| [07:12] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers | |
| [07:14] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN | |
| [07:14] <oSoMoN> hi duflu | |
| [07:16] <jpnurmi> good morning oSoMoN and hi duflu | |
| [07:17] <oSoMoN> good morning jpnurmi | |
| [07:21] <duflu> Hi jpnurmi | |
| [08:23] <Nafallo> morning! | |
| [08:35] <duflu> Hi Nafallo | |
| [08:44] <KGB-0> gnome-shell-extension-harddisk-led tags 4c499b3 Jonathan Carter upstream/29 * https://deb.li/3jX3F | |
| [09:32] <Nafallo> got a bug about ubiquity crashing with an HDMI cabel attached? | |
| [09:36] <luna> Updated from Ubuntu MATE 20.04.2 to 20.04.4 yesterday, and it went fine, to remove 6 packages and add 256 other ones :) | |
| [09:36] <luna> also morning desktoppers | |
| [09:54] <KGB-2> gnome-shell Muqtadir 299358 * commented merge request !56 * https://deb.li/3Hcjx | |
| [10:17] <Nafallo> jpnurmi: do we have a testing area on iso.qa for the new installer? | |
| [10:21] <jpnurmi> Nafallo: i don't know what's the current status but afaik the qa team is setting it up | |
| [10:22] <luna> is the daily builds gonna be fixed, last build was 23th February afaik | |
| [10:22] <luna> for the new installer that is* | |
| [10:24] <jpnurmi> seb128: do you know what's going on with the daily canary builds? | |
| [10:30] <Nafallo> jpnurmi: does it make sense to test them for the testing week? :-) | |
| [10:32] <Nafallo> jpnurmi: https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/429/builds/244794/testcases found it! | |
| [10:34] <Nafallo> (testing) | |
| [10:55] <Nafallo> hmm. think we're moving on to non-canary :-) | |
| [10:57] <jpnurmi> ooh, nice! | |
| [10:57] <jpnurmi> well, currently, the latest available iso is one week old... :( | |
| [10:59] <Nafallo> yeah, that's the one that seems to be confused about how to install linux-generic :-) | |
| [11:01] <Nafallo> right. we're taking a lunch break | |
| [11:03] <slyon> hey Trevinho, seb128: the latest gjs bumped its mozjs dependency from mozjs78 to mozjs91, I couldn't find a prior MIR for mozjs78 so I guess we should do a proper/full MIR for mozjs91. May I ask you to have a look at that? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs91/+bug/1962591 | |
| [11:03] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1962591 in mozjs91 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] mozjs91" [Undecided, Incomplete] | |
| [11:04] <seb128> slyon, hey, it's the same source we roll on newer series | |
| [11:04] <Trevinho> slyon: I think didier will look into that, not sure it's a full MIR request though... being just an updated version of the same | |
| [11:04] <Trevinho> we may need one for adwaita though | |
| [11:04] <slyon> Trevinho: but has there been a prio MIR somewhere? I couldn't find any | |
| [11:05] <seb128> slyon, I'm trying to figure out when it was promoted, mozjs52 was already in main in bionic | |
| [11:06] <Trevinho> I can't either, I guess there was one in the past | |
| [11:06] <Trevinho> and we've this note (unrelated to MIR though, and not totally true anymore) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/FAQ#mozjs | |
| [11:06] <seb128> slyon, ah, found it, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs38/+bug/1683937 | |
| [11:06] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1683937 in mozjs38 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] mozjs38" [Undecided, Fix Released] | |
| [11:07] <slyon> seb128: thanks that'd be great. If we can find any documentation about it we should reference that to the MIR bug mentioned above, so we can consider it as "just a version bump" | |
| [11:07] <slyon> seb128: awesome. I'll put that into LP! | |
| [11:07] <seb128> slyon, thanks! | |
| [11:08] <seb128> slyon, which also points out the wiki section Trevinho mentioned | |
| [14:12] <Nafallo> welcome alocer[m], my collegue :-) | |
| [14:12] <alocer[m]> Hello everyone. :-) | |
| [14:17] <oSoMoN> welcome here alocer[m] | |
| [14:20] <seb128> hey alocer[m] | |