:28] <jawn-smith> #topic Team proposed-migration report | |
| [15:28] <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs | |
| [15:28] <jawn-smith> no v_orlon today so I'll do this | |
| [15:28] <jawn-smith> ubuntu-meta is still with desktop | |
| [15:29] <slyon> we should probably ignore the systemd failures, as we've uploaded v251 today and all systemd related tests are currently re-run | |
| [15:29] <jawn-smith> python3-stdlib-extensions was with doko I believe | |
| [15:29] <jawn-smith> Any updates? | |
| [15:30] <jawn-smith> slyon: ack, thanks. Will ignore systemd | |
| [15:31] <jawn-smith> doko will look at python-bayespy and bdrung will look at apport. Thanks! | |
| [15:31] <jawn-smith> usb-creator is waiting on an MIR | |
| [15:31] <jawn-smith> mutt is also waiting on an MIR (which is waiting on security) | |
| [15:31] <jawn-smith> systemd, skip | |
| [15:31] <doko> is anybody working on these MIRs? | |
| [15:31] <ginggs> i think python-bayespy just needs a retry with the new version | |
| [15:32] <slyon> doko: yes, those are in progress | |
| [15:32] <doko> ta | |
| [15:32] <jawn-smith> doko: Yes, at least the two mutt related MIRs are waiting on security review | |
| [15:33] <schopin> alexghiti is the one driving them from our side | |
| [15:33] <jawn-smith> openssl | |
| [15:33] <schopin> on it | |
| [15:33] <jawn-smith> schopin: hooray, thanks | |
| [15:33] <jawn-smith> llvm-toolchain-14 | |
| [15:34] <schopin> missing builds are for the same reason as gcc, I believe. | |
| [15:34] <jawn-smith> Excellent. Does i386 need to be re-triggered? | |
| [15:35] <ginggs> jawn-smith: do it! | |
| [15:35] <jawn-smith> done! | |
| [15:35] <doko> and the autopkg test failure is a kill -9 | |
| [15:35] <jawn-smith> the autopkgtests for this fenics-dofinx package look flakey | |
| [15:36] <doko> so try on a machine with more memory? | |
| [15:36] <schopin> there was a sigkill in the test suite, oom? | |
| [15:36] <jawn-smith> Does it need to be added to big-packages? | |
| [15:36] <jawn-smith> Anyone want to volunteer to look into that? | |
| [15:36] <ginggs> i'll have a look at fenics-dofinx and add it to big_packages | |
| [15:37] <jawn-smith> thanks! | |
| [15:37] <ginggs> now, that I can :) | |
| [15:37] <jawn-smith> moving on | |
| [15:37] <jawn-smith> lintian appears to need MIR investigation | |
| [15:37] <slyon> yay! new lintian depends. they're being introduced faster than we can process them :) | |
| [15:37] <jawn-smith> or possibly just binary package demotion if we're lucky? | |
| [15:37] <slyon> I'll do the initial investigation for lintian | |
| [15:37] <jawn-smith> slyon: thanks! | |
| [15:38] <jawn-smith> apport is with bdrung | |
| [15:38] <jawn-smith> python-httplib2. One of those is apport and therefore already covered | |
| [15:38] <jawn-smith> then python-httplib2 itself has an armhf regression | |
| [15:38] <ogayot> I think the python-httplib2 vs apport needs a retry | |
| [15:38] <jawn-smith> anyone here an expert in both python and the armhf architecture....? | |
| [15:39] <waveform> erm... | |
| [15:39] <jawn-smith> waveform: do you have bandwidth to look at that test? | |
| [15:39] <waveform> yeah, I'll take that one | |
| [15:39] <ogayot> E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cryptography' | |
| [15:39] <jawn-smith> Thanks! | |
| [15:40] <jawn-smith> well that should be an easy fix | |
| [15:40] <jawn-smith> moving on, curl is missing builds on quite a few architectures | |
| [15:40] <jawn-smith> I'll take that one | |
| [15:40] <waveform> don't jinx it... | |
| [15:40] <jawn-smith> pygments | |
| [15:41] <jawn-smith> has an excuses bug already | |
| [15:41] <jawn-smith> waiting on a new version of pytest | |
| [15:42] <jawn-smith> so we can ignore that for now | |
| [15:42] <jawn-smith> everything else is 0 days old so that's it for proposed migration | |
| [15:42] <bdrung> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pytest shows a lot of regressions | |
| [15:42] <jawn-smith> #topic AOB | |
| [15:43] <jawn-smith> Monday is a US holiday | |
| [15:43] * xnox 0/ | |
| [15:44] <xnox> a few ubiquity uploads to jammy & kinetic are missing from lp:ubiquity. Does anybody want to push their git tags / uploads? or should i synthesize those? | |
| [15:44] <xnox> i.e. uploads from bdrung bdmurray and external person. | |
| [15:46] <bdrung> the commits are here: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+ref/master | |
| [15:49] <xnox> bdrung: and tags? git push --tags | |
| [15:49] <xnox> 22.10.3 | |
| [15:49] <xnox> 22.04.16 | |
| [15:49] <xnox> 22.04.15 | |
| [15:50] <xnox> https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity?h=master => tags and jammy branch are missing. | |
| [15:50] <xnox> i can tag 22.04.16 and push it to jammy branch, if that's what we are ok with. | |
| [15:51] <xnox> but want to check if something unexpected happened. | |
| [15:51] <xnox> also tsimonq2 upload is nowhere to be seen in git | |
| [15:51] <bdrung> it's probably fine to add the missing tags (after checking that this tag actually is identical to the uploaded dsc) | |
| [15:52] <xnox> also http://launchpadlibrarian.net/607553669/ubiquity_22.10.2_22.10.3.diff.gz chagnes the icon, which is not documented, and not expected? | |
| [15:53] <xnox> i'll query that separately. | |
| [15:57] <jawn-smith> This conversation seems to be resolved, so | |
| [15:57] <jawn-smith> #endmeeting | |
| [15:58] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 15:57:59 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-06-30-15.00.moin.txt | |
| [16:03] <bdrung> for the apport autopkgtest failure we have https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1980390 now | |
| [16:03] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1980390 in apport (Ubuntu) "test_core_dump_packaged test flaky on arm64 and ppc64el" [Undecided, New] | |